Biomechanical stability is important for fracture healing. With standard plate and screw constructs, longer plates with screws well spaced, near and far from the fracture site, are biomechanically superior. Newer locked plates have been shown to be superior to conventional plating for difficult fractures. The ideal screw configuration for fixation with locked plates has yet to be addressed. This study investigates the effects of screw position on construct stiffness as well as strain in both the plate and bone during fixation of a diaphyseal comminuted fracture using a locking plate with bicortical fixation. A composite cylinder (Sawbones) was machined to produce two models:
(a) comminuted model (4mm gap) and (b) whole model (no gap) to simulate the remodelling phase. Five strain gauges were mounted to the bone models and one between the center holes of the locking plate. Four different configurations of screw number and position were evaluated using a twelve-hole locking plate (Smith &
Nephew Perilock). Plate holes were numbered on each side of the gap from one to six. Screw configuration 654321, 621, 654 and 321 were tested in four-point bending on an MTS 858 Mini-Bionix. Force (N) and displacement (mm) as well as strain readings were recorded at 10 Hz. Plate strain in the gap model did not vary significantly for the different configurations. Construct stiffness of the 654 model (all screws far from gap) showed a 30% decrease in stiffness as compared to other screw configurations (p<
0.001). In the whole bone model, the maximal bone strain was outside the farthest screw from the center of the plate (stress shielding) and bone strain at the fracture site in 654 was significantly higher than in 621 (p<
0.001). Results showed that three screw fixation produced similar construct stiffness to a six screw construct when well spaced. Three screws placed far from the fracture gap (654) as compared to three screws evenly spaced (621) showed decreased stability in the comminuted model but resulted in increased bone strain at the fracture site in the whole bone model. All configurations produced similar plate strain.
There is theoretical concern that volar plating has a disadvantage in cantilever bending when axially loaded dorsal to the neutral axis. This has implications for postoperative rehabilitation protocols and overall outcomes related to maintenance of reduction. Most recent biomechanical studies have compared volar locking plates to traditional dorsal non-locked plates. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability of volar and dorsal locking plate fixation in a model of dorsally unstable distal radius fractures. Fourteen synthetic composite radii (Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA) were used for this study. A dorsally unstable, extra-articular distal radius fracture was simulated by creating a dorsal wedge-shaped defect in the distal metaphysis. Half of the specimens were plated dorsally (n=7) while the other half were plated volarly (n=7) with 2.4mm distal radius locking T-plates (Synthes, Canada). Each specimen was loaded axially in five different positions: central (along the neutral axis of the radius) as well as dorsal, volar, radial and ulnar to the neutral axis using a MTS Sintech 1/G materials testing machine (MTS Systems, Eden Prairie, MN). The plated radii were loaded to 100 N in each position simulating physiological loading during normal range of motion. The main outcome measure was construct stiffness of the plate-bone system (slope of load-displacement curve) for all five loading positions. Construct stiffness with dorsal locking plates was seven times greater than volar locking plates when dorsally loaded (p <
0.001), 60% greater when centrally loaded (p = 0.055) and 35% greater when volarly loaded (p = 0.029). There was no significant difference in stiffness with any other loading configurations. The stability of dorsal locking plate fixation is superior to volar locking plate fixation in the setting of large dorsal defects in the distal radius. This is applicable to both fractures with dorsal comminution and dorsal opening-wedge distal radial osteotomies. Further clinical investigation is needed to compare functional outcomes and complication rates between modern dorsal and volar locking plate techniques.
The purpose of this study was to clarify the effect of delay of the reattachment of the supraspinatus tendon into a bony trough to the strength of the repaired tendon-bone complex. The supraspinatus tendon of rabbits were transected and reattached into bony troughs at the greater tuberosity immediately and six weeks after transection. The tensile strength of the tendon-bone complex, harvested twelve weeks after reattachment, were measured. The tensile strength showed no difference between immediate and delayed reattached shoulders. Six weeks delay of supraspinatus tendon repair seems not to weaken the tensile strength of repaired tendon-bone complex. The purpose of this study was to clarify the effect of timing of surgery on the strength of the supraspinatus tendon-bone complex after the reimplantation of the tendon into a bony trough. In eight rabbits, the supraspinatus tendon was transected and reinserted into a bony trough at the greater tuberosity (early reattachment group). In seven rabbits, the supraspinatus tendon was reinserted six weeks after transection (delayed reattachment group). In both groups, the rabbits were sacrificed twelve weeks after reattachment, and the tensile strength of the tendon-bone complex was measured. The contralateral shoulders served as controls. None of the operated tendons failed at the site of reimplantation. The ratio of tensile strength of the operated tendon-bone complex to the controls showed no difference between two groups (Immediate reattachment group: 79.9± 1 S.E. 16.5%, delayed reattachment group: 80.4± 12.6%, P>
0.05). This is the first experimental study to compare the tensile strength of supraspinatus tendon-bone complex repaired after different time intervals. Stress-shielded tendon &
bone tend to decrease their tensile strength. Given the six weeks duration of detachment, a weaker tensile strength of delayed reattachment group was expected than of the early reattachment group. The fact that both groups did not show a difference might be due to the recovery of tensile strength of tendon &
bone in twelve weeks after reattachment. Six weeks delay of repair of supraspinatus tendon does not weaken the tensile strength of repaired tendon-bone complex.