Unstable dorsal fracture/dislocation of PIP joint is a complex injury and difficult to treat. Different treatment methods have been described with varying results. We describe a novel technique to combine fracture fixation with volar plate repair using micro anchor suture. Between July and December 2005, 11 consecutive patients with unstable dorsal PIP joint dislocations underwent open reduction and volar plate repair using our technique. Nine patients had dorsal fracture dislocations and two had open dislocations. All patients were males and their average age was 26 years. All patients were reviewed with the minimum follow up of 12 months. The pain score, range of movements and grip strength were recorded and compared to the normal side.Introduction
Material and methods
Review causes of anchor fixation failures in patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Between 2003 and 2006, 650 arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs were performed by the senior author. Of these, anchor fixation failure occurred in fifteen patients. A retrospective review was undertaken to find out the reasons for their failure.Aim
Methods
Displaced two- to four-part fractures of the proximal humerus pose a difficult therapeutic challenge. We report the results of internal fixation of these fractures in a case series of 50 patients with a locking plate system. All fractures united with no failure of fixation. The mean constant score was 79. One patient developed avascular necrosis. Internal fixation with locking plate system in healthy active patients, disregarding their age, is a reliable method of treating displaced proximal humerus fractures. The tuberosities should be restored anatomically prior to plate application. Surgical expertise in treating shoulder conditions is essential for good functional outcome.
Symptomatic neglected and displaced three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures are often difficult to reconstruct. Replacement has been reported to give poor functional outcome and hence is not the ideal treatment option. We report our results of secondary reconstruction of these difficult fractures with a locking plate system. Between 2003 and 2005, 15 healthy active patients with displaced three- to four-part fractures underwent revision/secondary open reduction and internal fixation with a locking plate system (Philos, Stratec UK Ltd). Ten patients had delayed presentation. Three patients had failed previous internal fixation. One patient had non-union and one had malunited fracture. Their average age was 63 years. Objective assessment was measured by the Constant score, subjective assessment by the Oxford questionnaire. The mean follow-up was 14 months.Introduction
Material and methods
We assessed a new knotless anchor system (Opus AutoCuff, ArthroCare Sports Medicine), which was designed to repair torn rotator cuffs. This knotless anchor winches cuff tissue into the bone with a mattress suture that is cinched into place without the need for knots. We reviewed patients who underwent arthroscopic repair with this technique with a minimum follow up of one year. This is prospective study of a consecutive series of the first one hundred patients who underwent arthroscopic cuff repair with the Autocuff system in 2005. Nine were lost to follow-up leaving ninety-one were available for review. All sizes of cuff tear were addressed and in all one hundred and eighty anchors were deployed. There were thirty seven men and sixty seven women with an average age of 69.4 years (range 36–85 years) Follow-up was by clinical assessment, cuff ultrasound and plain radiographs one year after surgery (12–20 months). Pain relief was described as good to excellent in 93% of patients and Constant scores improved by an average of 34 points with 48.5% being good to excellent, 39.4% fair and 12.1% poor. Nine anchors (5%) in eight patients had pulled out at one year, of which three were symptomatic. Suture repair poses varied points of weakness; loose knots, suture attrition and screw toggle all contribute to failure. We have shown that cuff repair by this method appears to be effective up to one year. It is important, however, to spread the tension of the repair with more than one anchor when treating larger tears.
Introduced in 2005, the Opus Magnum (Arthrocare) anchor has been used in our unit for repair of rotator cuff tears. It is a non-screw type anchor which relies on the deployment of wings locked in the subchondral bone. In order to evaluate whether these anchors migrate after implantation we undertook radiographic examination of their placement at intervals. We attempted to assess whether loss of fixation could be secondary to osteoporosis. Between 2005 and 2006, 106 patients (59 female, 47 male) aged 35–84 years (average age 62 years) underwent arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears with a total of 229 anchors. A review of radiographs taken at six weeks and 12 months post-insertion was undertaken. Cortical index of the proximal humeral diaphysis was measured from the AP radiograph indicating bone density; this involved measuring humeral width and medullary cavity diameter at a fixed point of 10cm below the greater tuberosity of the humerus. At six weeks follow-up there were no anchor pull-outs seen on radiographs. At 12 months follow-up 10 of the 229 anchors were found to have pulled out of the bone, equating to a failure rate of 4%. Of these seven of the 10 patients were asymptomatic. The average cortical index was found to be significantly lower in the failure group. Bone quality at the greater tuberosity of the humerus can be insufficient to withstand the tensions developed in newer anchor technology, leading to anchor migration. We present evidence that radiographs may be sufficient to influence the clinician’s choice of anchorage device. An economic estimation of bone density would be a helpful predictor of pull-out strength of suture anchors, essentially a low cortical index would indicate that these anchors are more likely to fail. A routine radiograph at 12 months would also identify the asymptomatic anchor failures.
We review our results of arthroscopic capsular plication in patients with ligamentous laxity that had developed symptoms of instability after a traumatic event. Between 2004 and 2005, 115 patients with traumatic injury to their shoulder underwent arthroscopic stabilization and repair of their shoulder. Of these, twelve patients had ligamentous laxity and had their capsule plicated as a means to stabilize their shoulder. All had failed three months of biofeedback physiotherapy. The mean age of the patients was 29 years (range 17 to 46). The average time interval between date of injury and surgery was 21 months. They were reviewed retrospectively with a minimum follow up of 2 yeats. The functional outcome was assessed by Constant scoring system and Rowe score. At arthroscopy, capsular plication with a south to north direction would be fashioned with #1 PDS sutures. In multidirectional instability, the inferior and posterior capsule would be plicated as well. If the labrum was torn, this and the capsule would be repaired together. The repair was reinforced with rotator interval closure. Postoperatively the arm was rested in sling for four weeks followed by gradual mobilization. At a minimum follow up of two years, all twelve shoulders became stable. There were 8 excellent, 3 good and one fair result as graded by modified Rowe score. Re-arthroscopy in the patient with fair result showed good capsular repair and presence of scar tissue in the subacromial space. All patients rated their shoulder as normal. Ten patients returned to their preinjury level of competitive sport. Two patients returned to sport but at a lower level voluntarily. Arthroscopic capsular plication appears to be a safe and reliable technique in stabilizing shoulders in patients with ligamentous laxity. This form of repair should be offered to this group of patients if treatment with biofeedback physiotherapy fails.
The AP radiograph was evaluated independently by three observers who were blinded to the identity of the patients and their operative diagnosis. The presence of ‘sunset’ sign was recorded. There was 90% inter-observer agreement. In the remaining 10%, a consensus review was performed as to the presence of sign for evaluation purpose. The findings were then correlated with the operative findings to confirm whether they were four-part fractures or not. With 95% confidence interval we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for our diagnostic sign.
All patients underwent examination under anaesthesia, arthroscopic repair of labral tears using the metallic knotless suture anchors, thermal capsulorraphy and closure of the rotator interval. Subacromial decompression was performed when indicated. Rehabilitation consisted of sling immobilisation for four weeks followed by gradual strengthening program over three months with the physiotherapist. Contact sports were allowed at 1 year.