Numerous factors have been hypothesized as contributing to mechanically-assisted corrosion at the head-neck junction of total hip prostheses. While variables attributable to the implant and the patient are amenable to investigation, parameters describing assembly of the component parts can be difficult to determine. Nonetheless, increasing evidence suggests that the manner of intraoperative assembly of modular components plays a critical role in the fretting and corrosion of modular implants. This study was undertaken to measure the magnitude and direction of the impaction forces applied by surgeons in assembling modular head-neck junctions under operative conditions where both the access and visibility of the prosthesis may potentially compromise component fixation. A surrogate consisting of the lower limb with overlying soft tissue was developed to simulate THR performed via a 10cm incision using the posterior approach. The surrogate was modified to match the resistance of the body to retraction of the incision, mobilization of the femur and hammering of the implanted femoral component. An instrumented femoral stem (SL PLUS) was surgically implanted into the bone after attachment of 3 miniature accelerometers (Dytran Inc) in an orthogonal array to the proximal surface of the prosthesis. A 32mm cobalt chrome femoral head was mounted on the trunnion (12/14 taper, machined) of the femoral stem. 15 Board-certified and trainee surgeons replicated their surgical technique in exposing the femur and impacting the modular head on the tapered trunnion. Impaction was performed using an instrumented hammer (5000 Lbf Dytran impact hammer) that provided measurements of the magnitude and temporal variation of the impact force. The components of force acting along the axis aof the neck and in the AP and ML directions were continuously samples using the accelerometers.Introduction
Methods
With the growing emphasis on the cost of medical care, there is renewed interest in the productivity and efficiency of surgical procedures. We have developed a method to systematically examine the efficiency of the surgical team during primary total knee replacement (TKR). In this report, we present data derived from a series of procedures performed by different joint surgeons. This data demonstrates a variation between the duration and efficiency of each step in this procedure and its relationship to the experience and coordination of the surgeon working with the scrub team. After consent was achieved, videotaped recordings were prepared of ten primary TKR procedures performed by five highly experienced joint surgeons. For quantitative analysis, each procedure was divided into 7 principal tasks from initial incision to wound closure. In order to quantify efficiency, we recorded the occurrence of events leading to delays in each step of the procedure (Table 1). Starting with a total score of 100 points, deductions were made, based on the number of delaying events and its impact on the efficiency of the procedure. A final score for the surgery was then determined using the individual scores from each principal task. The experience of each member of the surgical team in participating in TKR, and in working with the surgeon, were recorded and correlated with the total efficiency score for the entire procedure.Introduction:
Methods:
Malrotation of the tibial component is a common error in TKR, and has been frequently cited as the cause of clinical symptoms. Correct rotational orientation of the tibial tray is difficult to achieve because the resected surface of the tibia is internally rotated and is not symmetrical in shape. This suggests that anatomically contoured components may lead to improved rotational positioning. This study was undertaken to test the hypotheses:
Use of an anatomically shaped tibial tray can reduce the prevalence of malrotation and cortical over-hang in TKA while increasing coverage of the resected tibial surface, and Component shape has more influence on the results of surgical trainees compared to experienced surgeons. A standard symmetric design of tibial tray was developed from the profiles of 3 widely used contemporary trays. Corresponding asymmetric profiles were generated to match the average shape of the resected surface of the tibia based on a detailed morphometric analysis of anatomic data. Both designs were proportionally scaled to generate a set of 7 different sizes. Computer models of eight tibias were selected from a large anatomic collection. The proximal tibia was resected perpendicular to the canal axis with a posterior slope of 5 degrees at a depth of 5 mm (medial). Eleven experienced joint surgeons and twelve trainees individually determined the ideal size and placement of each tray on each of the 8 resected tibias. The rotational alignment, coverage of the resected bony surface, and extent of overhang of the tray beyond the cortical boundary were measured for each implantation. Differences in the parameters defining the implantations of the surgeons and trainees were evaluated statistically.Introduction:
Materials and Methods:
Proper rotational alignment of the tibial component is a critical factor in the outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and misalignment has been implicated as a major contributing factor to several mechanisms of TKA failure. In this study we examine the relationship between bony and soft tissue tibial landmarks against the knee motion axis (plane that best approximates tibiofemoral motion through range of motion). The kinematic motions of 16 fresh-frozen lower limb specimens were analyzed in simulated lunging and squatting. All the tendons of the quadriceps and hamstrings were independently loaded to simulate a lunging or squatting maneuver. All specimens underwent CT scan and the 3D position of the knee was virtually reconstructed. Ten anatomic axes were identified using both the intact tibia and the resected tibial surface. Two axes were normal vectors to either the medial-lateral plateau center or the posterior tibial surface. Seven axes were defined between the tibial tubercle (the most prominent point, center of the tubercle, or medial third of the tubercle) and soft tissue landmarks of the tibia (the medial insertion of the patellar tendon, the center of the PCL and ACL, and the tibial spines). The last axis was the Knee Motion Axis (KMA), which was defined as the longitudinal axis of the femur from 30 to 90 degrees of flexion.Introduction:
Methods:
Despite all the attention to new technologies and sophisticated implant designs, imperfect surgical technique remains a obstacle to improving the results of total knee replacement (TKR). On the tibial side, common errors which are known to contribute to post-operative instability and reduced function include internal rotation of the tibial tray, inadequate posterior slope, and excessive component varus or valgus. However, the prevalence of each error in surgeries performed by surgeons and trainees is unknown. The following study was undertaken to determine which of these errors occurs most frequently in trainees acquiring the surgical skills to perform TKR. A total of 43 knee replacement procedures were performed by 11 surgical trainees (surgical students, residents and fellows) in a computerized training center. After initial instruction, each trainee performed a series of four TKR procedures in cadavers (n = 2) and bone replicas (n = 2) using a contemporary TKR instrument set and the assistance of an experienced surgical instructor. Prior to each procedure, computer models of each cadaver and/or bone replica tibia were prepared by reconstructing CT scans of each specimen. All training procedures were performed in a navigated operating room using a 12 camera motion analysis system (Motion Analysis Inc.) with a spatial resolution in all three orthogonal directions of ± 0.15 mm. The natural slope, varus/valgus alignment, and axial rotation of the proximal tibial surface were recorded prior to surgery and after placement of the tibial component. For evaluation of all data, acceptable limits for implantation were defined as: posterior slope: 0–10°; varus/valgus inclination of tibial resection: ± 3°; and external rotation: 0–10°.Introduction:
Materials and Methods:
Although the “learning curve” in surgical procedures is well recognized, little data exists documenting the accuracy of surgeons in performing individual steps of orthopedic procedures. In this study we have used a validated computer-based training system to measure variations instrument placement and alignment in TKA, specifically those relating to tibial preparation. Eleven trainees (surgical students, residents and fellows) were recruited to perform a series of 43 knee replacement procedures in a computerized training center. After initial instruction, each trainee performed a series of four TKA procedures in cadavers (n=2) and bone replicas (n=2) using a contemporary TKA instrument set and the assistance of an experienced surgical instructor. The Computerized Bioskills system was utilized to monitor the placement and orientation of the proximal tibial osteotomy and the tibial tray.Introduction
Methods
