Gait measurements can vary due to various intrinsic and extrinsic factors, and this variability becomes more pronounced using inertial sensors in a free-living environment. Therefore, identifying and quantifying the sources of variability is essential to ensure measurement reliability and maintain data quality. This study aimed to determine the variability of daily accelerations recorded by an inertial sensor in a group of healthy individuals. Ten participants, four males and six females, with a mean age of 50 years (range: 29–61) and BMI of 26.9 kg/m2 (range: 21.4–36.8), were included. A single accelerometer continuously recorded lower limb accelerations over two weeks. We extracted and analyzed the accelerations of three consecutive strides within walking bouts if the time difference between the bouts was more than two hours. Multivariate mixed-effects modeling was performed on both the discretized acceleration waveforms at 101 points (0–100) and the harmonics of the signals in the frequency domain to determine the variance components for different subjects, days, bouts, and steps as the random effect variables. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for between-day, between-bout, and between-step comparisons. The results showed that the ICCs for the between-day, between-bout, and between-step comparisons were 0.73, 0.82, 0.99 for the vertical axis; 0.64, 0.75, 0.99 for the anteroposterior axis; and 0.55, 0.96, 0.97 for the mediolateral axis. For the signal harmonics, the respective ICCs were 0.98, 0.98, 0.99 for the vertical axis; 0.54, 0.93, 0.98 for the anteroposterior axis; and 0.69, 0.78, 0.95 for the mediolateral axis. Overall, this study demonstrated that accelerations recorded continuously for multiple days in a free-living environment exhibit high variability, mainly between days, and some variability arising from differences between walking bouts during different times within days. However, reliable and repeatable gait measurements can be obtained by identifying and quantifying the sources of variability.
The tendency towards using inertial sensors for remote monitoring of the patients at home is increasing. One of the most important characteristics of the sensors is sampling rate. Higher sampling rate results in higher resolution of the sampled signal and lower amount of noise. However, higher sampling frequency comes with a cost. The main aim of our study was to determine the validity of measurements performed by low sampling frequency (12.5 Hz) accelerometers (SENS) in patients with knee osteoarthritis compared to standard sensor-based motion capture system (Xsens). We also determined the test-retest reliability of SENS accelerometers. Participants were patients with unilateral knee osteoarthritis. Gait analysis was performed simultaneously by using Xsens and SENS sensors during two repetitions of over-ground walking at a self-selected speed. Gait data from Xsens were used as an input for AnyBody musculoskeletal modeling software to measure the accelerations at the exact location of two defined virtual sensors in the model (VirtualSENS). After preprocessing, the signals from SENS and VirtualSENS were compared in different coordinate axes in time and frequency domains. ICC for SENS data from first and second trials were calculated to assess the repeatability of the measurements. We included 32 patients (18 females) with median age 70.1[48.1 – 85.4]. Mean height and weight of the patients were 173.2 ± 9.6 cm and 84.2 ± 14.7 kg respectively. The correlation between accelerations in time domain measured by SENS and VirtualSENS in different axes was r = 0.94 in y-axis (anteroposterior), r = 0.91 in x-axis (vertical), r = 0.83 in z-axis (mediolateral), and r = 0.89 for the magnitude vector. In frequency domain, the value and the power of fundamental frequencies (F0) of SENS and VirtualSENS signals demonstrated strong correlation (r = 0.98 and r = 0.99 respectively). The result of test-retest evaluation showed excellent repeatability for acceleration measurement by SENS sensors. ICC was between 0.89 to 0.94 for different coordinate axes. Low sampling frequency accelerometers can provide valid and reliable measurements especially for home monitoring of the patients, in which handling big data and sensors cost and battery lifetime are among important issues.
To describe demographic data, clinical outcome and short-term survival after shoulder arthroplasty. The Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Register was established in 2004. All 40 Danish hospitals and private clinics where shoulder arthroplasty are performed are participating. Since 2006 where the reporting to the register became mandatory the compliance of reporting has been 88.9%. Data are collected by an internet based clinical measuring system where the orthopaedic surgeon report data such as diagnosis, type of arthroplasty, and demographic data. The follow-up results are collected by sending a questionnaire to the patient 10–14 month after the operation. The questionnaire contains a Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index (WOOS). Each question is answered on a visual analogue scale with a possible score ranging from 0–100. There are 19 questions and the total score is ranging from 0–1900. For simplicity of presentation the raw scores is converted to a percentage of a normal shoulder.Objective
Materials and Methods
Several clinical studies demonstrated long-term adjacent-level effects after implantation of spinal fusion devices[1]. These effects have been reported as adjacent joint degeneration and the development of new symptoms correlating with adjacent segment degeneration[2] and the trend has therefore gone to motion preservation devices; however, these effects have not been understood very well and have not been investigated thoroughly[3]. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of varying the stiffness of spinal fusion devices on the adjacent vertebral levels. Disc forces, moments and facet joint forces were analyzed. The AnyBody Modeling System was used to compute the in-vivo muscle and joint reaction forces of a musculoskeletal model. The full body model used in this study consists of 188 muscle fascicles in the lumbar spine and more than 1000 individual muscle branches in total. The model has been proposed by de Zee et al.[3], validated by Rasmussen et al.[4] and by Galibarov et al.[5]. The new model[5] determines the individual motions between vertebrae based on the equilibrium between forces acting on the vertebrae from muscles and joints and the passive stiffness in disks and ligaments, figure 1a. An adult of 1.75 m and 75 kg with a spinal implant in L4L5 was modeled. This model was subjected to a flexion-extension motion using different elastic moduli to analyze and compare to a non-implanted scenario. The analyzed variables were vertebral motion, the disc reaction forces and moments, as well as facet joint forces in the treated and the adjacent levels: L2L3, L3L4, L4L5 and L5-Sacrum.INTRODUCTION
METHODS
To compare regional body composition, bone mineral density (BMD), and clinical outcome in patients with two different shoulder arthroplasty designs. This cross-sectional study included 54 patients with a total of 63 shoulder arthroplasties. There were 18 men and 45 women with a mean age of 68.9 years SD ± 10.5. Mean follow-up time was 39.2 months SD ± 14.4. The patients were divided into three groups according to their history: 22 patients were diagnosed with a proximal humeral fracture and treated with a stemmed hemi arthroplasty, 11 patients were diagnosed with osteoarthritis and treated with a stemmed hemi arthroplasty, and 30 patients were diagnosed with osteoarthritis and treated with a resurfacing arthroplasty. All patients underwent a one-day protocol: Regional Dual X-ray Absorptiometri (DXA) was used to measure BMD of the distal third of humerus and regional body composition of the upper arm. The clinical outcome was measured using Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index (WOOS) and Constant-Murley score.Objective
Materials and Methods
