Introduction

Metal on metal hip resurfacing (MMHR) has been advocated for the younger patient for several reasons including for the preservation of bone stock and ease of revision to total hip replacement (THR), thus ‘buying an additional operation’ for the patient. This rationale however assumes a good functional outcome after the revision to a THR and that the results of the ‘revision primary’ will not be compromised by the resurfacing which preceded it. We present our data on a consecutive series of 68 revised MMHRs.

We investigated the blood flow to the femoral head during and after Resurfacing Arthroplasty of the hip.

In a previous study, we recorded the intra-operative blood flow in 12 patients who had a posterior approach to the hip and 12 who had a trochanteric flip approach. Using a LASER Doppler flowmeter, we found a 40% drop in blood flow in the posterior group and an 11% drop in the trochanteric flip group (p<0.001). The aim of this current study was to find out whether the intra-operative fall in blood flow persists during the post-operative period.

We therefore conducted a Single Positron Emission Tomography (SPECT) scan on 14 of the same group of patients. The proximal femur was divided into four regions of interest. These were the mid-shaft, proximal shaft, inter-trochanteric and head-neck regions. The data was analysed for bone activity and comparisons made between the two groups for each region of the femur. We found that the bone activity in the mid-shaft, upper-shaft, and head-neck regions was the same eleven months after the surgery irrespective of the approach to the hip. However there was higher activity in the trochanteric flip group in the inter-trochanteric region.

We conclude that the intra-operative deficit in blood flow to the head-neck region of the hip associated with the posterior approach does not seem to persist in the late post-operative period. We believe the reason for increased bone activity in inter-trochanteric region to be due to the healing of the trochanteric flip osteotomy.

We used a laser Doppler flow-meter with high energy (20 m W) laser (Moor Instruments Ltd. Milwey, UK) to measure the blood flow to the femoral head during resurfacing arthroplasty.

Twenty-four hips were studied; 12 underwent a posterior approach and twelve a Ganz's trochanteric flip osteotomy. The approach was determined according to surgeon preference. Three patients were excluded, The exclusion criteria were previous hip surgery, history of hip fracture and avascular necrosis (AVN). All patients had the hybrid implant with cemented femoral component.

During surgery a 2.0mm drill bit was passed via the lateral femoral cortex to the superior part of the head neck junction. The position was confirmed using fluoroscopy. The measurements were taken during five stages of the operation: when the fascia lata was opened (baseline), at the end of soft tissue dissection, following dislocation of the hip, after relocation back into the socket, after inserting the implants prior to closing the soft tissues and, finally, at the end of soft tissue closure.

The results were analysed and the values were normalised to a percentage of the baseline value. We found a mean drop of 38.6 % in the blood flow during the posterior approach and a drop of 10.34% with the trochanteric flip approach. The significant drop occured between the baseline (1st stage) and the end of the soft-tissue dissection (2nd stage). In both groups the blood flow remained relatively constant afterwards.

Our study shows that there is a highly significant drop in blood flow (p<0.001) during the posterior approach compared with the trochanteric flip approach.

Introduction: Pain and mass lesions around hip resurfacing are reported with increasing frequency. The aetiology is unknown but reaction to metal wear debris and mechanical impingement have both been suggested. We are aware of a group of our patients with significant pain following resurfacing. We sought to correlate metal ion levels with X-ray findings and any local soft tissue reaction around the prosthesis.

Methods: Patients with significant groin pain following hip resurfacing were identified from routine clinics. Blood was tested for cobalt and chromium levels using inductively coupled mass spectrometry in all patients. Cup abduction angle and femoral stem version were estimated from plain radiographs. Patients underwent ultrasound scan (USS) of the affected hip joint. Bilateral prostheses were excluded to avoid confounding.

Results: 47 unilateral painful hip resurfacings (24 female) were identified. USS was performed in 42 patients and was abnormal in 25 (15 female). Abnormalities ranged from simple joint effusion with or without synovial thickening, through to cystic masses in the posterior joint and solid masses related to the ileopsoas tendon similar to the appearances previously described in pseudotumours.

A two sample t-test demonstrated cobalt and chromium ion levels were significantly higher in patients with abnormalities on USS (p=0.038, p=0.05 respectively), patients with normal USS were more likely to have a retroverted femoral component (p=0.01).

Discussion: We describe two groups of patients with a painful hip resurfacing: those with raised metal ions and local soft tissue reaction, and those with lower metal ions and no soft tissue reaction. The retroverted stems in the second group could cause an iatrogenic cam-type impingement. Metal ion levels are useful to guide further imaging. Raised levels should prompt investigation for a soft tissue abnormality with either USS or MRI, lower levels suggest investigation should look for mechanical impingement with imaging such as CT.

Narrowing of the femoral neck after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip has been described previously in both cemented and uncemented hip resurfacing. Traditionally hip resurfacing has been performed via a posterior approach though other surgical approaches including the Ganz and the anterolateral approach have been well described. In addition it is known that the blood supply of the femoral neck arises largely from posterior structures and it has been postulated that neck narrowing is a consequence of poor post-operative femoral neck vascularity. Our null hypothesis in this study was that the choice of surgical approach does not influence postoperative femoral neck narrowing. We retrospectively measured the diameter of the femoral neck in a series of 135 consecutive patients who underwent uncemented cormet hip resurfacing, with follow up from one to 3 years. Our sample included 50 females and 85 men with an average age of 56.4 years (standard deviation of 9.47). Seventy six patients had a Ganz approach, 5 had an anterolateral approach and 55 had a posterior approach. There were no failures due to femoral neck fracture and no revisions to total hip arthroplasty. Eleven patients required subsequent surgery all of which were due to complications following trochanteric osteotomy. Seven patients needed removal of metalwork and 4 patients had non-union of their osteotomy requiring revision. At one year the posterior approach group had an average of 5.2% neck narrowing versus 2.7% neck narrowing in the Ganz approach group (p value 0.06). At three years the average neck narrowing amongst all patients was 6.8% (standard deviation 3.1%) but the number of patients who had had a Ganz approach was too small to meaningfully apply inference statistics. Our study shows early results which show a statistically significant reduction in the rate of femoral neck narrowing in patients who have had a Ganz approach as compared to a posterior approach for unce-mented hip resurfacing arthroplasty. It also shows a high rate of complications inherent with the Ganz approach which in our patient group are entirely related to the trochanteric osteotomy.

Introduction: Hip resurfacing has become re-established in recent years as a viable option in younger, active individuals. The results of a multi-centre evaluation of the Cormet resurfacing device are presented.

Materials and Methods: Data has been entered from 1997 onwards from 5 centres, patients being selected as suitable by 8 individual surgeons. Pre and intraoperative details recorded including indications, patient details, implant used, Harris Hip Score (HHS) and surgical approach.

Results: A total of 781 procedures in 676 patients have been recorded (54% posterior approach, 40% antero-lateral, 6% Ganz approach). The mean follow-up is 2.5 years (0.1–9.7 yrs) and the mean postoperative HHS is 85.9 (range 25–100). The mean age at surgery was 54.2 years. 60% of implantations were on male patients. The principal diagnosis was; OA 87%, RA 5%, AVN, post-traumatic OA and DDH 2% each, Perthes 1% and the remainder 1%. It is thought likely that many cases of OA had many of the above-named pathologies as a precursor. The mean maximum flexion postoperatively was 98.6 degrees. Uncemented heads (a recent innovation) were used in 7%. Kaplan-Meier survivorship is 93% at 9 years. In the OA subgroup 3.3% have been revised, approximately equal numbers for femoral head collapse, dislocation and cup loosening, but the vast majority due to femoral neck fracture, which in turn was generally associated with the posterior approach.

Conclusions: The results of this cohort (which includes the learning period of the contributing surgeons) indicate highly satisfactory outcomes in terms of HHS and implant longevity. Sub-classification of cases into those presenting abnormal anatomy and those with ‘ordinary’ OA indicates better survivorship still in the latter group. The surgical challenge varies more with hip resurfacing than with standard hip arthroplasty and this should be considered when results of surgery are reviewed. The revision options are generally much simpler than after standard THR.

Introduction: Two major complications of hip resurfacing arthroplasty are avascular necrosis of the femoral head and femoral neck fracture. Both are thought to be precipitated by disruption of the blood supply to the femoral head and neck during the approach to the hip joint. Ganz et al have described their technique of approaching the hip joint using a “trochanteric flip” osteotomy. This has the theoretical advantage of preserving the medial femoral circumflex artery to the femoral head. The aim of this study was to compare the intra-operative femoral head blood flow during the Ganz flip osteotomy to the blood flow during a posterior approach for resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.

Methods: The intra-operative measurements of blood flow were performed using a DRT laser Doppler flow-meter with a 20 mW laser and a fibreoptic probe. The probe was introduced into the lateral femoral cortex and threaded into the femoral head under image intensifier control. Measurements were recorded before the approach to the hip was performed, after the approach was performed but before the head was dislocated, and after the head was dislocated.

Results: Our initial results indicate that there is on average a 50% drop in the blood flow to the femoral head after a posterior approach to the hip joint. In contrast, the trochanteric flip osteotomy produces a much smaller fall of around 18%. We have used these results to inform a sample size calculation, and are currently recruiting further patients to achieve a total of 42 in order to confirm a statistically significant effect.

Conclusion: The Ganz trochanteric flip osteotomy appears to produce less damage to the blood supply to the femoral head during resurfacing arthroplasty than the posterior approach. This study will inform surgeons in deciding on their preference for a routine approach for hip resurfacing.

Background: Hip resurfacing preserves bone stock on the femoral head. Some authors believe that this is at the expense of sacrificing more bone on the acetabulum and they point out two main reasons for this. Since resurfacing tends to be used in younger and more active individuals a larger head to neck ratio seems desirable in order to provide a better range of movement before impingement. In addition, the acetabular component has to be a minimum of 5 mm thick to prevent deformation on implantation and the subsequent compromise in the congruency of the bearings.

Method: We report the average size of the acetabular components of 220 Cormet resurfacings and 199 Pinnacle cups implanted in our department over a period of 18 months. From these sizes we estimated the mean acetabular bone loss for each procedure.

Results: The mean cup size was 53.7 mm for Cormet and 54.1 mm for Pinnacle i.e. the acetabular component of the resurfacing was smaller than the equivalent uncemented total hip replacement.

Conclusions: These figures show that resurfacing arthroplasty does not necessarily lead to greater acetabular bone loss than a total hip replacement. In our practice, we concentrate upon preserving acetabular bone rather than establishing a large head to neck ratio. In spite of this approach, the occurrence of impingement and dislocation among our patients seems to be as rare as in other comparable series.

Introduction: Hip resurfacing has become re-established in recent years as a viable option in younger, active individuals. The results of a multi-centre evaluation of the Cormet resurfacing device are presented.

Methods: Data has been entered from 1997 onwards from 5 centres, patients being selected as suitable by 8 individual surgeons. Pre and intraoperative details recorded including indications, patient details, implant used, Harris Hip Score (HHS) and surgical approach.

Results: A total of 905 procedures in 782 patients have been recorded (52% posterior approach, 39% anterolateral 9% Ganz approach). The mean follow-up is 2.8 years (0.1–9.5 yrs) and the mean postoperative HHS is 86.1 (range 25–100). The mean age at surgery was 54.4 years. 61% of patients were male. The principal diagnosis was; OA 88.3%, RA 4.3%, AVN 2.1%, posttraumatic OA 1.1%, DDH 2.1%, Perthes 0.7% and the remainder 1.4%. It is thought likely that many cases of OA had many of the above-named pathologies as a precursor. The mean maximum flexion postoperatively was 98.7 degrees. Uncemented heads (a recent innovation) were used in 10%. Kaplan-Meier survivorship is 93% at 9 to 10 years. Survivorship in the OA subgroup was 96.7% with approximately equal numbers for femoral head collapse, dislocation and cup loosening, but the vast majority due to femoral neck fracture, which in turn was generally associated with the posterior approach.

Discussion: The results of this cohort (including all contributors’ learning curves) indicate highly satisfactory outcomes in terms of HHS and implant longevity. Subclassification of cases into those presenting abnormal anatomy and those with ‘ordinary’ OA indicates better survivorship still in the latter group. The surgical challenge varies more with hip resurfacing than with standard hip arthroplasty and this should be considered when results of surgery are reviewed. The revision options are generally much simpler than after standard THR.

We used Laser Doppler flowmetry to measure the effect on the blood flow to the femoral head/neck junction of two surgical approaches during resurfacing arthroplasty. We studied 24 hips undergoing resurfacing arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Of these, 12 had a posterior approach and 12 a trochanteric flip approach. A Laser probe was placed under radiological control in the superolateral part of the femoral head/neck junction. The Doppler flux was measured at stages of the operation and compared with the initial flux. In both groups the main fall in blood flow occurred during the initial exposure and capsulotomy of the hip joint.

There was a greater reduction in blood flow with the posterior (40%) than with the trochanteric flip approach (11%).

Tibiofemoral alignment has a direct correlation with the survival of total knee arthroplasty. Traditionally, it has been measured using a goniometer on radiographs. We describe new software which measures this alignment on scanned radiographs by automatically detecting bones in the image.

Two surgeons used conventional methods and two clerical officers used the computerised routine to assess 58 radiographs of the knee on two occasions. There were no significant differences between any of the paired comparisons. The largest mean difference detected was 1.19°. Across all comparisons, the mean correlation was 0.755. A standardised routine for measuring tibiofemoral alignment was the greatest factor in reducing error in our study.

These results show that non-medical staff can reliably use the software to measure tibiofemoral alignment. It has the potential to measure all the parameters recommended by the Knee Society.