Three materials were used for this study: a short-duration retrieved mobile-bearing conforming tibial insert with minimal oxidation (non-oxidized); a shelf-aged, oxidized, non-conforming fixed bearing tibial insert (oxidized); and standard NIST 1050 bar stock (NIST). Utilizing both conforming and non-conforming devices tests the technique over a range of articular curvatures, while testing a highly oxidized material tests the feasibility of maintaining the native surface when machining wear pins with compromised mechanical properties. FTIR analysis was performed at the articular surface of the devices near where the pins were taken, using ketone peak height as an indicator of oxidation. Wear rates were determined using a six station AMTI OrthoPod with an applied load of 100 N in multidirectional motion for a total of 2 million cycles. The oxidized material had a surface ketone level of 0.26, the non-oxidized device had a ketone level of 0.05, and the NIST sample had a ketone level less than 0.01. Two pins of each material were machined to ¼″ diameter with a length of the through thickness of the tibial inserts; soak controls were also produced. Figure 1 shows mass loss data for all six pins tested. Wear rates between the two pins of each group were fairly repeatable, and the wear rates of the different groups could be easily differentiated. The pins machined from NIST bar stock showed the best match-up, but pins machined from retrieved devices also showed good repeatability, with the non-conforming device showing better results than the conforming device. The ability to produce repeatable wear results with pins machined from