Periprosthetic femoral fractures are increasingly seen in recent years, adding considerable burden to the National Health Service. These require complex revision or fixation and prolonged post-operative care, with significant morbidity with associated costs. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the size of femoral cement mantle is associated with periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPF).

This retrospective study was carried out on a cohort of 49 patients (Fracture Group - FG) who previously had a revision procedure following a proximal PPF between 2010 and 2021. Inclusion criteria – all primary cemented total hip replacements (THR). Exclusion criteria – complex primary THR, any implant malposition that required early revision surgery or any pre-fracture stem loosening. The antero-posterior (AP) radiographs from this cohort of patients were assessed and compared to an age, sex, time since THR-matched control group of 49 patients without PPF (Control Group - CG). Distal cement mantle area (DCMA) was calculated on an AP radiograph of hip; the position of the femoral stem tip prior to fracture was also recorded: valgus, varus or central. Limitations: AP radiographs only. Statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft® Excel.

Chi-square test demonstrated statistically significant difference in DCMA between FG and CG. DCMA of 700 to 900 mm² appeared to be protective when compared to DCMA of 0 to 300 mm². Also, a valgus position observed in 23% in FG Vs 4 % in CG increased the risk, with a smaller area of DCMA.

This study demonstrates and recommends that a size of 700 – 900 mm² of the DCMA is protective against periprosthetic fractures, which are further influenced by the positioning of the distal stem tip. This could be due to the gradual decrease in the stiffness gradient from proximal to distal around the stem tip than steep changes, thereby decreasing possibility of a stress riser just distal to the cement mantle or restrictor. Further biomechanical research specific to this finding may be helpful to validate the observation, progressing to suggest a safe standardised surgical technique.

Clinical commissioning groups (CCG) have been replaced with ICBs that will bring together NHS and social care for the local population. ICBs are allocating contracts for long waiters for total hip replacements (THR) to hospitals that have achieved pre-covid volumes of THR, THR volumes undertaken by hospitals in 2022 should be at 2019 levels or more.

Purpose of this study was to identify whether NHS hospitals in England are at a disadvantage in procuring ICB contracts for THR.

THR volumes for NHS and independent sector (IND) hospitals from January 2012 to November 2022 were identified via National Joint Registry. Regional and national trend for THR volumes were identified for both NHS and IND hospitals using linear regression analysis.

Trends of THR for NHS hospitals showed either stagnation or reduction in volume from 2014–2019. In 2022, nationally THR volume of NHS was 70% of 2019 (Figure 1). Trend of THR volume for IND hospitals nationally was a strong uptrend from 2012 to 2022 with a break only in 2020 due to COVID pandemic (Figure 2). Since the pandemic IND have overtaken NHS hospitals in volumes of THR undertaken. Similar picture of trends evolves when THR trends were assessed on a region by region basis.

With NHS hospitals not back to pre-pandemic THR volumes, IND hospitals have a distinct advantage in securing more contracts via ICB. This in turn puts NHS hospitals at risk of taking on more complex and medically unwell patients potentially worsening NJR outcomes for NHS hospitals.

The reasons for the lag in NHS hospitals’ THR volumes are multifactorial, not limited to continued bed pressures, increased emergency and unplanned admissions, staff shortages and sickness, pension taxations preventing doctors from undertaking more THR. However, lack of access to contracts from ICB will put NHS hospitals at huge financial and existential risk for elective care.

For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.

Abstract

Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy (ETO) improves surgical exposure and aids femoral stem and bone cement removal in Revision Total Hip Replacement (RTHR) surgery. The aim of this study was to identify healing rates and complications of ETO in RTHR.

Abstract

Increasing incidence of osteoporosis, obesity and an aging population have led to an increase in low energy hip fractures in the elderly. Perceived lower blood loss and lower surgical time, media coverage of minimal invasive surgery and patient expectations unsurprisingly have led to a trend towards intramedullary devices for fixation of extracapsular hip fractures. This is contrary to the Cochrane review of random controlled trials of intramedullary vs extramedullary implants which continues recommends the use of a sliding hip screw (SHS) over other devices. Furthermore, despite published literature of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of SHS citing benefits such as reduced soft tissue trauma, smaller scar, faster recovery, reduced blood loss, reduced analgesia needs; the uptake of these approaches has been poor. We describe a novel technique one which remains minimally invasive, that not only has a simple learning curve but easily reproducible results. All patients who underwent MIS SHS fixation of extracapsular fractures were included in this study. Technique is shown in Figure 1. We collated data on all intertrochanteric hip fractures that were treated by a single surgeon series during period Jan 2014 to July 2015. Data was collected from electronic patient records and radiographs from Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). Surgical time, fluoroscopy time, blood loss, surgical incision length, post-operative transfusion, Tip Apex Distance (TAD) were analyzed. There were 10 patients in this study. All fractures were Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) type A1 or A2. Median surgical time was 36 minutes (25–54). Mean fluoroscopy time was similar to standard incision sliding hip screw fixation. Blood loss estimation with MIS SHS can be undertaken safely and expeditiously for extracapsular hip fractures.

Aims

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty (THA) can present with pain and osteolysis. The Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) has provided criteria for the diagnosis of PJI. The aim of our study was to analyze the utility of F18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) CT scan in the preoperative diagnosis of septic loosening in THA, based on the current MSIS definition of prosthetic joint infection.

Background

Modularity in total hip replacement(THR) enables precise recreation of native hip biomechanics. However, there have been concerns about raised metal ion levels with increased number of interfaces. We present the 3 year results of ML taper with Kinectiv technology(MLKT), a modular neck uncemented stem. This system has modular neck options, but has only one [0] head in various diameters.

Introduction

Fluorodeoxuglucose(FDG) Positron Emission Tomography(PET) scan is used in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection, when the inflammatory markers and aspiration of the joint do not establish a definitive diagnosis. The aim of our study was to analyse the utility of FDG PET scan in decision making in these patients.

GIRFT was published in the United Kingdom with the aim of streamlining primary care pathways, secondary care, creating a network of hospitals and treatment centres and to better regulate introduction of new implants. It also proposed the use of Orthopaedic Devices Evaluation Panel (ODEP) 10A* rated cemented implants in hip arthroplasty.

Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of adopting GIRFT on surgical time, length of stay, changes to the implants used and number of cases per surgical list.

Prior to adopting GIRFT, elective primary total hip replacement (THR) was predominantly uncemented THR. Age, sex, Body Mass Index (BMI), American Society of Anesthetiss (ASA), closure technique and surgical time of 50 consecutive primary uncemented THR were analysed to identify the appropriate statistical methods. Mean and standard deviation for surgical time were identified. Threshold increase in surgical time was set at 20 minutes. Based on expected difference of 20 minutes and standardised difference, minimum sample size was calculated to be 19. Prospective data on 60 consecutive uncemented THR and 30 consecutive cemented primary THR were included in this study. Inclusion criteria – primary THR for arthritis by single surgeon. Exclusion criteria – previous hip surgery, complex primary, abnormal anatomy.

No differences in age, sex, BMI, ASA and length of stay between the two groups. Surgical time was significantly increased by 28 minutes (p<0.001). Implants used changed from 7A*/5A* uncemented THR to 10A* (18/30) and 7A*(12/30) cemented THR. There was a reduction in number of THR done per surgical list due to the increase in surgical time (3 instead of 4).

GIRFT compliance improved from 0% cemented to 100% cemented. 0% 10A* rated implants to 66% 10A* rated implants. Undertaking cemented THR instead of uncemented THR is associated with significantly increased surgical time. Hence, number of THR surgeries performed in a day's list is accordingly reduced. There is potential for financial loss when the savings in the implants used is compared with the reduction in the number of surgeries performed.

The effectiveness of intravenous tranexamic acid (TA) in reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements during total hip replacement (THR) is well recognised. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a fibrin sealant in comparison to intravenous TA and a control group.

We prospectively studied 270 patients with primary hip osteo-arthritis who underwent a straight forward THR between February 2012 and September 2013. The first 70 patients acted as the control group. The next 100 consecutive patients received fibrin sealant spray before closure and the last 100 patients received 1g TA on induction. Demographic data, comorbidities, surgical time, surgeon grade, anaesthetic type, haemoglobin drop post-operative and transfusion requirements were analysed using one-way ANOVA.

The demographic characteristics, surgical time, surgeon grade, anaesthetic type and pre-operative haemoglobin of the 3 groups were comparable. Both fibrin sealant and intravenous TA were effective in reducing blood loss during THR (15%, p = 0.04 & 22.5%, p = 0.01, respectively), when compared to the control group. However, neither treatment was found to be superior to the other in preventing blood loss p = 0.39. Tranexamic acid was superior to fibrin sealant in decreasing allogeneic transfusion requirements (0% vs 10%, p = 0.05). The LOS was significantly shorter in the tranexamic acid group than fibrin sealant group and in the fibrin sealant group compared with control group. There was no significant difference between the groups with regards to proportion of patients with wound leaking problems. No other complications (e.g. VTE) were encountered

Both fibrin sealant and intravenous tranexamic acid were effective in reducing blood loss. However, tranexamic acid use reduced post-operative transfusion requirements.

Aim

The purpose of the study was to assess the outcomes of the surgical management of humeral shaft non-unions.

The optimum design for the femoral component for cementless Total Hip Replacement is not known. We conducted an ethically approved, randomised and prospective trial to compare two radically different designs of fully hydroxyapatite (HA) coated femoral stems. We compared the original JRI Furlong stem with the Wright Anca fit stem which is more anatomical in design. The paper discusses the merits and disadvantages of these two stems. The same acetabular component was used in both samples. The only variable was the stem shape.

All patients placed on the senior author's waiting list for primary THR were asked if they would enter the trial. There were no restrictions for selection to the sample. Patients were then randomised for one of the two stems. All surgery was performed by or under the direct supervision of the senior author. The periprosthetic and perioperative fracture rates for the two stems were found to be significantly different at three years into the study and the trial was stopped. 337 patients had been entered into the trial, 211 females and 126 males.

191 patients had the JRI furlong hip implanted (57%) and 146 are in the Anca sample (43%).

The number of perioperative fractures in the Furlong group was 13 (6.8%)and in the Anca sample 22 (15.1%). This is statistically significant. The possible reasons for this difference are discussed.

Anatomical fit cementless stems require a more careful technique to avoid fracture during implantation and the shorter stemmed Anca hip proved less stable in the presence of a fracture necessitating further surgical intervention. It is still not certain whether the anatomical shape has long term advantages that may outweigh this initial disadvantage and the cohort of patients continues to be followed up.

Background: Tourniquet provides a blood less field for surgery, but it has few complications and contraindications. There are several studies identifying the tourniquet as a factor for increased risk of complications in knee arthroscopy, we reviewed 200 consecutive knee arthroscopies done in our hospital with out tourniquet to analyse the outcome.

Aim: To analyse the out come of 200 knee arthroscopies with out use of tourniquet; with respect to visualisation, time of surgery, bleeding, analgesia and post operative complications.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively analysed 200 consecutive knee arthroscopies with out tourniquet done in our institute. Average age of these patients was 39 (21–81). All patients underwent soft tissue procedures under general anaesthesia, supine, with sole support, no antibiotics and was done by same surgeon as day case. Same arthroscopic kit with pump was used for all patients, using 2 litre saline bag and pump set at 65 mm Hg pressure. First few cases had tourniquet applied but not inflated, but later even this was avoided. Procedures included were diagnostic arthroscopies, arthroscopic debridements, meniscal repairs and partial or complete meniscal resections. Procedures like arthroscopic ACL reconstruction and other bony procedures were excluded. We looked at any visualisation problems, time of surgery, bleeding, analgesia and post operative complications. We also looked weather any of these patients visited the consultant or GP for any wound related problem or pain before the usual review at 2 weeks.

Results: There was no problem with visualisation noted in any of the cases, or any incidence where arthroscopy was unduly prolonged. There was no incidence of bleeding, stiffness or increased need for analgesia in any of these patients. None of the patients had any wound problem or haemathrosis requiring intervention. There was no record of any patients reattending the clinic or their GP for pain or bleeding.

Conclusions: Many orthopaedic units continue to use a tourniquet routinely for soft tissue procedures in knee arthroscopy, probably in the belief that a clear operative view can only be achieved with one. However, the findings in our study indicate that knee arthroscopy for soft tissue procedures may be performed adequately without the use of a tourniquet provided a pump system is used and the pressure maintained above venous pressure. Therefore we recommend that its use for routine soft tissue arthroscopic procedures be discontinued.

Hallux valgus is a common condition and surgical correction has remained a challenge. Scarf osteotomy with Akin procedure is well accepted method. Akin procedure gives spurious correction of the distal alignment of big toe. This study was performed to see alternative way to get best correction without additional phalangeal procedure. Senior author used innovative Y-V medial capsulorraphy with standard Scarf osteotomy. This technique allows reduction of MP joint along with correction of pronation deformity and reduction of sesamoids.

We report the use of a modified Y-V medial capsular repair in association with Scarf osteotomy for Hallux valgux in 45 patients (55 feet) aged 18 to 76 years (mean 43 years) between October 2004 and December 2005. Clinical follow up was both subjective and objective. Patients were asked about rating of their satisfaction and objective assessment was done in form of AOFAS score. Using this technique none of the patients required an additional proximal phalangeal osteotomy with metatarsal osteotomy. At six months follow up American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score improved from 46 to 87. Intermetatarsal (IM) angle and the hallux valgus (HV) angle improved from 16° to 9° and from 31° to 16° respectively (p< 0.05). At final follow up 8 patients were very satisfied, 12 were satisfied while 5 were not satisfied.

Of the 55 procedures 51 did not develop any complications. Two had superficial infections, treated successfully with oral antibiotics only. Two patients had recurrence, one was treated with Akin and second patient declined surgery as she was not bothered with it.

We recommend the use of this modified ‘Y-V’ medial capsular repair to reduce the need for an additional procedure to augment the correction achieved during Scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus. This reduces hallux valgus angle and maintains it.

Background: Tourniquet provides a blood less field for surgery, but it has few complications and contraindications. There are several studies identifying the tourniquet as a factor for increased risk of complications in knee arthroscopy, we reviewed 200 consecutive knee arthroscopies done in our hospital with out tourniquet to analyse the outcome.

Aim: To analyse the out come of 200 knee arthroscopies done with out use of tourniquet; with respect to visualisation, time of surgery, bleeding, analgesia and post operative complications.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively analysed 200 consecutive knee arthroscopies with out tourniquet done in our institute. Average age of these patients was 39 (21–81). All patients underwent soft tissue procedures under general anaesthesia, supine, with sole support, no antibiotics and were done by same surgeon as day case. Same arthroscopic kit (Dyonics) with pump was used for all patients, using 2 litre saline bag and pump set at 65 mm Hg pressure. First few cases had tourniquet applied but not inflated, but later even this was avoided. Procedures included were diagnostic arthroscopies, arthroscopic debridements, meniscal repairs and partial or complete meniscal resections. Procedures like arthroscopic ACL reconstruction and other bony procedures were excluded. We looked at any visualisation problems, time of surgery, bleeding, analgesia and post operative complications. We also looked weather any of these patients visited the consultant or GP for any wound related problem or pain before the usual review at 2 weeks.

Results: There was no problem with visualisation noted in any of the cases, or any incidence where arthroscopy was unduly prolonged. There was no incidence of bleeding, stiffness or increased need for analgesia in any of these patients. None of the patients had any wound problem or haemathrosis requiring intervention. There was no record of any patients reattending the clinic or their GP for pain or bleeding.

Conclusions: Many orthopaedic units continue to use a tourniquet routinely for soft tissue procedures in knee arthroscopy, probably in the belief that a clear operative view can only be achieved with one. However, the findings in our study indicate that knee arthroscopy for soft tissue procedures may be performed adequately without the use of a tourniquet provided a pump system is used and the pressure maintained above venous pressure. Therefore we recommend that its use for routine soft tissue arthroscopic procedures be discontinued.

To assess the outcome and implant removal rate following surgical stabilisation of patella fracture.

Sixty-seven patients who underwent surgical stabilisation of patella fracture between January 1999 and December 2004 were retrospectively reviewed to determine the adequacy of fracture stabilisation, fracture union and implant removal rate.

Forty-three were men and 24 were women with a mean age of 49 years (ranged 14–90 years). Table below demonstrates the injury, fracture patterns and fixation methods. There were 3 open fractures and associated injuries were noted in 22 patients. All fractures united even though the fixation was inadequate in 46 patients. Two superficial infections responded to oral antibiotics. One patient had revision surgery at 6 weeks. Twenty-two patients required implant removal between 2 and 20 months (average 11 months) for implant related symptoms. Of the 22 (32.8%) patients requiring implant removal, 16/40 (40%) were less than 60 years and 6/27 (22.2%) were over 60 years. Mean follow up in asymptomatic patients was 8 months (3 to 18 months) and in patients with implant related problems was 17 months (10 to 36 months). Four patients were lost to follow up.

Surgical stabilisation by current techniques demonstrated satisfactory fracture union. However, one in three required second surgery for implant related symptoms. In the under 60 years group, the implant removal rate increased to 40%. Newer techniques to avoid skin irritation need to be considered.

The authors report the use of a modified ‘Y-V’ medial capsular repair in association with Scarf osteotomy for Hallux valgus in 55 patients (62 feet) aged 18 to 61 years (mean 43 years) between July 2004 and July 2005. All patients were followed up for minimum 6 months by questionnaire, physical examination (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score) and comparison of preoperative and post operative x rays.

Using this technique none of the patients required an additional proximal phalangeal osteotomy (Akin Oste-otomy). At six months follow up American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score improved from 46 to 87. Intermetatarsal (IM) angle and the hallux valgus (HV) angle improved from 16 degree to 9 degree and from 31 degree to 16 degrees respectively (p less than 0.05).

Of the sixty two procedures 59 did not develop any complications. Two had superficial infections which required oral antibiotics only. One partial loss of correction of hallux valgus occurred for which the patient refused a second operation. Seven cases had some residual pronation deformity of the big toe identified by the patients who felt the deformity was ‘about 50%’ compared to before the operation.

Akins osteotomy achieves an apparent correction of hallux valgus without addressing subluxation of meta-tarso-phalangeal joint. Our technique reduces the meta-tarso-phalangeal joint and corrects the hallux valgus angle anatomically.

We recommend the use of this modified ‘Y-V’ medial capsular repair to correct the hallux valgus angle and reduce the need for an additional procedure to augment the correction achieved during Scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus.

To report the experience with the new device, the Long Proximal Femoral Nail (Long PFN) in patients with impending pathological femoral fractures to identify the advantages and complications associated with its usage. This is the first in the series on the use of Long PFN for patients with femoral metastases.

Between April 2000 and September 2001, twenty-five consecutive patients with femoral pathological lesions were prophylactically stabilised using Long PFN. The nailings were performed using a percutaneous closed technique. Lateral femoral Line (LFL) technique was used for location of the entry point and easy insertion for the nail. Only the proximal one-fifth of the femur was reamed to accommodate the 17 mm diameter of the proximal part of the nail.

We had technical problems in three patients. The overall mobility of the patients improved in twenty patients and the mobility remained the same as pre-operative level in five patients. Good to excellent pain relief achieved in eighteen patients. The pain relief was fair in five patients and poor in two patients. We had no mechanical failure of the implant in our series.

Long PFN, a modified reconstruction nail, can be inserted percutaneously and has an easy operation technique. Our early experience with Long PFN in the management of impending femoral fractures has been favourable.

31 patients, between the ages of 59 and 74 years, were referred to one onrthopaedic consultant as trochanteric bursitis. All were females. Of these 7 patients were diagnosed as osteoarthritis of the hip or underwent further investigations for spinal conditions. 24 patients were clinically diagnosed as trochanteric bursitis. All these patients had ultrasound examination of the hips by a radiologist with a special interest in musculoskeletal diseases. Except for one patient the rest had either gluteus medius inflammation or tears with or without involvement of gluteus minimus. All these patients with positive findings had 80mg of depomedrone injection under USG guidance. At 6 weeks follow up 21 had complete relief of symptoms. 4 had recurrence of symptoms at 3 months when they had another dose of depomedrone und USG guidance. At one year 18 were free of symptoms and the 3 with some recurrence of symptoms did not want any intervention.

Discussion: Etiology of greater trochanteric pain syndrome has been a source of considerable debate. Empirical treatment with ‘blind’ steroid injection is the usual course of action. In unresolving trochanteric bursitis excision of trochanteric bursa has been advocated. Gluteus medius and minimus tears have been referred to as rotator cuff tears of the hip (1). Our study shows an association between trochanteric bursitis and ‘rotator cuff tears of hip’. Ultrasound guided steroid injection can give a better success rate of ‘hitting the right spot’. Further investigations are required to identify whether this association could be a cause and effect relationship.

Methods and materials: Between August 2000 and August 2002, 28 patients, average age of 78 years (range 62 to 94 years), with distal femoral fractures (33A1 – 17, 33A2 – 1, 33C1 – 6, 33C2 – 4) were treated with DFN. All the patients had sustained the injury following a simple fall. Periprosthetic fractures were excluded from this study. Two fractures required additional procedures in the form of circleage wires. Nailing was performed through a midline mini arthrotomy. Post operative protocol was to mobilise the patient weight bearing as tolerated.

Results: All fractures healed without the need for secondary procedures. Average period of follow up was 8.5 months. Average hospital stay was 18 days (range 10 to 34). Post operative mobility returned to pre operative state in 15 patients. Three patients died within 3 months due to unrelated medical causes. There was no incidence of extension lag or malunion. Knee range of movement was on average 95°. Patients with pre existing knee arthritis had slight worsening of the pain. Hospital for Special Surgery knee scores were on average 78.3. 23 patients were rated as excellent, 4 good and 1 poor. In one patient the distal screws broke without significant functional impairment.

Conclusion: We recommend the use of DFN in supracondylar femoral fractures in the elderly as it produced satisfactory results with low operative and post operative morbidity. It can be performed with minimal soft tissue damage with good purchase in the osteoporotic bone which allows early mobilisation.