Implant fracture of modular revision stems is a major complication after total hip arthroplasty revision (rTHA). Studies looking at specific modular designs report fracture rates of 0.3% to 0.66% whereas fractures of monobloc designs are only reported anecdotally. It is unclear whether the overall re-revision rate of modular designs is higher and if, whether stem fractures or other revision reasons are responsible for this elevation.

All revisions within 5 years after implantation of a revision stems (n₀=13,900; n₅=2506) were analysed using Cox regression with design (modular: n=17, monobloc: n=27), BMI, Sex and Elixhauser Score as independent variables. One stage and two stage revisions were analysed separately (1-stage: modular n= 7,102; monobloc n= 4,542; 2-stage: 1,551 / 704). The revision volume of the hospitals was also considered (low: <20 revisions, medium: 21–50 revisions, high: >50 revisions).

For the 1-stage revisions, the re-revision risk after 4 years was 14,3% [13.2%, 15.5%] for monobloc and 17.4% [16.40%, 18.40%] for modular stems (p< 0.001). Stem fracture was the reason for re-revision in 2.4% of the modular (fracture rate 0.42%) and 0.6% of the monobloc revisions. The difference in re-revision rates between the designs was mainly due to differences in dislocation and stem loosening. For the 2-stage revisions, the revision risks for either design were similar (21.7% [18,5%, 25.4%] vs. 23.0% [20.8%, 25.4%]; p=0.05). Patient characteristics influenced the comparison between the two designs in the 1-stage group but very little in the 2-stage group.

Modular revision stem fractures only contribute very minor to re-revision risk. In 2-stage revisions, no difference in overall re-revision rates between designs was observed. This might indicate that the differences observed for 1-stage procedures are due to differences between the patient cohorts, not reflected by the parameters available or surgeon choice.

The early revision rate in elective Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) three years after surgery in elderly patients over 80 years is significantly lower for cemented stems in the German Arthroplasty Register (EPRD): cemented 3,1% (3.0 – 3.2) vs. uncemented 4.2% (4.1 – 4.3; p < 0.001). However, the mortality rate in elderly patients is elevated for cemented fixation. This study presents a detailed analysis of the influence of stem type and fixation on revision and mortality rate in this patient cohort.

Elective primary THA cases for primary Coxarthrosis using uncemented cups from the EPRD data base were analysed (n₀= 37,183). Four stem type groups were compared: cementless, cementless with collar, cementless short, and cemented. Stems with at least 300 cases at risk three years after surgery were analysed individually. The reference stem was determined as the stem with the lowest revision rate and at least 1000 cases under surveillance 3 years after surgery (n₃ = 28,637).

The revision rate for cemented stems (2.5% [2.2–1.81] was lower than for uncemented (4.5% [4.2–4.9]; p<0.001) and uncemented short stems (4.2% [3.1–5.7]; p=0.002). The revision rate of uncemented collared stems (2.3% [1.5–3.6]) was similar to cemented stems (p=0.89) and lower than for uncemented stems (p=0.02). One year mortality showed no sig. differences between the groups (p>0.17): cemented 3.2% [2.9–3.6], uncemented 3.4% [3.1–3.7], uncemented short 3.5% [2.5–4.9], uncemented collar 2.0% [1.2–3.2].

“Cementless” and “cementless short” stems should not be used in patients over 80 years due to the higher revision risk. If cementing should be avoided, “cementless collared” stems seem to be a good alternative combined with a tendency for a lower one year mortality rate.

Aims

Registry studies on modified acetabular polyethylene (PE) liner designs are limited. We investigated the influence of standard and modified PE acetabular liner designs on the revision rate for mechanical complications in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Special acetabular polyethylene (PE) liners are intended to increase the stability of the artificial hip joint, yet registry studies on them are limited. The pupose of this study was to investigate differences in revision rates for mechanical complications in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) with standard and special PE acetabular liners in patients with ostheoarthritis.

Data from the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD) between 2012 until 2020 were analysed. Patients with diagnosed ostheoarthritis of the hip without relevant prior surgeries, who received a primary cementless THA with a ceramic/PE bearing articulation were included. Cumulative incidences of revision for mechanical complications for Standard and 4 special PE liners (Lipped, Increased Offset, Angulated, Angulated|Increased Offset) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier Estimator. Confounding factors were investigated with a Cox proportional-hazards model.

In total 151.104 cases were included. 7-year unadjusted revision-free survival for mechanical complications compared to Standard liners (97.7%) was lower for Angulated (97.4%), Lipped (97.2%) and Angulated|Increased Offset liners (94.7%), but higher for Increased Offset liners (98.1%). Risk of revision for mechanical complications was not significantly different between Standard, Lipped and Angulated liners. Increased Offset liners (HR=0.68; 95% CI=0.5–0.92) reduced, while Angulated|Increased Offset liners (HR= 1.81; 95% CI=1.38–2.36) increased the risk. Higher age at admission and an Elixhauser comorbidity index greater zero increased the risk, whereas a larger liner share slightly reduced the risk.

Only the use of Increased Offset liners reduced the risk of revision for mechanical complications compared to Standard liners — other special liners did not.

The influence of the surgical process on implant loosening and periprosthetic fractures (PPF) as major complications in uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) have rarely been studied due to the difficult quantification. Meanwhile registry analyses have clearly shown a decrease in complications with increasing experience. The goal of this study was to determine the extent of variability in THA stem implantation between highly experienced surgeons with respect to implant-size, -position, press-fit, contact area, primary stability and the effect of using a powered impaction tool.

Primary hip stems were implanted in 16 cadaveric femur pairs by three experienced surgeons using manual and powered impaction. Quantitative CTs were taken before and after each process step and stem tilt, canal-fill-ratio, pressfit and contact area between bone and implant determined. 11 femur pairs were additionally tested for primary stability under cyclic loading conditions.

Higher variations in press-fit and contact area between the surgeons for manual impactions compared to powered were observed. Stem tilt and implant sizing varied between surgeons but not between impaction methods. Larger stems exhibited less micromotion compared to smaller stems.

Larger implants may increase PPF risk, while smaller implants reduce primary stability. The reduced variation for powered impactions indicates that appropriate measures may promote a more standardized process. The observed variations between the experienced surgeons may represent the acceptable range for this specific stem design. Variability in the implantation process warrants further investigations since certain deviations e.g. a stem tilt towards varus, might increase bone stresses and PPF risk.

Aims

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPF) are a serious complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and are becoming an increasingly common indication for revision arthroplasty with the ageing population. This study aimed to identify potential risk factors for PPF based on an analysis of registry data.

Background

Post-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) are a devastating complication associated with high mortality and are costly. Few risk factors are modifiable apart from implant choice. The design features governing risk of PFF are unknown. We estimated the 90-day risk of revision for PFF associated with design features of cementless femoral stems and to investigate the effect of a collar on early PFF risk using a biomechanical in-vitro model.

Taper corrosion in Total Hip Arthroplasty has surfaced as a clinically relevant problem and has recently also been reported for metal heads against polyethylene. Low neck stiffness is a critical contributing factor. Catastrophic taper failures have been reported for one particular stem design with a small V-40 taper made from a less stiff titanium-alloy. The purpose of this study was to identify factors involved in the failure process.

31 revised CoCr heads ranging from 32 to 44m diameter combined with TMZF-Titanium alloy stem with a V-40 taper (Accolade I) were analysed. Stems were only available for catastrophic failure cases with dis-association (n=8) or taper fracture (n=1). Clinical data were limited to time-in-situ, patient gender and age.

Head material loss increased with time in situ (r²=0.49, p<0.001). Longer heads and material loss exceeding 15mm³ showed bottoming out and consecutive catastrophic stem taper failure. Heads with failed stem tapers were all 36mm diameter.

The head starts rotating on the stem taper after bottoming out, causing major abrasive wear, ultimately resulting in catastrophic failure; it is surprising that these catastrophic cases did not exhibit clinical symptoms due to raised Co and Cr metal ions, which must have resulted from the large amount of CoCr lost from the female head taper. This would have attracted medical attention and prevented catastrophic failure by taper dis-association.

Control exams of patients treated with the respective stem type in combination with large CoCr heads should include metal ion determination in blood or serum, even if no clinical symptoms are present, in order to detect taper corrosion before catastrophic failure occurs.

The early failure and revision of bimodular primary total hip arthroplasty prostheses requires the identification of the risk factors for material loss and wear at the taper junctions through taper wear analysis. Deviations in taper geometries between revised and pristine modular neck tapers were determined using high resolution tactile measurements. A new algorithm was developed and validated to allow the quantitative analysis of material loss, complementing the standard visual inspection currently used.

The algorithm was applied to a sample of 27 retrievals (in situ from 2.9 to 38.1 months) of the withdrawn Rejuvenate modular prosthesis. The mean wear volumes on the flat distal neck piece taper was 3.35 mm³ (0.55 to 7.57), mainly occurring in a characteristic pattern in areas with high mechanical loading. Wear volume tended to increase with time to revision (r² = 0.423, p = 0.001). Implant and patient specific data (offset, stem size, patient’s mass, age and body mass index) did not correlate with the amount of material loss observed (p >  0.078). Bilaterally revised implants showed higher amounts of combined total material loss and similar wear patterns on both sides. The consistent wear pattern found in this study has not been reported previously, suggesting that the device design and materials are associated with the failure of this prosthesis.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1350–7.