Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS: INVESTIGATING MUSCLE ACTIVATION ASYMMETRY DURING GAIT USING A COMPREHENSIVE THORACIC MUSCULOSKELETAL MODEL

The European Orthopaedic Research Society (EORS) 32nd Annual Meeting, Aalborg, Denmark, 18–20 September 2024.



Abstract

Introduction

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional deformity of the spine with unclear etiology. Due to the asymmetry of lateral curves, there are differences in the muscle activation between the convex and concave sides. This study utilized a comprehensive thoracic spine and ribcage musculoskeletal model to improve the biomechanical understanding of the development of AIS deformity and approach an explanation of the condition.

Methods

In this study, we implemented a motion capture model using a generic rigid-body thoracic spine and ribcage model, which is kinematically determinate and controlled by spine posture obtained, for instance, from radiographs. This model is publicly accessible via a GitHub repository. We simulated gait and standing models of two AIS (averaging 15 years old, both with left lumbar curve and right thoracic curve averaging 25 degrees) and one control subject. The marker set included extra markers on the sternum and the thoracic and lumbar spine. The study was approved by the regional Research Ethics Committee (Journal number: H17034237).

Results

We investigated the difference between the muscle activation on the right and left sides including erector spinae (ES), psoas major (PS), and multifidus (MF). Results of the AIS simulations indicated that, on average throughout the gait cycle, the right ES, left PS and left MF had 46%, 44%, and 23% higher activities compared to the other side, respectively. In standing, the ratios were 28%, 40%, and 19%, respectively. However, for the control subject, the differences were under 7%, except ES throughout the gait, which was 17%.

Conclusion

The musculoskeletal model revealed distinct differences in force patterns of the right and left sides of the spine, indicating an instability phenomenon, where larger curves lead to higher muscle activations for stabilization.

Acknowledgement

The project is funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 program through Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant No. [764644].


Corresponding author: Hamed Shayestehpour