Abstract
Aim: A prospective randomised clinical trial was performed to evaluate two forms of immobilisation in the treatment of colles fractures not requiring manipulation.
Methods: Patients were randomised to either plaster cast (PC) or a removable splint: wrist splint (FWS) according to date of presentation. Patients who had associated injuries to the same upper limb, previous wrist fracture, and open fractures, below 20 years or impaired cognitive function were excluded. The hospital ethical committee approved the study and informed consent was obtained from patients. Patients were reviewed at one week, two weeks, six weeks and twelve weeks following enrolment into the trial. Radiographs were performed on the first four visits. Subjective data was obtained using a patient questionnaire. Levels of pain, comfort in cast, swelling and any modifications to the cast were documented. Was used at six and twelve weeks to assess Clinical assessment was performed by a qualified physiotherapist using the demerit score of Sarmiento which combines range of motion, grip strength and functional assessment.
Results: There were thirty-seven patients in the PC group and thirty-four in the FWS group. They were well matched in terms of age and sex distribution One patient in the PC group required manipulation under anaesthesia due to loss of position at one week. There was no statistical difference between either treatment method in radiological position. Nine patients in the PC group required change of cast due to loosening or discomfort. A further eight patients in the PC group required cast trimming. Visual analogue scores for pain and cast discomfort were lower in the FS group (p< 0.05). Grip strength compared to the opposite side was higher in the FS group (55.9% Vs 47.8% at week six, 71.8% Vs 65% at week twelve). Functional assessment demonstrated a higher score in the FS group at six weeks. However the difference did not reach statistical significance at repeat examination at twelve weeks.
Conclusion: In this study there was no difference in either method in maintaining fracture position. However there was greater patient satisfaction and earlier rehabilitation in those patients treated in a futura wrist splint. Patients treated in plaster cast required a greater use of plaster room resources. We feel that the use of a removable wrist splint in suitable patients with either undisplaced or minimally displaced distal radial fractures is validated by this study.
The abstracts were prepared by Mr Ray Moran. Correspondence should be addressed to him at the Irish Orthopaedic Association, Secretariat, c/o Cappagh Orthopaedic Hospital, Finglas, Dublin
