Introduction

Computer hexapod assisted orthopaedic surgery (CHAOS) has previously been shown to provide a predictable and safe method for correcting multiplanar femoral deformity. We report the outcomes of tibial deformity correction using CHAOS, as well as a new cohort of femoral CHAOS procedures.

Abstract

Aims

There has been an evolution recently in the management of unstable fractures of the ankle with a trend towards direct fixation of a posterior malleolar fragment. Within these fractures, Haraguchi type 2 fractures extend medially and often cannot be fixed using a standard posterolateral approach. Our aim was to describe the posteromedial approach to address these fractures and to assess its efficacy and safety.

Aims

Computer hexapod assisted orthopaedic surgery (CHAOS), is a method to achieve the intra-operative correction of long bone deformities using a hexapod external fixator before definitive internal fixation with minimally invasive stabilisation techniques.

The aims of this study were to determine the reliability of this method in a consecutive case series of patients undergoing femoral deformity correction, with a minimum six-month follow-up, to assess the complications and to define the ideal group of patients for whom this treatment is appropriate.

The implementation of knee arthrodesis has become synonymous with limb salvage in the presence of chronic sepsis and bone loss around the knee. This can be seen in failed trauma surgery or knee arthroplasty as an alternative to trans-femoral amputation. There is no prior literature assessing which factors affect knee arthrodesis using external fixation devices.

Sixteen consecutive patients (four women and twelve men) made up of eleven infected knee implants, three internal fixations of the tibial following fractured tibial plateau as well as 2 infected native joints were identified. The mean age at initial surgery was 56 years (range 25 to 82 years). All procedures were performed under the direct supervision of the limb reconstruction teams using a standard protocol with either a Taylor spatial frame or Ilizarov frame. The patient records, microbiology results and radiographs of all patients who underwent knee arthrodesis at this institution between 1999 and 2010 were reviewed.

Of the 16 patients in this study knee fusion occurred in eleven patients (69%). The five patients where arthrodesis failed all had significant bone loss on the pre-operative radiographs and confirmed at surgery. We found a relationship between a significant infection of the knee with MRSA and failure to fuse. Three of the five patients had MRSA isolated from inside the knee at some stage during their treatment.

The five patients where fusion failed were on average older (mean age 63 years against 51 years) and had more extensive bone loss. Those who failed to fuse had more co-morbidities. We would conclude that where there is little or no bone loss, arthrodesis of the knee can be reliably achieved with the use of circular frame fixation. A greater number of negative factors also prolongs the amount of time spent in the external fixator. The presence of significant bone loss, infection, increased age and multiple co-morbidities requires careful evaluation and consideration of trans-femoral amputation as an alternative.

Introduction

Fixation of posterior malleolar fragments associated with ankle fractures aims to stabilise the syndesmosis and prevent posterior subluxation. Haraguchi described 3 types of posterior malleolar fractures, with type 2 being a medial extension injury, these fractures often involve medial and posterior fragments. We describe the techniques and outcomes for a double window posteromedial approach allowing optimal reduction and stabilisation.

Percutaneous grafting of non-union using bone marrow concentrates has shown promising results, we present our experience and outcomes following the use of microdrilling and marrowstim in long bone non-unions.

We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing a marrowstim procedure for non-union in 2011–12. Casenotes and radiographs were reviewed for all. Details of injury, previous surgery and non-union interventions together with additional procedures performed after marrowstim were recorded for all patients. The time to clinical and radiological union were noted.

We identified 32 patients, in sixteen the tibia was involved in 15 the femur and in one the humerus. Ten of the 32 had undergone intervention for non-union prior to marrowstim including 4 exchange nailings, 2 nail dynamisations, 3 caption graftings, 2 compression in circular frame and 1 revision of internal fixation. Three underwent adjunctive procedures at the time of marroswstim. In 18 further procedures were required following marrowstim. In 4 this involved frame adjustment, 5 underwent exchange nailing, 4 revision internal fixation, 2 additional marrowstim, 2 autologous bone grafting and 3 a course of exogen treatment.

In total 27 achieved radiological and clinical union at a mean of 9.6 months, of these ten achieved union without requiring additional intervention following marrowstim, at a mean of 5.4 months. There were no complications relating to marrowstim harvest or application.

Marrowstim appears to be a safe and relatively cheap addition to the armamentarium for treatment of non-union. However many patients require further procedures in addition to marrowstim to achieve union. Furthermore given the range of procedures this cohort of patients have undergone before and after marrowstim intervention it is difficult to draw conclusions regarding it efficacy.

Total hip replacement (THR) is NICE recommended for a group of patients with neck of femur fracture (NOF) and guidance published in 2011. In our institution a Hip Fracture Program was established at this time to improve patient care.

An audit of the Hip Fracture Program, appropriateness of THR and management following THR was undertaken and compared to NICE standards, set at 100%, and National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) results

The case-notes for 53 patients (38 female, 15 male) undergoing THR for NOF between 2011 and 2013 were reviewed: median age 70 yrs (34–87), follow-up 28 months (3–57).

All patients were initiated on a Hip Fracture Program. 92% were eligible for THR according to NICE guidance. Pre-operative pain management (67%), hourly assessment of pain in ED (4%), surgery with 48 hours (32%), pre-operative orthogeriatric review (58%) and intra-operative nerve block (38%) are areas for development, but most results are comparable to NHFD. Post-operative care is satisfactory with daily mobilisation (87%) and post-operative pain management (100%). No post-operative dislocation or infection was recorded. There was one case of post-operative DVT.

This study highlights areas for improvement in hip fracture management and emphasises the benefits in implementing a Hip Fracture Program in this vulnerable patient population.

We would like to present this case series of 10 adolescent patients with displaced, closed diaphyseal tibial fractures managed using the Taylor Spatial Frame.

Management options for these injuries include non-operative treatment, antegrade nailing, flexible nailing systems, plating and external circular fixation. External circular fixation allows anatomical reduction avoiding potential complications such as growth arrest associated with antegrade nailing and retained metal work with plating. Flexible nailing system and cast immobilisation are unreliable for precise anatomical reduction. With limited evidence as to the extent of post-traumatic deformity that is acceptable, combined with the limited remodeling potential that this patient group possess, the precision of percutaneous fixation with the Taylor Spatial Frame system has clear advantages.

This is a retrospective analysis of 10 adolescent patients with a mean age of 14.5 years (range 13 to 16 years). Data collected includes fracture configuration, deformity both pre and post operatively compared to post frame removal, length of time in frame and complications. The data was gathered using the patient case notes and the Picture Archiving and Communications System. The mean time in frame was 15.5 weeks (range 11 to 22 weeks). One non-union in a cigarette smoker was successfully managed with a second Taylor Spatial Frame episode.

Our conclusion was that with careful patient selection the Taylor Spatial Frame allows successful treatment of closed tibial fractures in adolescents, avoiding complications such as growth arrest and post-traumatic deformity as well as avoiding retained metalwork.

Introduction

Post-traumatic arthritis is the commonest cause of arthritis of the ankle. Development of arthritis is dependent on the restoration of pre-injury anatomy. To assess the effect of grade of lead surgeon on the accuracy of surgical reduction, we performed a retrospective radiographic analysis of all ankle fractures undergoing open reduction and internal fixation, in a single institution.

The aim of this study was to document our experience of acute forearm compartment syndrome, and to determine the risk factors for requiring split skin grafting (SSG) and developing complications post fasciotomy. We identified from our trauma database all patients who underwent fasciotomy for an acute forearm compartment syndrome over a 22-year period. Diagnosis was made using clinical signs and/or compartment pressure monitoring. Demographic data, aetiology, management, wound closure, complications and subsequent surgeries were recorded. Outcome measures were the use of SSG and the development of complications following forearm fasciotomy.

90 patients were identified with a mean age of 33 yrs (range, 13–81 yrs) and a significant male predominance (n=82, p<0.001). A fracture of one or both of the forearm bones was seen in 62 (69%) patients, with soft tissue injuries causative in 28 (31%). The median time to fasciotomy was 12hrs (2–72). Delayed wound closure was achieved in 38 (42%) patients, with 52 (58%) undergoing SSG. Risk factors for requiring a SSG were younger age and a crush injury (both p<0.05). Complications occurred in 29 (32%) patients at mean follow-up of 11 (3–60) months. Risk factors for developing complications were a delay in fasciotomy of >6 hrs (p=0.018), with pre-operative motor symptoms approaching significance (p=0.068).

Forearm compartment syndrome requiring fasciotomy predominantly affects males and can occur following either a fracture or soft tissue injury. Age is an important predictor of undergoing SSG for wound closure. Complications occur in a third of patients and are associated with an increasing delay in the time to fasciotomy.

Optimal utilisation of operating theatres has a significant impact on the ability of an institution to deliver productive, value for money surgical services. With the recent introduction of the national ‘Productive Theatres’ programme and in the current economic climate it is receiving increasing attention. In addition, it improves patient satisfaction and outcomes, reduces adverse events and has positive influences on staff morale. The aim of this study was to highlight factors influencing trauma theatre utilisation in general, whilst also addressing any problems identified with a view to improving trauma services locally. We conducted a prospective analysis of activity in the trauma theatre at our institution over 1 month. Direct observation was performed by a single independent observer. In the absence of any published guidelines, all theatre lists were assessed against pre-determined standards for each component of the theatre pathway. Overall end utilisation (combined time utilised for anaesthesia and surgery) was found to be low at 65%. A number of factors were found to contribute to inefficiencies including delay in sending for patients (mean 42mins, range 0-105), prolonged patient transit times to theatre (mean 22% of all sessions), late starts to lists (mean 43 mins, range 15-105 mins) waiting for x-ray availability (mean 21mins, range 10-45) and knock on delay from previous lists. Surgeons and anaesthetists were found to be, overall, arriving on time or early for all lists. Strategies for maximising trauma theatre productivity are essential. This study has identified common issues, of potential benefit to numerous institutions when planning trauma services.

A series of 49 pilon fractures in a tertiary referral centre treated definitively with open reduction and internal fixation have been assessed examining the complications associated with such injuries. A retrospective analysis of casenotes, radiographs and computerised tomographs over a seven year period from 1999–2006 was performed.

Infection was the most common post operative problem. There were 7 cases of superficial infection. There was a single case of deep infection requiring intravenous antibiotics and removal of metalwork. Other notable complications were those of secondary osteoarthritis (three cases) and malunion (one case).

The key finding of this paper is the 2% incidence of deep infection following the direct operative approach to these fractures. The traditional operative approach to such injuries (initially advocated by Ruedi and All-gower) consisted of extensive soft tissue dissection to gain access to the distal tibia. Our preferred method is to gain access to via the “direct approach” which involves direct access to the fracture site with minimal disturbance of the soft tissue envelope. We therefore believe open reduction and internal fixation of pilon fractures via the direct approach to be an excellent technique in the treatment of such injuries.

Many studies exist that assess intramedullary and extra-medullary fixation of these fractures, but few exist that compare the two. We performed a retrospective cohort study to compare the above implants in the management of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. 100 fractures in 95 patients were studied, with 47 in the recon nail group and 53 in the DCS group, with 33 male and 62 females, average age 68 years (16–98 years). Data was obtained by review of case notes and x-rays of all cases. The following information was obtained :- age, sex, energy/mechanism of injury, fracture classification (AO & Russell-Taylor, single observer), grade of surgeon, duration of surgery, ASA grading, co-morbidity (using Covinsky score), pre-operative mobility, postoperative mobility (using D’Aubigne & Postel score), mortality, intra-operative complications, post-operative complications, revision surgery/implant failure, follow-up and radiological assessment of reduction/implant position(single observer). Statistical analysis of the data was performed using chi-squared, Fisher’s, Mann-Whitney U and unpaired t-tests. Results showed no significant differences in co-morbidity, complications, mortality, duration of surgery, hospital stay, sex, surgical grade or pre-operative mobility. There were significant differences in age, fracture classification, radiological assessment of reduction/implant position, mechanism of injury and post-operative mobility. Overall 28-day mortality was 8%, post-op complications were seen in 54% and 19 cases required further surgery (detailed breakdown to be presented). Certain areas of bias were identified, in that the DCS had a higher number of complex fracture patterns, thus affecting post-op mobility, whereas the recon nail group had a higher proportion of pathological fractues.

Background: Falls are a major concern in the elderly population both from a clinical perspective and that of health resource provision. This study evaluates the incidence of falls in patients awaiting hip or knee replacement and the impact of joint replacement surgery 2 years later.

Method: Patients aged 65-80 years listed for primary hip or knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis (OA) were invited to participate. Patients completed a questionnaire including Western Ontario and McMaster University OA Index (WOMAC) scores 0-100, 100 best, history of falls and fractures. Function was measured using Timed Up and Go (TUG) walk test. All tests were repeated at two years.

Results: One hundred and ninety-nine patients (84 hips, 115 knees) were recruited with a mean age of 72 years (standard deviation 4.0) and predominantly female (57 %). At two years 144 patients were reviewed of whom 128 had undergone arthroplasty. After surgery, 29/128 (23%) reported falling compared to 55 of these 128 (43%) falling at baseline; only 13/128 (11%) had fallen more than once. Fifteen patients sustained minor injuries and one patient reported a fractured wrist. Of the patients who had undergone joint replacement and fell at baseline 36/55 (66%) patients reported no falls at follow-up, whilst there were 11 new fallers. Patients reporting falls had significantly lower WOMAC pain and function scores, and slower TUG scores at both baseline and two-year review.

Conclusion: Patients with severe hip and knee OA awaiting arthroplasty reported a higher incidence of falls compared to the normal population but reported fewer falls after surgery. However, almost one in four patients were still reporting falling at the two-year review. Injury including periprosthetic fractures can have serious clinical and economic consequences. This study highlights the need to evaluate a falls prevention programme in arthroplasty management.

Introduction and aims: Despite advances in local therapy, there is an ongoing risk of local recurrence after treatment for soft tissue sarcoma. Early detection of local recurrence with MRI scanning may improve outcomes for patients. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the usefulness of routine postoperative MRI scans in diagnosing clinically occult local recurrence after surgery for trunk and extremity soft tissue sarcomas.

Material and Methods: We reviewed the clinical and radiology records of all patients who underwent surgery for trunk or extremity soft tissue sarcoma in our service with the potential for 3 years of follow up. We looked at the number of postoperative MRI scans performed, the indications for the scans (routine or clinical suspicion of recurrence) and the scan results.

Results: Between 1998 and 2003, 151 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 59 (17 – 94) years. The diagnosis was liposarcoma in 37%, malignant fibrous histiocytoma in 17%, and leiomyosarcoma in 15%. Reflecting differences in practice between consultants, 79 patients had routine postoperative MRI scans, 8 patients had MRI scans following clinical suspicion of a local recurrence, and 64 patients did not have a postoperative MRI scan. Of 79 patients undergoing a total of 354 routine postoperative scans, 2 had detection of a local recurrence not suspected clinically. This represents a cost of £55,224 per recurrence detected. Of the 8 patients who underwent MRI scanning for a clinical suspicion of local recurrence, 4 had a local recurrence confirmed on scanning.

Conclusions: Most local recurrences are detected clinically. The cost of detecting local recurrence of a trunk or extremity soft tissue sarcoma by MRI scanning is high. The benefit of earlier detection over clinical examination is not known.

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of osteoporosis in patients awaiting hip and knee replacement for osteoarthritis and to review them two years later to determine the changes in bone density following joint replacement.

Patients aged between 65 and 80 years awaiting total hip or knee replacement were invited to participate. Lumbar spine, bilateral femoral and forearm bone mineral density (BMD) measurements were obtained using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. BMD values were standardised using previously published T-scores and Z-scores. To assess clinical status, patients completed a questionnaire including the Western Ontario and McMaster University OA Index (WOMAC). All measurements were repeated at two-years.

Participants included 199 patients (84 hips and 115 knees) with a mean age of 72 years (SD 4.0) and were predominantly female (hips 67%, knees 50%). At baseline 46/199 (23%) patients (39 females) had evidence of osteoporosis (WHO definition) at one or more sites with the highest prevalence at the forearm (14%). At two-years 144 patients attended for review with 128 having undergone hip (56) or knee (72) replacement. At this review 39/144 (27%) patients (33 females) had evidence of osteoporosis at one or more sites with the highest prevalence at the forearm (22%). The greatest bone loss occurred at the forearm with median BMD change of minus 4% for females (25th percentile minus 7.3%, 75th percentile minus 1.9%) and minus 2.9% for males (25th percentile minus 4.6%, 75th percentile minus 1.1%). There was a significant difference in WOMAC Pain scores at follow-up between the osteo-porotic and non-osteoporotic knee patients (67 versus 81, p=0.002) indicating that osteoporotic patients had greater knee pain.

We have identified the forearm as not only the site with the highest prevalence of osteoporosis but also the greatest bone loss at follow-up. Further evaluation of forearm bone density measurements in the preopera-tive assessment and follow-up of patients awaiting joint replacement for hip and knee OA is required. Larger studies are needed to confirm our finding that the presence of osteoporosis is predictive of worse patient-reported outcomes of knee replacement.

Day case surgery is commonplace in the field of orthopaedic surgery, being suitable for a wide range of both trauma & elective procedures. It became apparent within our unit that an unacceptably high number of cases were being cancelled for a variety of reasons. We set out to identify these reasons and thereby develop a simple screening process to reduce the number of cancellations.

Initial audit over a 1 year period showed 25% of the 907 day case patients were being cancelled. We subdivided the reasons for these cancellations at both pre-operative assessment and on the day of surgery into avoidable [e.g. no carer / telephone, uncontrolled BP, high BMI and ischaemic heart disease] and unavoidable [e.g. surgery no longer required, patient unwell, list cancelled for emergencies, patient DNA].

The majority of our cancellations fell into the “avoidable” category, predominantly at pre-operative assessment. Accordingly, we devised a simple screening questionnaire to be used by clinicians in out-patients at the time of listing for surgery, based on the RCS guidelines (1985). If any of the questions were answered “Yes”, the patient was not suitable for day case surgery. The patient information letter was also changed, informing patients that non-attendance would result in their removal from the waiting list.

Re-audit of 727 patients over the next 12 months showed a fall in cancellations to only 11%, with the majority of these being for unavoidable reasons.

Cancellations are a source of inconvenience, distress and frustration to both clinician and patient, are a waste of hospital time and resources, and lead to an increase in waiting lists. Our study demonstrates the value of closing the loop in audit, leading to a dramatic reduction in cancellations. Audit is a useful tool to improve patient care, and is not merely a “number-crunching” exercise.

Problem-based learning medical courses are now in the majority in the UK. This type of teaching, based on research by Barrow in the 1960s, seeks to integrate basic sciences and clinical teaching, leading to the acquisition of an integrated knowledge base that is readily recalled and applied to the analysis and solution of problems. We noticed an apparent difference in the core anatomical knowledge in a group of 4th year medical students during their orthopaedic placement, some of whom had been taught a traditional course and some a PBL course. We set out to quantify this difference.

60 simple anatomy questions were asked, with 30 minutes allowed, and no negative marking. 33 students were PBL taught, and 27 by a traditional course, with a roughly equal male: female ratio. The average score in the PBL group was 39.2% (range 11–52%), whereas the traditional group averaged 73.7% (range 63–79%).

A second study was undertaken on two groups of 80 second year medical students, at 2 different UK universities with comparable teaching standards and entry requirements, both being well-established courses. Again, a simple 50-question anatomy paper was used, without negative marking. The traditional course students scored a mean of 37.5 (25–46), and the PBL group scored a mean of 32.3 (18–45). The results were statistically significant (p< 0.0001).

Our results suggest that the difference between the two groups with regard to core anatomical knowledge increases with progression through training. This has significant implications due to PBL courses being in the majority. During the usually short orthopaedic attachment, it will become increasingly difficult for clinicians to teach effectively due to the lack of this knowledge.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of clinically detected deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients with trunk or extremity bone or soft tissue sarcomas.

Patients and methods: The clinical records of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma presenting between 1998 and 2003 were reviewed. Data relating to clinical features, risk factors for thromboembolism and clinical thromboembolic events were retrieved.

Results: 252 patients were identified. 94 had a diagnosis of primary bone sarcoma and 158 a diagnosis of primary soft tissue sarcoma. The mean age was 53 (range 15 to 94); 137 (54%) were male.

37 patients were suspected clinically of having a deep venous thrombosis, 10 of which were confirmed radiologically, giving a rate of 4%. Nine patients had a suspected pulmonary embolism, 2 of which were confirmed radiologically and one of whom died of pulmonary embolism, giving an overall rate of fatal pulmonary embolism of 0.4%. All patients with thromboembolic events had lower extremity tumours and all were surgical patients. However, the majority of thromboembolic events (6 of 10 deep venous thromboses and 2 of 3 pulmonary embolisms) occurred prior to surgery.

Discussion: The risk of a clinically apparent thromboembolic event in patients with bone or soft tissue sarcomas is comparable to that in other orthopaedic patients. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism include lower extremity sarcomas and mechanical obstruction of the venous system. Consideration should be given to excluding deep venous thrombosis before surgery.