Optimal acetabular component position in Total Hip Arthroplasty is vital for avoiding complications such as dislocation and impingement, Transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) have been shown to be a reliable landmark to guide optimum acetabular cup position. Reports of iliopsoas impingement caused by acetabular components exist. The Psoas fossa (PF) is not a well-regarded landmark for Component positioning. Our aim was to assess the relationship of the TAL and PF in relation to Acetabular Component positioning. A total of 22 cadavers were implanted on 4 occasions with the an uncemented acetabular component. Measurements were taken between the inner edge of TAL and the base of the acetabular component and the distance between the lower end of the PF and the most medial end of TAL. The distance between the edge of the acetabular component and TAL was a mean of 1.6cm (range 1.4–18cm). The distance between the medial end of TAL and the lowest part of PF was a mean of 1.cm (range 1,3–1.8cm) It was evident that the edge of PF was not aligned with TAL. Optimal acetabular component position is vital to the longevity and outcome following THA. TAL provides a landmark to guide acetabular component position. However we feel the PF is a better landmark to allow appropriate positioning of the acetabular component inside edge of the acetabulum inside the bone without exposure of the component rim and thus preventing iliopsoas impingement at the psoas notch and resultant groin pain.Abstract
Optimal acetabular component position in Total Hip Arthroplasty is vital for avoiding complications such as dislocation, impingement, abductor muscle strength and range of motion. Transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) and posterior labrum have been shown to be a reliable landmark to guide optimum acetabular cup position. There have been reports of iliopsoas impingement caused by both cemented and uncemented acetabular components. Acetabular component mal-positioning and oversizing of acetabular component are associated with iliopsoas impingement. The Psoas fossa (PF) is not a well-regarded landmark to help with Acetabular Component positioning. Our aim was to assess the relationship of the TAL and PF in relation to Acetabular Component positioning. A total of 12 cadavers were implanted with the an uncemented acetabular component, their position was initially aligned to TAL. Following optimal seating of the acetabular component the distance of the rim of the shell from the PF was noted. The Acetabular component was then repositioned inside the PF to prevent exposure of the rim of the Acetabular component. This study was performed at Smith & Nephew wet lab in Watford.Abstract
Background
Methods
Late presentation of DDH continues to remain a major problem particularly in the developing countries. Femoro-Acetabular Zones (FAZ) system is created to find a relation between acetabular maturity and severity of dislocation, in one hand, and the success of closed reduction, on the other hand. We hypnosis that the lower the acetabular index and the closer the femoral head to the acetabulum, the more likely the success of treatment. Thus, a retrospective study was performed on late diagnosed DDH hips that underwent closed treatment at a particular hospital in the Middle East. FAZ are drawn on the AP view of the pelvic x-ray and is based on a perpendicular from the acetabular index at the lateral margin of the superior acetabular rim then another perpendicular to Perkin's line is drawn. This gives three zones, graded I-III. The center of femoral metaphysis is identified denoting the position of the femoral head in relation to the zone classification. FAZ system was applied on 65 pelvic radiographs; mean patient age was 24 months (range: 12 to 36 months) with a minimum follow up of 3 years. Overall, 37 of 65 hips (57%) achieved a satisfactory outcome (Severin I&II), while 22 hips (33%) were found to be unsatisfactory (Severin III). 6 hips (10%) needed an open reduction (
To assess the survivorship of a tapered fluted Titanium monoblock stem in conjunction with subtrochanteric shortening for patients with High Dislocation performed at 2 centres. This was a retrospective study of 84 hips in 52 patients between two centres. All patients had a high dislocation. Thirty five patients had bilateral dysplasia. All patients had total hip arthroplasty with a subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy. The acetabular component was placed at the level of the anatomic hip centre. The femoral component was the “Wagner Cone prosthesis” which is a monoblock Titnium Alloy stem, tapered and fluted. The acetabular component varied. All patients had a follow up examination with a Harris Hip Score and a plain radiograph. The radiographs were assessed for osteotomy complications, change in stem position, evidence of loosening, heterotopic ossification & stress shielding if any. Notes were reviewed for complications.Aim
Methods
Osteotomy through the bare area of olecranon minimises the damage to articular cartilage in the trans-olecranon approach to the distal humerus. In this study we have identified a reliable and easily reproducible anatomical land mark to make sure that the osteotomy passes through the bare area. Two methods were used to determine the line for the osteotomy, in the first a line from the lateral epicondyle perpendicular to the olecranon and in the second an intra-articular marker was used to determine the osteotomy. In 5 cadavers the osteotomy with lateral epicondylar line as a marker went 2 mm proximal to the bare area. Of the 5 cadavers dissected with a marker passed to the angle of olecranon the osteotomy went through the bare area of olecranon in three specimens and just proximal in the other two. In conclusion a cheveron osteotomy with the base of the chevron on the lateral epicondylar line will be the ideal site to make sure that the osteotomy passes through the bare area of the olecranon.
Fracture of the neck of the femur after resurfacing arthroplasty usually leads to failure and conversion to a total hip replacement. We describe an intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck sustained after hip resurfacing which was treated by cannulated screws, resulting in union and retention of the resurfacing implant. The result at follow-up three years later was very satisfactory with a Harris hip score of 99.
Thirty four patients underwent 34 single entry percutaneous physiodesis (SEPP) of both distal femur and proximal tibia between July 1996 and June 2004. Twenty six patients had attained maturity and the rest continue to be followed up. There were 10 females and 16 males. The mean ages were12.8yrs (range11–14yrs) and 13.8yrs (range11–15) respectively. All patients underwent at least three assessments of limb length discrepancy(lld) using CT Scannograms. The Mosely’s straight line graph was then used to predict lld and timing of correction. The procedure was performed under image intensifier control using a 6.5mm drill passed through a small incision. The drill was passed in three directions through a single entry . The physis was curetted. The mean lld at SEPP was 3.36cm(range1.5–5.9cm). The prediction of lld at maturity after SEPP was a mean of 1.4cm(range0.2–2.5cm) and final lld was a mean of 1.38cm (range0.3–2.5cm). The accuracy of prediction was found to have a mean of 0.44cm (range0–0.7cm). One patient (6%) complained of knee pain for about 2 weeks that settled. The rest had no complications. We feel that this technique is minimally invasive with a cosmetic scar, has a shorter hospital stay, low complications and is reliable for phuseal ablation. This technique aided by the CT scannogram and a Mosely’s straight line graph provides a reliable and effective method in the management of small amounts of lld.
We assessed the outcome of patients with Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic fractures treated with femoral revision using an uncemented extensively porous-coated implant. A retrospective clinical and radiographic assessment of 22 patients with a mean follow-up of 33.7 months was performed. The mean time from the index procedure to fracture was 10.8 years. There were 17 patients with a satisfactory result. Complications in four patients included subsidence in two, deep sepsis in one, and delayed union in one. Concomitant acetabular revision was required in 19 patients. Uncemented extensively porous-coated femoral stems incorporate distally allowing stable fixation. We found good early survival rates and a low incidence of nonunion using this implant.
The conservative management if isolated humeral shaft fractures is a long, drawn out, painful process for the patient. For the clinician, it involves multiple clinic attendances and repeated radiographic assessment and brace alteration. The primary reason for conservative management is the excellent results, but a very definite secondary consideration is the high incidence of shoulder pathology after I.M. nailing. This is thought to be due to rotator cuff pathology at the time of surgery. We question the validity of this second argument. Ten consecutive humeral shaft fractures attending our unit had an MRI of both shoulders carried out during the initial stages of their injury. Two of the ten had retrograde nailing and the remainder was managed conservatively. While there was no patient with an occult coracoid fracture in association with the shaft fracture. We found eight out of ten to have significant signal changes in the subacromial space on the side of the fracture only. We conclude that there is a significant occult injury to the shoulder at the time of humeral shaft fracture and this may in fact represent a cause for the high incidence of shoulder pain post fracture.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of traction on the compartment pressures during intramedullary nailing of closed tibial shaft fractures. The study design was a randomised prospective trial. The period of the study was Sept ’99 to Dec 2000. 30 consecutive patients with Tscherne C1 fractures were randomised into two groups.16 patients underwent intramedullary nailing of the tibia with traction and 14 patients without traction. Compartment pressures were measured before the application of traction or commencement of the procedure and at the end of the procedure. The method described by Gulli and Templeman was used to measure all the four compartments of the injured limb. The pressures were measured with a Stryker® pressure monitor. The absolute and differential compartment pressures were recorded. All patients were followed up for the duration of at least 8 months and until fracture union. The data collected was analysed using paired student t-test. There was no statistically significant difference (p>
0.05) in the preoperative mean compartment pressures for both groups when all the four compartments were measured individually. The mean postoperative measurements were higher (range 9–10 mmHg) in all four compartments in the traction group. This was statistically significant (p<
0.05). None of the pressures reached the critical level as they were more than 30 mmHg below the diastolic pressure (differential pressure). These results show that traction increases compartment pressures during intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. The group considered did not have compartment syndrome possibly due to less soft tissue injury. With greater soft tissue injury and greater preoperative compartment pressures, compartment pressures can reach a critical level necessitating decompression. We conclude that intramedullary nailing without traction reduces the chances of significant increase in compartment pressures and advocate the procedure be done without traction.
We evaluated 100 patients in two separate groups of 50 patients for Limb Length Discrepancy after Charnley Total Hip Arthroplasty. The study was a retrospective analysis of the group considered. Group 1 included 50 consecutive patients with unilateral disease who underwent total hip arthroplasty between June 98 – June 99 without intraoperative measurement. Group II included 50 patients with unilateral disease who underwent total hip arthroplasty between June 98 – July 99 with pre-operative templating and intraoperative measurements. Evaluation was undertaken with radiographs using the method of Williamson and Reckling. Two independent observers evaluated pre-operative radiographs and postoperative radiographs taken at a mean of 3 months (6 weeks – 6 months). The inter-oberserver variation was found in 9 preoperative radiographs and 15 postoperative radiographs in the 100 patients (p<
0.6). The mean age of the patients in Group I was 71 years and 4 months (52–83 years) with 24 males and 26 females. The mean age of patients in group II was 69 years and 7 months (41–82 years) with 25 males and 25 females. 23 patients (46%) in group I had a discrepancy of which 19 patients (38%) had a mean increase of o.4cm (0.1–0.8cm) and 4 patients (8%) had a mean decrease in length of 0.325cm (0.2–1.1cm). In group II 14 patients (28%) had a discrepancy with 9 patients (18%) had an mean increase of 0.41cm(0.1–1cm) and a mean decrease of 0.3cm(0.1–0.6cm). The discrepancy found in our series of 100 patients in minimal. The discrepancy can be minimised to a further extend with pre operative templating and intraoperative measurements (p<
0.04). Our study supports the adoption of this to prevent limb length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty.