Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 28 - 28
1 Jun 2016
Gill S McLuckie S Reidy M Cochrane L Johnston L
Full Access

Functional scores are used to clinically assess total hip arthroplasty (THA) and for comparative purposes in orthopaedic literature. Previous pilot work has highlighted patient comorbidity as a potential source of bias in addition to the often-examined factors of age, gender and underlying diagnosis.

We analysed prospectively collected data relating to 217 primary THAs (Tayside Arthroplasty Audit Group database). Sample size was calculated from previous pilot data (significance level 5%, power 80%, effect size 0.25). Proportional stratified sampling was performed including all patient age groups (≤40, 41–55, 56–65, >65) and four fixation classes (cemented, hybrid, uncemented and Birmingham resurfacing). Five year Harris Hip Function Score (HHFS) was the dependent variable; age, sex, underlying diagnosis, BMI, pre-operative HHFS and comorbidity (Functional Comorbidity Index; range 0–8) were co-variates/co-factors.

In univariate analysis, FCI accounted for 11% of the variation in HHFS at 5 years. Regarding patients with FCI 0–1 as a reference group, patients with greater comorbidity had lower HHFS at 5 years (FCI 2–3: −3.95; FCI 4–5: −7.21, FCI ≥6: −6.92). In a multivariable model of HHFS at 5 years, FCI group, diagnosis, pre-operative HHFS, patient age and BMI were significant. HHFS at 5 years was significantly higher in FCI group 0–1 than any other category (2–3 P=0.006, 4–5 P<0.001, ≥6 P=0.002). In total, the model accounted for 29% of variability in HHFS at 5 years.

This is the first statistically robust study to examine the effect of comorbidity on THA function. These results strongly suggest that increasing patient comorbidity is associated with poorer THA function when measured using HHS.

Two significant conclusions can be drawn:

Patient comorbidity should be taken into account pre-operatively when considering potential future THA function.

When comparing across implants, failure to give specific consideration to comorbidity of patient groups will limit relevance and weight of findings.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_12 | Pages 36 - 36
1 Nov 2015
Reidy M Faulkner A Shitole B Clift B
Full Access

Introduction

There is a paucity of research investigating the effect of the experience of the operating surgeon on the long term function and survivorship of total hip replacements (THR). With the advent of individualised surgeon data being available to patients via the National Joint Registry, the desire to avoid complications and poor performance grows. This potentially reduces the availability of operative opportunities for trainees as consultants seek to ensure good results.

Method & Results

A multicentre retrospective study of 879 THR was undertaken to investigate any differences in outcome between trainee surgeons and consultants. The effect of trainee supervision on the surgical outcome was also assessed. The primary outcome measures were survivorship and the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Rates of deep infection and dislocation were also recorded. Patients were evaluated pre-operatively and at 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years post-operatively. Surgical outcome was compared between junior trainees, senior trainees and consultants. The effect of supervision on final outcome was determined by comparing supervised and unsupervised trainees.

66.4% of patients were operated by consultants, 15.7% by junior trainees (ST3–5 equivalent) and 16.8% by senior trainees (ST6–8 equivalent). 10 year implant survival rates were; consultants 96.4 %, senior trainees 98.0 % and junior trainees 97.1%. There was no significant difference in post-operative HHS among consultants, senior and junior trainees at 1 year (p=0.122), 3 year (p=0.282), 5 year (p=0.063), 7 year (p=0.875), or at 10 years (p=0.924). There was no significant difference in HHS between supervised and unsupervised trainees at 1 year (p=0.220), 3 year (p=0.0.542), 5 year (p=0.880), 7 year (p=0.953) and 10-years (p=0.787). Comparison of surgical outcome between the supervised and unsupervised trainees also shows no significant difference in implant survival years (p=0.257).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_12 | Pages 35 - 35
1 Nov 2015
Reidy M Gill S MacLeod J Finlayson D
Full Access

Introduction

Functional scores are used to clinically assess total hip arthroplasty (THA) and for comparative purposes in the orthopaedic literature. Previous research has highlighted patient age, gender and underlying diagnosis as potential sources of bias but comorbidity has not been considered. The Functional Comorbidity Index (FCI) is a published epidemiological tool which correlates disease with associated physical function deficit. It scores 18 conditions: one point for each, total score 0–18.

Method & Results

We analysed 41 fully cemented primary THAs in patients ≤55 years at time of surgery with a minimum 10 years follow up. Past medical history was collected via thorough case note review. Patients were assessed using the SF-12 questionnaire, Harris Hip and WOMAC indexes.

The study population consisted of 29 patients: 12 women, 17 men. Mean age: 45 years (range 22–53). All patients received cemented polished Corin TaperFit stem with polyethylene Ogee cup. Mean follow up 13.4 years (range 10.2–17.7).

FCI scores ranged 0–3 (12 hips=0; 19 hips=1, 5 hips=2, 5 hips=4). A Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the relationship between co-morbidity and hip function score using all three indexes.

SF-12 score: Mean (M) =88.7; Standard Deviation (SD) =19.3; Range 0–166.

Mean by FCI subgroup: 0=91, 1=96, 2=76.8, 3=68.6 (r=−0.407)

HHS: M=83.8; SD=17.0; Range 45–100.

Mean by FCI subgroup: 0=94.7; 1=88.2, 2=63.5, 3=54.6 (r= −0.813)

WOMAC: M=79.1; SD=20.7; Range 34–100.

Mean by FCI subgroup: 0=94.4, 1=91.72, 2=48.8, 3=37.4 (r=−0.812)