Sagittal pelvic tilt (SPT) can change with spinal pathologies and fusion. Change in the SPT can result in impingement and hip instability. Our aim was to determine the magnitude of the SPT change for hip instability to test the hypothesis that the magnitude of SPT change for hip instability is less than 10° and it is not similar for different hip motions. Hip implant motions were simulated in standing, sitting, sit-to-stand, bending forward, squatting and pivoting in Matlab software. When prosthetic head and liner are parallel, femoral head dome (FHD) faces the center of the liner. FHD moves toward the edge of the liner with hip motions. The maximum distance between the FHD and the center in each motion was calculated and analyzed. To make the results more reliable and to consider the possibility of bony impingement, when the FHD approached 90% of the distance between the liner-center and liner-edge, we considered the hip “in danger for dislocation”. The implant orientations and SPT were modified by 1-degree increments and we used linear regression with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) to determine the magnitude of SPT change that could cause instability.Introduction
Methods
Most of studies on Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) are focused on acetabular cup orientation. Even though the literature suggests that femoral anteversion and combined anteversion have a clinical impact on THA stability, there are not many reports on these parameters. Combined anteversion can be considered morphologically as the addition of anatomical acetabular and femoral anteversions (Anatomical Combined Anatomical Anteversion ACA). It is also possible to evaluate the Combined Functional Anteversion (CFA) generated by the relative functional position of femoral and acetabular implants while standing. This preliminary study is focused on the comparison of the anatomical and functional data in asymptomatic THA patients. 50 asymptomatic unilateral THA patients (21 short stems and 29 standard stems) have been enrolled. All patients underwent an EOS low dose evaluation in standing position. SterEOS software was used for the 3D measurements of cup and femur orientation. Cup anatomical anteversion (CAA) was computed as the cup anteversion in axial plane perpendicular to the Anterior Pelvic Plane. Femoral anatomical anteversion (FAA) was computed as the angle between the femoral neck axis and the posterior femoral condyles in a plane perpendicular to femoral mechanical axis. Functional anteversions for the cup (CFA) and femur (FFA) were measured in the horizontal axial patient plane in standing position. Both anatomical and functional cumulative anteversions were calculated as a sum. All 3D measures were evaluated and compared for the repeatability and reproducibility Statistical analysis used Mann-Whitney U-test considering the non-normal distribution of data and the short number of patients (<30 for each group).Introduction
Material and methods
Minimally invasive anterolateral approach (ALA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has gained popularity in recent years as better postoperative functional recovery and lower risk of postoperative dislocation are claimed. However, difficulties for femur exposure and intraoperative complications during femoral canal preparation and component placement have been reported. This study analyzes the anatomical factors likely to be related with intraoperative complications and the difficulties of access noted by the surgeons through a modified minimally invasive ALA. The aim is to define the profile for patient at risk of intraoperative complications during minimally invasive ALA. We retrospectively included 310 consecutive patients (100 males, 210 females) who had primary unilateral THA using the same technique in all cases. The approach was performed between the tensor fascia lata and the gluteus medius and minimus, without incising or detaching muscles and tendons. Posterior translation was combined to external rotation for proximal femur exposure (Fig. 1). All patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically. For the radiological evaluation, all patients underwent pre- and postoperative standing and sitting full-body EOS acquisitions. Pelvic [Sacral slope, Pelvic incidence (PI), Anterior pelvic plane angle] and femoral parameters were measured preoperatively. We assessed all intraoperative and postoperative complications for femoral preparation and implantation. Intraoperative complications included the femoral fractures and difficulties for femoral exposure (limitations for exposure and lateralization of the proximal femur). The patients were divided into two groups: patients with or without intraoperative complications.Purpose
Methods
Limb-length discrepancy (LLD) is a common postoperative complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study focuses on the correlation between patients’ perception of LLD after THA and the anatomical and functional leg length, pelvic and knee alignments and foot height. Previous publications have explored this topic in patients without significant spinal pathology or previous spine or lower extremity surgery. The objective of this work is to verify if the results are the same in case of stiff or fused spine. 170 patients with stiff spine (less than 10° L1-S1 lordosis variation between standing and sitting) were evaluated minimum 1 year after unilateral primary THA implantation using EOS® images in standing position (46/170 had previous lumbar fusion). We excluded cases with previous lower limbs surgery or frontal and sagittal spinal imbalance. 3D measures were performed to evaluate femoral and tibial length, femoral offset, pelvic obliquity, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), knee flexion/hyperextension angle, tibial and femoral rotation. Axial pelvic rotation was measured as the angle between the line through the centers of the hips and the EOS x-ray beam source. The distance between middle of the tibial plafond and the ground was used to investigate the height of the foot. For data with normal distribution, paired Student's t-test and independent sample t-test were used for analysis. Univariate logistic regression was used to determine the correlation between the perception of limb length discrepancy and different variables. Multiple logistic regression was used to investigate the correlation between the patient perception of LLD and variables found significant in the univariate analysis. Significance level was set at 0.05.Introduction
Methods
Post op cup anatomical and functional orientation is a key point in THP patients regarding instability and wear. Recently literature has been focused on the consequences of the transition from standing to sitting regarding anteversion, frontal and sagittal inclination. Pelvic incidence (PI) is now considered as a key parameter for the analysis of sagittal balance and sacral slope (SS) orientation. It's influence on THP biomechanics has been suggested. Interestingly, the potential impact of this morphological angle on cup implantation during surgery and the side effects on post op functional orientation have not been studied. Our study explores this topic from a series of standing and sitting post-op EOS images 310 patients (mean age 63,8, mean BMI 30,2) have been included prospectively in our current post-operative EOS protocol. All patients were operated with the same implants and technique using anterior approach in lateral decubitus. According to previous literature, 3 groups were defined: low PI less than 45° (57 cases), high PI if more than 60° (63 cases), and standard PI in 190 other cases.Introduction
Material and methods
Few studies are published about total hip arthroplasties (THA) in Parkinson's disease as it is often considered as a contraindication for hip replacement. THA for fracture is reported as a high complication rate surgery. Regarding bone quality these cases are assimilated to elderly patients and cemented implants are generally preferred. However, due to the improved length and quality of life, we face more potential indications for joint replacement. The aim of this study is to report our experience of cementless dual mobility implants for primary THAs for osteoarthrosis and THA revisions focusing on the risks and benefits of surgery. 65 THA were performed in 59 patients (34 men, 25 women, mean age 73 years, 55–79). Mean latest follow-up was 8,3 years (4–14). Indications were 42 primary THA (osteoarthrosis) and 21 revisions (11 recurrent dislocation, 6 acetabular PE wear, 4 femoral loosening). Surgical approach was always antero-lateral. All patients were implanted with the same dual mobility cementless cup. The same cementless corail-type stem was used for primary THA cases. All the cemenless implants were hydroxyapatite coated. The disability caused by the disease was classified according to Hoehn and Yahr. (19 stage 1, 21 stage 2,16 stage 3)Introduction
Material and methods
Optimal implant position is critical to hip stability after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Recent literature points out the importance of the evaluation of pelvic position to optimize cup implantation. The concept of Functional Combined Anteversion (FCA), the sum of acetabular/cup anteversion and femoral/stem neck anteversion in the horizontal plane, can be used to plan and control the setting of a THA in standing position. The main purpose of this preliminary study is to evaluate the difference between the combined anteversion before and after THA in weight-bearing standing position using EOS 3D reconstructions. A simultaneous analysis of the preoperative lumbo pelvic parameters has been performed to investigate their potential influence on the post-operative reciprocal femoro-acetabular adaptation. 66 patients were enrolled (unilateral primary THAs). The same mini-invasive anterolateral approach was performed in a lateral decubitus for all cases. None of the patients had any postoperative complications. For each case, EOS full-body radiographs were performed in a standing position before and after unilateral THA. A software prototype was used to assess pelvic parameters (sacral slope, pelvic version, pelvic incidence), acetabular / cup anteversion, femoral /stem neck anteversion and combined anteversion in the patient horizontal functional plane (the frontal reference was defined as the vertical plane passing through centers of the acetabula or cups). Sub-analysis was made, grouping the sample by pelvic incidence (<55°, 55°–65°, >65°) and by pre-operative sacral slope in standing position (<35°, 35°–45°, >45°). Paired t-test was used to compare differences between preoperative and postoperative parameters within each subgroup. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.Introduction
Material and Methods
Understanding hip-spine relationships and accurate evaluation of the pelvis position are key- points for the optimization of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Hip surgeons know the importance of pelvic parameters and the adaptation mechanisms of pelvic and sub-pelvic areas. Literature about posture after THA remains controversial and adaptations are difficult to predict. One explanation can be the segmental analysis focused on pelvic parameters and local planning. In a significant number of patients a global analysis may be important as a cascade of compensatory mechanisms is implemented, the hip being only one of the links of this chain reaction. 3 parameters can be measured on full body images: SVA (sagittal vertical axis) : horizontal distance between the vertical line through the center of C7 and the postero-superior edge of S1. T1 pelvic angle (TPA) : line from femoral heads to T1center and line from the femoral heads to S1center. TPA combines informations from both the sagittal vertical axis and pelvic tilt. Global Sagittal Angle (GSA) : line from the midpoint of distal femoral condyles to C7 center and line from the midpoint between distal femoral condyles to the postero-superior S1corner. The objective of this preliminary study is to report the post-operative evolution of posture after THA. 49 patients (28 women, 21 men, mean age 61 years) were enrolled for full-body standing EOS images before and after THA. The sterEOS software was used to measure pelvic parameters (sacral slope SS, pelvic incidence PI) and global postural parameters (TPA, GSA, SVA). Sub-analysis was made, grouping the sample by TPA (<14°, 14°–22°, >22°), by PI (<55°, 55°–65°, >65°) and by SS (<35°, 35°–45°, >45°). Paired t-test was used to compare differences between preoperative and postoperative parameters within each subgroup. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.Introduction
Material and Method
The current, most popular recommendation for cup orientation, namely the Lewinnek box, dates back to the 70's, that is to say at the stone age of hip arthroplasty. Although Lewinnek's recommendations have been associated with a reduction of dislocation, some complications, either impingement or edge loading related, have not been eliminated. Early dislocations are becoming very rare and most of them probably occur in “outlier” patients with atypical pelvic/hip kinematics. Because singular problems usually need singular treatments, those patients need a more specific personalised planning of the treatment rather than a basic systematic application of Lewinnek recommendations. We aim in this review to define the potential impacts that the spine-hip relations (SHRs) have on hip arthroplasty. We highlight how recent improvements in hip implants technology and knowledge about SHRs can substantially modify the planning of a THR, and make the «Lewinnek recommendations» not relevant anymore. We propose a new classification of the SHRs with specific treatment recommendations for hip arthroplasty whose goal is to help at establishing a personalized planning of a THR. This new classification (figures 1 and 2) gives a rationale to optimize the short and long-term patient's outcomes by improving stability and reducing edge loading. We believe this new concept could be beneficial for clinical and research purposes.
The ESP prosthesis is a one-piece deformable but cohesive interbody spacer. it provides 6 full degrees of freedom about the 3 axes including shock absorption (fig1). The prosthesis geometry allows limited rotation and translation with resistance to motion (elastic return property) aimed at avoiding overload of the posterior facets. The rotation center can vary freely during motion in this “silentblock” implant. It thus differs substantially from current prostheses. Surgeries were performed by 2 senior surgeons in 54 women and 34 men (1level in 72 cases, 2 levels in 3 cases, hybrid construct in 13 cases). Average age was 42 (SD: 7). Average BMI was 24.2kg/m2 (SD: 3,4). Clinical data and X-rays were collected at the preoperative time and at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months post-op. The analysis was performed by a single observer independent from the selection of patients and from the surgical procedure. The radiological analysis at 60 months follow-up could be realized in only 76 cases because the quality of the dynamic Xrays was not sufficient in 12 patients. We measured the ROM and the location of mean center of rotation (MCR) of the implanted and adjacent levels using the Spineview® software. The MCR is considered to reflect the quality of movement of a segment; it is localized thanks its co-ordinates. X is expressed as a percentage of the length of the vertebral end plate, and Y as a percentage of the height of the posterior wall. The usual location of the MCR is in a circle, whose center is placed between 30 and 50% of the superior vertebral endplate of the vertebra below, and whose diameter is 70% of the vertebral endplate size.Introduction
Material and methods
Optimal implant position is the important factor in the hip stability after THA. Both the acetabular and femoral implants are placed in anteversion. While most hip dislocations occur either in standing position or when the hip is flexed, preoperative hip anatomy and postoperative implants position are commonly measured in supine position with CT scan. The isolated and combined anteversions of femoral and acetabular components have been reported in the literature. The conclusions are questionable as the reference planes are not consistent: femoral anteversion is measured according to the distal femoral condyles plane (DFCP) and acetabulum orientation in the anterior pelvic plane (APP)). The EOS imaging system allows combined measurements for standing position in the “anatomical” reference plane or anterior pelvic plane (APP) or in the patient “functional” plane (PFP) defined as the horizontal plane passing through both femoral heads. The femoral anteversion can also be measured conventionally according to the DFCP. The objective of the study was to determine the preoperative and postoperative acetabular, femoral and combined hip anteversions, sacral slope, pelvic incidence and pelvic tilt in patients who undergo primary THA. The preoperative and postoperative 3D EOS images were assessed in 62 patients (66 hips). None of these patients had spine or lower extremity surgery other than THA surgery in between the 2 EOS assessments. None had dislocation within the follow up time period.Introduction
Material and Methods
Limb length discrepancy after THA can result in medicolegal litigation. It can create discomfort for the patient and potentially cause back pain or affect the longevity of the implant. Some patients tolerate the length inequality better compared to others despite difference in anatomical femoral length after surgery. We analyzed the 3D EOS images of 75 consecutive patients who underwent primary unilateral THA (27 men, 48 women). We measured the 3D length of the femur and tibia (anatomical length), the 3D global anatomical length (the sum of femur and tibia anatomical lengths), the 3D functional length (center of the femoral head to center of the ankle), femoral neck-shaft angle, hip-knee-ankle angle, knee flexum/recurvatum angle, sacral slopes and pelvic incidence. We correlated these parameters with the patient perception of the leg length.Introduction
Methods and materials
EOS® is a low dose imaging system which allows the acquisition of coupled AP and lateral high-definition images while the patient is in standing position. HipEos has been developped to perform pre-surgical planning including hip implants selection and virtual positioning in functional weight-bearing 3D. The software takes advantage of the real size 3D patient anatomical informations obtained from the EOS exam. The aim of this preliminary study on 30 consecutive THP patients was to analyze the data obtained from HipEos planning for acetabular and femoral parameters and to compare them with pre and post-operative measurements on standing EOS images. Full body images were used to detect spino-pelvic abnormalities (scoliosis, pelvic rotation) and lower limbs discrepancies. One surgeon performed all THP using the same type of cementless implants (anterior approach, lateral decubitus). The minimum delay for post-op EOS controls was 10 months. A simulation of HipEos planning was performed retrospectively in a blinded way by the same surgeon after the EOS controls. All measurements were realized by an independent observer. Comparisons were done between pre and post-op status and the “ideal planning” taking in account the parameters for the restitution of joint offset and femur and global limb lengths according to the size of the selected implants. Regarding cup anteversion, the data included the anatomical anteversion (with reference to the anterior pelvic plane APP) and functionnal anteversion (according to the horizontal transverse plane in standing position).Introduction
Material and methods
Rottinger published a description of an anterior muscle sparing approach to the hip. It utilizes the same muscle interval as the classic WatsonJones approach between the gluteus medius laterally and tensor fascia lata medially. However, this technique has the disadvantage of needing asplit table and a sterile bag to mobilize the operative leg as extension, adduction and external rotation are the key points for femoral preparation. This study describes our experience for an equivalent of the Watson Jones approach with a simplified technique for the femoral preparation. Incision starts 1cm distal and 3cm posterior to the ASIS and continues distally for about 8–10 cm along the straightline joining the lateral edge of the patella. It can be extended proximally or distally if necessary. The surgeon is placed posteriorly and the assistant anteriorly. The hip is dislocated with extension and external rotation to osteotomize the femoral neck. During the preparation of the acetabulum the femur is pushed posteriorly with internal rotation. Steinman pins are placed around the acetabulum to improve visualization for reaming and implanting theacetabular components. The femur is then exposed in a simplified way. The operated limb remains on the table. It is adducted above the contralateral limb and rotated outward to allow the femoral metaphysis to protrude. The foot is placed on the edge of the table beside the assistant, the knee is maintained with 45° flexion. The hip capsule is released postero-laterally to improve the femur exposure using Hohman retractors without cutting the short external rotator muscles. Femoral preparation is performed in this position. Once the appropriate implant is selected, the desired head trials are placed. The hip is reduced and the length and stability can be checked with the leg free. In case of isolated cup revision, the femoral head can be conserved. In case of femoral revision, a femorotomy can be easily performed due to the possibility of extended and stable exposure of the femur. Table 1 summarizes the main data of the series.Introduction
Material and Methods
Explanations for “bearing” noise in ceramic-on-ceramic hips (COC) included stripe-wear formation and loss of lubrication leading to higher friction. However clinical and retrieval studies have clearly documented stripe wear in patients that did not have squeaking. Seldom highlighted has been the risk of metal-on-metal or metal-on-ceramic impingement present in total hip arthroplasty (THA) with metal and ceramic cup designs. The limitation in THA positioning studies has been (i) reliance on 2-dimensional radiographic images and (ii) patients lying supine on the examination table, thus not imaged in squeaking positions. We collected eleven squeaking COC cases for an EOS 3D-imaging functional study. Hip positions were documented in each patient's functional ‘squeaking’ posture using standard and 3-D EOS images for sitting, rising from a chair, hip extension in striding, and single-legged stance. EOS imaging documented for the 1st time that postural dysfunctions with potential impingements were demonstrable for each squeaking case. The 1st major insight in this study came from a female patient who complained of squeaking while walking in flat-soled shoes (Figs. 1a, b). She found that when wearing high-heeled shoes her hip stopped squeaking (Figs. 1c, d). Her lateral EOS view in standing position with heeled shoes revealed that the femoral stem had approximately 3o less hyper-extension compared to flat shoes (Figs. 1b, d, arrows #1,3). The three-dimensional ‘sky-view’ EOS reconstruction of pelvis and femurs (Fig. 2) showed that her femur was also more internally rotated when she wore heels. These subtle shifts in position changed her COC hip from one of squeaking to non-squeaking. A squeaking male patient observed similar postural effects while walking up his boat ramp but not going down the ramp. In both cases, the squeaking was a consequence of cup impinging on a metal femoral neck. Thus the primary cause of squeaking appeared to be hip impingement, i.e. repetitive subluxations that patients generally were not aware of. Another case is representative of situations due to atypical and subtle cup/stem mal-adjustments (Fig. 3); frontal pelvic-tilt, thoracolumbar scoliosis, with 1cm of femur lengthening and a significant increase of offset are observed. Also evident was the femoral-neck retroversion in both standing and sitting. Squeaking occurred when modification of the functional neck orientation occured in one-legged stance (Fig. 3c) or when climbing a stair (Fig. 3d). It was apparent in our EOS studies that patient functionality controlled whether squeaking occurred or not. Thus the new data indicated COC squeaking was a three-fold consequence of component positioning, spine and pelvic adaptions, and variations in patient posture. One limitation here is that our conclusions are based on a small sample of patients and may not be applicable to all. A consequence of such repetitive impingement can be cup rim damage and neck-notching, with release of metal debris. It is well documented that retrieved ceramic bearings are frequently stained black. Thus hip squeaking may likely result from (i) impingement and secondarily (ii) due to ingress of metal particles, and then (iii) producing a failure of lubrication.
The combination of spinal fusion and THP is not exceptional. Disorders of the pelvic tilt and stiffness of the lumbosacral junction modify the adaptation options while standing or sitting. Adjusting the cup can be difficult and THP instability is a potential risk. This study reports an experience with EOS® simultaneous measurements on AP and lateral views of spine and hips in THP patients. 29 men and 45 women were included in this prospective study. 21cases had bilateral THP. Patients were separated into two groups: long fusions including the thoraco-lumbar junction (group 1) and shorter fusions below L1 (group 2). We analyzed the impact of the arthrodesis on the position of the pelvis by measuring variations of the sacral slope (SS) and APP angle. Cup position was defined by coronal inclination and functional anteversion in the horizontal plane standing and sitting. We compared the data to a previous series of 150 THP patients with asymptomatic and non fused spine.Introduction
Material and methods
Component placement and the individual's functional posture play key roles in mechanical complications and hip dysfunction after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The challenge is how to measure these. X-rays lack accuracy and CT scans increase radiation dose. A newer imaging modality, EOSTM, acquires low-dose, simultaneous, perpendicular anteroposterior and lateral views while providing a global view of the patient in a functional standing or sitting position, leading to a 3D reconstruction for parameter calculation. The purpose of the present study was to develop an approach using the EOS system to compare patients with good versus poor results after THA and to report our preliminary experiences using this technique. A total of 35 patients were studied: 17 with good results after THA (G-THA), 18 with poor results (P-THA). The patients were operated on or referred for follow-up to a single expert surgeon, between 2001 and 2011, with a minimum follow-up of at least two years. Acetabular cup orientation differed significantly between groups. Acetabular version relative to the coronal plane was lower in P-THA (32°±12°) compared to G-THA (40°±9°) (p=0.02). There was a strong trend towards acetabular cup inclination relative to the APP being higher in P-THA (45°±9°, compared to 39°±7°; p=0.07). Proportions of P-THA vs. G-THA patients with cup orientation values higher or lower than 1 SD from the overall mean differed significantly and substantially between groups. All revision cases had a least four values outside 1 SD, including acetabular cup orientation, sagittal pelvic tilt, sacral slope, femoral offset and neck-shaft angle. This is the first study to our knowledge to provide acetabular, pelvic and femoral parameters for these two groups and the first to provide evidence that a collection of high/low parameters may together contribute to a poor result. The results show the importance of acetabular component placement, in both inclination and version and the importance of looking at individuals, not just groups, to identify potential causes for pain and functional issues. With the EOS system, a large cohort of individuals can be studied in the functional position relatively quickly and at low dose. This could lead to patient-specific guidelines for THA planning and execution.
Recent literature points out the potential interest of standing and sitting X-rays for the evaluation of THA patients. The accuracy of the anterior pelvic plane measures is questionable due to the variations in the quality of lateral standing and sitting X-rays. The EOS® (EOS imaging, Paris, France) is an innovative slot-scanning radiograph system allowing the acquisition of radiograph images while the patient is in weightbearing position with less irradiation than standard imagers. This study reports the “functionnal” positions of a 150 THA cohort, including the lateral orientation of the cups. The following parameters were measured: sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI) and anterior pelvic plane (APP) sagittal inclination (ASI), frontal inclination (AFI) and planar anteversion (ANT). Irradiation doses were calculated in standing and sitting acquisitions. Variations of sagittal orientation of the cup were measured on lateral standing and sitting images. Descriptive and multivariate analysis were performed for the different parameters studied.Background
Methods
