It has been reported that 60-85% of patients who undergo PAO have concomitant intraarticular pathology that cannot be addressed with PAO alone. Currently, there are limited diagnostic tools to determine which patients would benefit from hip arthroscopy at the time of PAO to address intra-articular pathology. This study aims to see if preoperative PROMs scores measured by IHOT-33 scores have predictive value in whether intra-articular pathology is addressed during PAO + scope. The secondary aim is to see how often surgeons at high-volume hip preservation centers address intra-articular pathology if a scope is performed during the same anesthesia event. A randomized, prospective Multicenter trial was performed on patients who underwent PAO and hip arthroscopy to treat hip dysplasia from 2019 to 2020. Preoperative PROMs and intraoperative findings and procedures were recorded and analyzed. A total of 75 patients, 84% Female, and 16% male, with an average age of 27 years old, were included in the study. Patients were randomized to have PAO alone 34 patients vs. PAO + arthroscopy 41 patients during the same anesthesia event. The procedures performed, including types of labral procedures and chondroplasty procedures, were recorded. Additionally, a two-sided student T-test was used to evaluate the difference in means of preoperative IHOT score among patients for whom a labral procedure was performed versus no labral procedure. A total of 82% of patients had an intra-articular procedure performed at the time of hip arthroscopy. 68% of patients who had PAO + arthroscopy had a labral procedure performed. The most common labral procedure was a labral refixation which was performed in 78% of patients who had a labral procedure performed. Femoral head-neck junction chondroplasty was performed in 51% of patients who had an intra-articular procedure performed. The mean IHOT score was 29.3 in patients who had a labral procedure performed and 33.63 in those who did not have a labral procedure performed P- value=0.24. Our findings demonstrate preoperative IHOT-33 scores were not predictive in determining whether intra-articular labral pathology was addressed at the time of surgery. Additionally, we found that if labral pathology was addressed, labral refixation was the most common repair performed. This study also provides valuable information on what procedures high-volume hip preservation centers are performing when performing PAO + arthroscopy.
Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a common risk factor of early osteoarthritis (OA), with insufficient coverage of the femoral head by the acetabulum which leads to excessive cartilage stresses in the hip joint. Knowledge of the molecular health of cartilage using MRI may diagnose and stage chondral disease, but more importantly allows for treatment stratification and prognostication. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) is a validated MRI technique for detecting early loss of proteoglycan (PG). However, it requires an injection of contrast agent and exercise prior to the scan. MRI techniques such as T1ρ and T2 mapping have also been shown to be sensitive to early biochemical changes in cartilage but can be performed without any contrast injection. In this study we evaluate three quantitative MR techniques (dGEMRIC, T1ρ and T2 mapping) in patients with DDH. Our hypothesis is that both T1ρ and T2 correlate with dGEMRIC, and thus may be effective non-contrast based techniques for biochemical cartilage mapping in DDH hips. Seven informed and consented patients (mean age: 31.1 years) with DDH were enrolled in this IRB approved MRI study before surgery. DDH was defined as a lateral center-edge angle under 25º and acetabular index >13º on the plain x-ray. All subjects underwent two successive MRI sessions at 3T: In the first cartilage T1ρ and T2 mapping were performed. After leaving the scanner the subjects were injected with 0.4ml/kg Dotarem (i.v.), walked for 15min and rested for 25min before returning into the MRI. dGEMRIC (T1post) mapping was initiated approximately 45min after the injection. Image post-processing, registration and cartilage segmentation was performed with Matlab. The joint was subdivided into anterior and posterior regions in the sagittal plane and into lateral, intermediate and medial zones in the transverse plane, resulting in six region of interest (ROIs): antero-lateral, antero-intermediate, antero-medial, postero-lateral, postero-intermediate and postero-medial. The correlation between the dGEMRIC and T1ρ and dGEMRIC and T2 were evaluated using Spearman's Rho and tested for significance. The analysis of all six cartilage ROIs for all subjects resulted in a significant (p < 0 .001) negative correlation (Rho = −0.50) between the dGEMRIC index (T1post) and the T1ρ relaxation time. The dGEMRIC index and T2 correlated positive (Rho = 0.55) and significant (p < 0 .001). Although this pilot study has a small sample size a negative correlation between dGEMRIC and T1ρ was found in patients with DDH. Both methods are known to probe the PG content of cartilage, where a decreased PG content leads to lower dGEMRIC index and an increased T1ρ value. The correlation coefficient was moderate, but significant, which shows that T1ρ mapping as an effective tool to probe the cartilage PG content similar to dGEMRIC. A comparable, but positive correlation was found between dGEMRIC and T2. T2 is sensitive to the cartilage collagen content with a decreased T2 value in degenerated cartilage. In symptomatic DDH, where an onset of OA is assumed, both PG depletion and collagen decay are in progress and can be evaluated using these mapping techniques.
Cam-type femoral acetabular impingement (FAI), is a common structural hip deformity and thought to be a leading cause of early hip osteoarthritis. Although patients who undergo surgical correction notice improved clinical function it is unclear what impact this has on the overall health of the cartilage. T1rho MRI cartilage mapping has been shown to be a reliable imaging technique to assess the proteoglycan (PG) content potentially serving as a biomarker. This study analyses post surgical changes in T1rho levels in hip joints treated with cam FAI. Eleven patients with a mean age of 38 (all males) underwent pre and post T1Rho Cartilage mapping of their hips at a mean time of 20 months post surgical intervention. The acetabulum was spatially divided into 4 main regions of interest (ROI), with levels of T1Rho in cartilage quantified as a whole and in each spatial segment. T1Rho signal is inversely correlated with level of PG content. All patients demonstrated loss of PG content on pre-op imaging with a T1Rho of 33.5ms+2.6ms. Preop T1rho levels were found to significantly correlated with the difference between pre-op and post-op T1rho in entire hip cartilage (R: 0.73; p=0.016). This correlation was reflected both in the anterolateral quadrant (R: 0.86; p=0.002), and in the posteriosuperior quadrant (R:0.70; p=0.035). Additionally, significant correlation was found between improvement of WOMAC pain score over time, and difference of T1rho values over time in the most lateral 3mm slice of the anterolateral quadrant (R: 0.81; p=0.045). Significant correlation was found between pre-op alpha angle at 1:30 and difference between pre-op and post-op total cartilage T1rho content (R: −065;p=0.038). T1Rho Cartilage mapping of the hip is a useful biomarker in the assessment of the surgical management of Cam type FAI. This preliminary data provides some evidence that surgical correction of the deformity can help minimise disease progression.
The importance of femoral head-neck morphology in the development of early hip osteoarthritis is recognized in femeroacetabular impingement (FAI), however no studies have examined FAI morphology in the developing hip, i.e. pre-closure of the proximal femoral physis. We developed a pilot project to study prevalence of CAM-type FAI hip morphology in both the pre- and post-closure proximal femoral physes of asymptomatic children using MR-imaging. We also examined biologic markers possibly related to FAI etiology, including Vitamin D metabolites, BMI, family history, and activity levels. Recruitment included volunteers with asymptomatic lower extremities, and either pre- or post-closure of the proximal femoral physis. Males were 10–12 years (pre-closure) or 15–18 years (post-closure); females were 8–10 years or 14 18 years. Phlebotomy and urine sampling were used to assess metabolic markers. MRI of bilateral hips and a clinical exam including hip impingement tests were conducted. MR imaging assessment was independent and blinded and recorded using established parameters including alpha angles measured at both the 3:00 (anterior head-neck junction) and 1:30 (antero-superior head-neck junction) radial image positions.Purpose
Method
Controversy exists regarding the optimal technique for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this multicentre randomized double-blind controlled study was to compare the functional outcomes and healing rates of double-row suture techniques with single row repair. Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomized to receive either a double row (DR) or single row (SR) repair. The primary objective was to compare the WORC score at 24 months. Secondary objectives included anatomical outcomes by MRI or ultrasound, the Constant, and ASES scores. A sample size calculation determined that 84 patients provided 80% power with a 50% effect size to detect a statistical difference between groups.Purpose
Method
Controversy exists regarding the optimal technique of subscapularis mobilization during shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this multicentre randomized double-blind study was to compare the functional outcomes and healing rates of the lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) to the subscapularis tenotomy (ST). Patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty were randomized to receive either a LTO or ST. The primary outcome was to compare subscapularis strength, as measured by an electronic hand-held dynamometer at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included range of motion, WOOS, Constant and ASES scores. A sample size calculation determined that 80 patients provided 80% power with a 50% effect size to detect a significant difference between groups.Purpose
Method