Implant alignment in knee arthroplasty has been identified as critical factor for a successful outcome. Human error during the registration process for imageless computer navigation knee arthroplasty directly affects component alignment. This cadaveric study aims to define the error in the registration of the landmarks and the resulting error in component alignment.

Five fresh frozen cadaveric limbs including the hemipelvis were used for the study. Five surgeons performed the registration process via a medial parapatellar approach five times. In order to identify the gold standard point, the soft tissues were stripped and the registration was repeated by the senior author. Errors are presented as mm or degrees from the gold standard registration.

The error range in the registration of the femoral centre in the coronal plane was 6.5mm laterally to 5.0mm medially (mean: −0.1, SD: 2.7). This resulted in a mechanical axis error of 5.2 degrees valgus to 2.9 degrees varus (mean: 0.1, SD: 1.1). In the sagittal plane this error was between −1.8 degrees (extension) and 2.7 degrees (flexion). The error in the calculation of the tibial mechanical axis ranged from −1.0 (valgus) to 2.3 (varus) degrees in the coronal plane and −3.2 degrees of extension to 1.3 degrees of flexion. Finally the error in calculating the transepicondylar axis was −11.2 to 6.3 degrees of internal rotation (mean: −3.2, SD: 3.9).

The error in the registration process of the anatomical landmarks can result in significant malalignment of the components. The error range for the mechanical axis of the femur alone can exceed the 3 degree margin that has been previously been associated with implant longevity. The technique during the registration process is of paramount importance for image free computer navigation. Future research should be directed towards simplifying this process and minimizing the effect of human error.

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of clinical assessment compared to imageless computer navigation in determining the amount of fixed flexion during knee arthroplasty.

In fourteen cadaver knees, a medial para-patella approach was performed and the navigation anatomy registration process performed. The knees were held in various degrees of flexion with two crossed pins. The degree of flexion was first recorded on the computer and then on lateral radiographs. The cadaver knees were draped as for a knee arthroplasty and nine examiners (three arthroplasty surgeons, three fellows, and three residents) were asked to clinically assess the amount of fixed flexion. Three examiners repeated the process one week later.

The mean error from the radiograph in the navigation group was 2.18 degrees (95%CI 2.18+/−0.917) compared to 5.57 degrees (CI 5.57+/− 0.715) in the observer group. The navigation was more consistent with a range of error of only 5.5 degrees (standard deviation 1.59). The observers had a range of error of 18.5 degrees (S.D. = 4.06). When analysing the observers’ error with respect to flexion (+) and extension (−), they tended to under-estimate the amount of knee flexion (median error=−4) whereas the navigation was more evenly distributed (median error=0). The highest correlation was found between navigation and the radiograph r=0.96. The highest observer correlation with the radiograph was a consultant surgeon (r=0.91) and the worst was from a resident (r=0.74). The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.88 for the three surgeons who repeated the measurements; their mean error was 3.5 degrees with a range of fifteen degrees.

The use of computer navigation appears to be more accurate in assessing the degree of knee flexion, with a reduced range of error when compared to clinical assessment. It is therefore less likely to leave the patient with residual fixed flexion after knee arthroplasty.

Alignment of the femoral component during hip resurfacing has been implicated in the early failure of this device. Techniques to facilitate a more accurate placement of the femoral component may help prevent these early failures. We aim to establish whether the use of imageless computer navigation can improve the accuracy in alignment of the femoral component during hip resurfacing.

6 pairs of cadaveric limbs were randomized to the use of computer navigation or standard instrumentation. All hips had radiographs taken prior to the procedure to facilitate accurate templating. All femoral components were planned to be implanted with a stem shaft angle of 135 degrees. The initial guide wire was placed using either the standard jig with a pin placed in the lateral cortex or with the use of an imageless computer navigation system. The femoral head was then prepared in the same fashion for both groups. Following the procedure radiographs were taken to assess the alignment of the femoral component.

The mean stem shaft angle in the computer navigation group was 133.3 degrees compared to 127.7 degrees in the standard instrumentation group (p=0.03). The standard instrumentation group had a range of error of 15 degrees with a standard deviation of 4.2 degrees. The computer navigated group had a range of error of only 8 degrees with a standard deviation of 2.9 degrees.

Our results demonstrated that the use of standard alignment instrumentation consistently placed the femoral component in a more varus position when compared to the computer navigation group. The computer navigation was also more consistent in its placement of the femoral component when compared to standard instrumentation. We suggest that imageless computer navigation appears to improve the accuracy of alignment of the femoral component during hip resurfacing.

A cadaver study using six pairs of lower limbs was conducted to investigate the accuracy of computer navigation and standard instrumentation for the placement of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing femoral component. The aim was to place all the femoral components with a stem-shaft angle of 135°.

The mean stem-shaft angle obtained in the standard instrumentation group was 127.7° (120° to 132°), compared with 133.3° (131° to 139°) in the computer navigation group (p = 0.03). The scatter obtained with computer-assisted navigation was approximately half that found using the conventional jig.

Computer navigation was more accurate and more consistent in its placement of the femoral component than standard instrumentation. We suggest that image-free computer-assisted navigation may have an application in aligning the femoral component during hip resurfacing.