Circular frames in the lower limbs have been removed by Specialist nurses in our clinics for the past 20 years using Entonox. This standard of care has helped reduce the burden of health care cost by avoiding removal of frames in theatres. We have recently started using Penthrox and present our encouraging initial data suggestive of superior efficacy when compared to Entonox. We included in this study the last ten patients on whom Entonox was used during frame removal and the first ten patients on whom Penthrox was used. Visual analogue pain scale was used to quantify pain at the beginning, middle and at the end of frame removal in both groups. The data was found to be normally distributed and Unpaired T test was used to analyse it. Confidence interval of 95% and p-value 0.05 deemed significant.Introduction
Materials and Methods
Pedicle screw systems are now the commonest method of achieving posterior spinal fixation. Surgical planning in spinal surgery may include measuring pedicle size to guide screw size on WEBPACS. We performed a study to determine whether measuring pedicle size on CT is accurate and reproducible using the WEBPACS ruler tool. A human cadaveric spine along with 5 geometrical shapes were scanned using a multislice spiral CT scanner with 1mm cuts. The objects and the pedicle diameters for lumbar and thoracic vertebrae in the axial plane were measured independently using the WEBPACS ruler tool by 2 observers (to the nearest 0.1mm). The geometrical shapes and pedicle size on the skeleton were then measured using Vernier callipers by an independent third observer. All measurements were repeated a week later. The WEBPACS ruler on a CT scan is accurate to within 0.5-0.6mm of the true size of an object. The error for pedicle measurements is marginally higher (0.6-1.0mm) and this may reflect the fact that they are ill defined geometric shapes. Measuring pedicle size on CT for surgical planning may have implications for small pedicles when sizing them up for a good screw.
The aim of this prospective study was to determine the prevalence of bone marrow oedema (BME) in asymptomatic knees of athletes and to investigate the factors associated with appearance of BME in this group. A total of 25 asymptomatic athletes who competed at an international, national or county level during their most recent sport season were recruited in this study and had MRI scan of both knees (n=50). MRI scans were reported independently by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists. Statistical analysis included Cohen's kappa test to identify inter-observer agreement for MRI diagnosis of bone marrow oedema and multiple logistic regression model to identify the factors associated with BME on MRI scan. There was very good agreement between radiologists for diagnosis of BME (Kappa = 0.896). Seven participants (28%) were found to have BME. Six of the participants had BME in unilateral knees and one participant had BME in bilateral knees. The commonest location of BME was medial femoral condyle (62.5%) The amount of time spent in preseason training (34-38 weeks) was significantly associated with appearance of BME (P=0.048) BME seems to be common in asymptomatic athletes and one should realize that this finding might not be related to the clinical complaints of the patients. The results of the present study show that there is a training effect associated with BME. Knowing what is a ‘normal’ or ‘abnormal’ scan is important for a competitive athlete, as erroneously diagnosing BME as the underlying cause of athletes' symptoms could lead to decreased playing time or inappropriate therapy.
