Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) usage is increasing owing to expanded surgical indications, better implant designs, and improved long-term survival. Correct humeral implant positioning has been shown to diminish stem loading in vitro, and radiographic loosening in in the long-term. Replication of the native elbow centre of rotation is thought to restore normal muscle moment arms and has been suggested to improve elbow strength and function. While much of the focus has been on humeral component positioning, little is known about the effect of positioning of the ulnar stem on post-operative range of motion and clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the sagittal alignment and positioning of the humeral and ulnar components on the functional outcomes after TEA.

Between 2003 and 2016, 173 semi-constrained TEAs (Wright-Tornier Latitude/Latitude EV, Memphis, TN, USA) were performed at our institution, and our preliminary analysis includes 46 elbows in 41 patients (39 female, 7 male). Patients were excluded if they had severe elbow deformity precluding reliable measurement, experienced a major complication related to an ipsilateral upper limb procedure, or underwent revision TEA. For each elbow, saggital alignment was compared pre- and post-operatively. A best fit circle of the trochlea and capitellum was drawn, with its centre representing the rotation axis. Ninety degree tangent lines from the intramedullary axes of the ulna and humerus, and from the olecranon tip to the centre of rotation were drawn and measured relative to the rotation axis, representing the ulna posterior offset, humerus offset, and ulna proximal offset, respectively. In addition, we measured the ulna stem angle (angle subtended by the implant and the intramedullary axis of the ulna), as well as radial neck offset (the length of a 90o tangent line from the intramedullary axis of the radial neck and the centre of rotation) in patients with retained or replaced radial heads. Our primary outcome measure was the quickDASH score recorded at the latest follow-up for each patient. Our secondary outcome measures were postoperative flexion, extension, pronation and supination measured at the same timepoints. Each variable was tested for linear correlation with the primary and secondary outcome measures using the Pearson two-tailed test.

At an average follow-up of 6.8 years (range 2–14 years), there was a strong positive correlation between anterior radial neck offset and the quickDASH (r=0.60, p=0.001). There was also a weak negative correlation between the posterior offset of the ulnar component and the qDASH (r=0.39, p=0.031), and a moderate positive correlation between the change in humeral offset and elbow supination (r=0.41, p=0.044). The ulna proximal offset and ulna stem angle were not correlated with either the primary, or secondary outcome measures.

When performing primary TEA with radial head retention, or replacement, care should be taken to ensure that the ulnar component is correctly positioned such that intramedullary axis of the radial neck lines up with the centre of elbow rotation, as this strongly correlates with better function and less pain after surgery.

Hemiarthroplasty is a common procedure that is an attractive alternative to total arthroplasty because it conserves natural tissue, allows for quicker recovery, and has a lower cost. One significant issue with hemiarthroplasties is that they lead to accelerated wear of the opposing native cartilage, likely due to the high stiffness of the implant. The purpose of this study was to investigate the range of currently available biomaterials for hemiarthroplasty applications. We employed a finite-element (FE) model of a radial head implant against the native capitellum as our joint model.

The FE model was developed in ABAQUS v6.14 (Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA). A solid axisymmetric concave implant with seven different materials and the native radial head were evaluated, six modelled as elastic materials with different Young's moduli (E) and Poisson's Ratios (ν), and one modelled as a Mooney-Rivlin hyperelastic material. The materials investigated were CoCr (E=230 GPa, ν = 0.3), PEEK (E=3.7 GPa, ν = 0.36), HDPE (E=2.7 GPa, ν = 0.42), UHMWPE (E=0.69 GPa, ν = 0.49), Bionate 75D (E=0.288 GPa, ν = 0.39), Bionate 55D (E=0.039 GPa, ν = 0.45), and Bionate 80A (modelled as a Mooney-Rivlin hyperelastic material). A load of 100 N was applied to the radius through the center of rotation representing a typical load through the radius. The variable of interest was articular contact stress on the capitellum.

The CoCr implant had a maximum contact stress over 114% higher than the native radial head. By changing the material to lower the stiffness of the implant, the maximum contact stress was 24%, 70%, 105%, 111%, 113%, and 113% higher than the native radial head for Bionate 80A, Bionate 55D, Bionate 75D, UHMWPE, HDPE, and PEEK respectively.

This work shows that lowering implant stiffness can reduce the contact stress on cartilage in hemiarthroplasty implants. By changing the material below a Young's modulus of ∼100 MPa elevated stresses on the capitellum can be markedly reduced and hence potentially reduce or prevent degenerative changes of the native articulating cartilage. Low stiffness implant materials are not a novel concept, but to date there have been few that investigate materials (such as Bionate) as a potential load bearing material for implant applications. Further work is required to assess the efficacy of these materials for articular bearing applications.

Essex-Lopresti injuries are often unrecognized acutely with resulting debilitating adverse effects. Persistent axial forearm instability may affect load transmission at both the elbow and wrist, resulting in significant pain. In the setting of both acute and chronic injuries metallic radial head arthroplasty has been advocated, however there is little information regarding their outcome. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a radial head arthroplasty to address both acute and chronic Essex-Lopresti type injuries.

A retrospective review from 2006 to 2016 identified 11 Essex-Lopresti type injuries at a mean follow-up of 18 months. Five were diagnosed and treated acutely at a mean of 11 days (range, 8 to 19 days) from injury, while 6 were treated in a delayed fashion at a mean of 1.9 years (range, 2.7 months to 6.2 years) from injury with a mean 1.5 (range, 0 to 4) prior procedures. The cohort included 10 males with a mean age was 44.5 years (range, 28 to 71 years). A smooth stem, modular radial head arthroplasty was used in all cases. Outcomes included range of motion and radiographic findings such as ulnar variance, capitellar erosion, implant positioning and implant lucency using a modification of the method described by Gruen. Reoperations, including the need for ulnar shortening osteotomy, were also recorded.

Three patients in each group (55%) reported persistent wrist pain. The mean ulnar variance improved from +5 mm (range, 1.8 to 7 mm) to +3.7 mm (range, 1 to 6.3 mm) at the time of final follow-up or prior to reoperation. Three (50%) patients in the chronic group underwent a staged ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) to correct residual ulnar positive variance and to manage residual wrist pain. There were no reoperations in the acute group. Following USO, the ulnar variance in those three cases improved further to +3.5, +2.1, and −1.1 mm. No radial head prostheses required removal. Capitellar erosion was noted in five (45%) elbows, and was rated severe in one, moderate in two, and mild in two. Lucency about the radial head prosthesis stem was noted in eight (73%) cases, and rated as severe in 2 (18%), based on Gruen zones.

Treatment of acute and chronic Essex-Lopresti lesions with radial head arthroplasty often results in persistent wrist pain. In the chronic setting, a planned USO was often necessary to restore axial forearm stability after radial head arthroplasty. Essex-Lopresti lesions represent a rare clinical entity that are difficult treat, particularly in the chronic setting. Early recognition and management with a smooth stem modular radial head arthroplasty may provide improved outcomes compared to chronic reconstruction.

The role of anconeus in elbow stability has been a long-standing debate. Anatomical and electromyographic studies have suggested a potential role as a stabilizer. However, to our knowledge, no clinical or biomechanical studies have investigated its role in improving the stability of a lateral collateral ligament (LCL) deficient elbow.

Seven cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in an elbow motion simulator in the varus position. An LCL injured model was created by sectioning of the common extensor origin, and the LCL. The anconeus tendon and its aponeurosis were sutured in a Krackow fashion and tensioned to 10N and 20N through a transosseous tunnel at its origin. Varus-valgus angles and ulnohumeral rotations were recorded using an electromagnetic tracking system during simulated active elbow flexion with the forearm pronated and supinated. During active motion, the injured model resulted in a significant increase in varus angulation (5.3°±2.9°, P=.0001 pronation, 3.5°±3.4°, P=.001 supination) and external rotation (ER) (8.6°±5.8°, P=.001 pronation, 7.1°±6.1°, P=.003 supination) of the ulnohumeral articulation compared to the control state (varus angle −2.8°±3.4° pronation, −3.3°±3.2° supination, ER angle 2.1°±5.6° pronation, 1.6°±5.8° supination).

Tensioning of the anconeus significantly decreased the varus angulation (−1.2°±4.5°, P=.006 for 10N in pronation, −3.9°±4°, P=.0001 for 20N in pronation, −4.3°±4°, P=.0001 for 10N in supination, −5.3°±4.2°, P=.0001 for 20N in supination) and ER angle (2.6°±4.5°, P=.008 for 10N in pronation, 0.3°±5°, P=.0001 for 20N in pronation, 0.1°±5.3°, P=.0001 for 10N in supination, −0.8°±5.3°, P=.0001 for 20N in supination) of the injured elbow. Comparing anconeus tensioning to the control state, there was no significant difference in varus-valgus angulation except with anconeus tensioning to 20N with the forearm in supination which resulted in less varus angulation (P=1 for 10N in pronation, P=.267 for 20N in pronation, P=.604 for 10N in supination, P=.030 for 20N in supination). Although there were statistically significant differences in ulnohumeral rotation between anconeus tensioning and the control state (except with anconeus tensioning to 10N with the forearm in pronation which was not significantly different), anconeus tensioning resulted in decreased external rotation angle compared to the control state (P=1 for 10N in pronation, P=.020 for 20N in pronation, P=.033 for 10N in supination, P=.001 for 20N in supination).

In the highly unstable varus elbow orientation, anconeus tensioning restores the in vitro stability of an LCL deficient elbow during simulated active motion with the forearm in both pronation and supination. Interestingly, there was a significant difference in varus-valgus angulation between 20N anconeus tensioning with the forearm supinated and the control state, with less varus angulation for the anconeus tensioning which suggests that loads less than 20N is sufficient to restore varus stability during active motion with the forearm supinated. Similarly, the significant difference observed in ulnohumeral rotation between anconeus tensioning and the control state suggests that lesser degrees of anconeus tensioning would be sufficient to restore the posterolateral instability of an LCL deficient elbow. These results may have several clinical implications such as a potential role for anconeus strengthening in managing symptomatic lateral elbow instability.

Previous biomechanical studies of lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injuries and their surgical repair, reconstruction and rehabilitation have primarily relied on gravity effects with the arm in the varus position. The application of torsional moments to the forearm manually in the laboratory is not reproducible, hence studies to date likely do not represent forces encountered clinically.

The aim of this investigation was to develop a new biomechanical testing model to quantify posterolateral stability of the elbow using an in vitro elbow motion simulator.

Six cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in an elbow motion simulator in the varus position. A threaded screw was then inserted on the dorsal aspect of the proximal ulna and a weight hanger was used to suspend 400g, 600g, and 800g of weight from the screw head to allow torsional moments to be applied to the ulna. An LCL injured (LCLI) model was created by sectioning of the common extensor origin, and the LCL. Ulnohumeral rotation was recorded using an electromagnetic tracking system during simulated active and passive elbow flexion with the forearm pronated and supinated. A repeated measures analysis of variance was performed to compare elbow states (intact, LCLI, and LCLI with 400g, 600g, and 800g of weight).

During active motion, there was a significant difference between different elbow states (P=.001 pronation, P=.0001 supination). Post hoc analysis showed that the addition of weights did not significantly increase the external rotation (ER) of the ulnohumeral articulation (10°±7°, P=.268 400g, 10.5°±7.1°, P=.156 600g, 11°±7.2°, P=.111 800g) compared to the LCLI state (8.4°±6.4°) with the forearm pronated. However, with the forearm supinated, the addition of 800g of weight significantly increased the ER (9.2°±5.9°, P=.038) compared to the LCLI state (5.9°±5.5°) and the addition of 400g and 600g of weights approached significance (8.2°±5.7°, P=.083 400g, 8.7°±5.9°, P=.054 600g).

During passive motion, there was a significant difference between different elbow states (P=.0001 pronation, P=.0001 supination). Post hoc analysis showed that the addition of 600g and 800g but not 400g resulted in a significant increase in ER of the ulnohumeral articulation (9.3°±7.8°, P=.103 400g, 11.2°±6.2°, P=.004 600g, 12.7°±6.8°, P=.006 800g) compared to the LCLI state (3.7°±5.4°) with the forearm pronated. With the forearm supinated, the addition of 400g, 600g, and 800g significantly increased the ER (11.7°±6.7°, P=.031 400g, 13.5°±6.8°, P=.019 600g, 14.9°±6.9°, P=.024 800g) compared to the LCLI state (4.3°±6.6°).

This investigation confirms a novel biomechanical testing model for studying PLRI. Moreover, it demonstrates that the application of even small amounts of torsional moment on the forearm with the arm in the varus position exacerbates the rotational instability seen with the LCL deficient elbow. The effect of torsional loading was significantly worse with the forearm supinated and during passive elbow motion. This new model allows for a more provocative testing of elbow stability after LCL repair or reconstruction. Furthermore, this model will allow for smaller sample sizes to be used while still demonstrating clinically significant differences. Future biomechanical studies evaluating LCL injuries and their repair and rehabilitation should consider using this testing protocol.

Joint hemiarthroplasty replaces one side of a synovial joint and is a viable alternative to total joint arthroplasty when one side of the joint remains healthy. Most hemiarthroplasty implants used in current clinical practice are made from stiff materials such as cobalt chrome or ceramic. The substitution of one side of a soft cartilage-on-cartilage articulation with a rigid implant often leads to damage of the opposing articular cartilage due to the resulting reductions in contact area and increases in cartilage stress. The improvement of post-operative hemiarthroplasty articular contact mechanics is of importance in advancing the performance and longevity of hemiarthroplasty. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of hemiarthroplasty surface compliance on early in-vitro cartilage wear and joint contact mechanics.

Cartilage wear tests were conducted using a six-station pin-on-plate apparatus. Pins were manufactured to have a hemispherical radius of curvature of 4.7 mm using either Bionate (DSM Biomedical) having varying compliances (80A [E=20MPa], 55D [E=35MPa], 75D [E=222MPa], n=6 for each), or ceramic (E=310GPa, n=5). Cartilage plugs were cored from fresh unfrozen bovine knee joints using a 20 mm hole saw and mounted in lubricant-containing chambers, with alpha calf serum diluted with phosphate buffer solution to a protein concentration of 17 g/L. The pins were loaded to 30N and given a stroke length of 10 mm for a total of 50,000 cycles at 1.2 Hz. Volumetric cartilage wear was assessed by comparing three-dimensional cartilage scans before and during wear testing. A two-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis. To assess hemiarthroplasty joint contact mechanics, 3D finite element modelling (ABAQUS v6.12) was used to replicate the wear testing conditions. Cartilage was modeled using neo-Hookean hyper-elastic material properties. Contact area and peak contact stress were estimated.

The more compliant Bionate 80A and 55D pins produced significantly less volumetric cartilage wear compared with the less compliant Bionate 75D and ceramic pins (p 0.05). In terms of joint contact mechanics, the more compliant materials (Bionate 80A and 55D) had significantly lower maximum contact stress levels compared to the less compliant Bionate 75D and ceramic pins (p < 0 .05).

The results of this study show a relationship between hemiarthroplasty implant surface compliance and early in vitro cartilage wear, where the more compliant surfaces produced significantly lower amounts of cartilage wear. The results of the joint contact mechanics analysis showed that the more compliant hemiarthroplasty materials produced lower maximum cartilage contact stresses than the less compliant materials, likely related to the differences in wear observed. More compliant hemiarthroplasty surfaces may have the potential to improve post-operative cartilage contact mechanics by increasing the implant-cartilage contact area while reducing peak contact stress at the implant-cartilage interface, however, such materials must be resistant to surface fatigue and longer-term cartilage wear/damage must be assessed.

Purpose

The coronoid and collateral ligaments are key elbow stabilizers. When repair of comminuted coronoid fractures is not possible, prosthetic replacement may restore elbow stability. A coronoid prosthesis has been designed with an extended tip in an effort to augment elbow stability in the setting of residual collateral ligament insufficiency. The purpose of this biomechanical study, therefore, was to compare an anatomic coronoid replacement with an extended tip implant both with and without ligament insufficiency.

Purpose

Limited information is available regarding the functional outcomes of radial head fractures managed with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The purpose of this study was to determine the functional outcomes of radial head fractures treated with ORIF.

Purpose

Radial head implant over-lengthening, a common cause of capitellar wear and clinical failure, is difficult to diagnose using radiographs of the injured elbow. The purpose of this study was to determine if a novel measurement technique based on contralateral elbow radiographs, termed the RACER method, could be used to accurately estimate the magnitude of radial head implant over-lengthening. Part I of this study examined the side-to-side consistency of radiographic landmarks used in the measurement technique. Part II of this study validated the technique using simulated radial head implant over-lengthening in a cadaveric model.

Purpose

There have been a number of described techniques for sizing the diameter of radial head implants. All of these techniques, however, are dependent on measurements of the excised native radial head. When accurate sizing is not possible due to extensive comminution or due to a previous radial head excision, it has been postulated that the proximal radioulnar joint (PRUJ) may be used as an intraoperative landmark for correct sizing. The purpose of this study was to: 1) determine if the PRUJ could be used as a reliable landmark for radial head implant diameter sizing when the native radial head in unavailable, and (2) determine the reliability of measurements of the excised radial head.

Purpose

Current coronoid fracture classification systems are based on fragment size and configuration using plain radiographs and/or CT. During surgery, coronoid fracture fragments appear much larger than anticipated because cartilage is radiolucent and therefore not taken into account with preoperative imaging. The purpose of this study was to quantify the articular cartilage thickness of the coronoid process, with reference to coronoid fracture classifications.

Purpose

The coronoid process is an integral component for elbow stability. In the setting of a comminuted coronoid fracture, where repair is not possible, a prosthetic device may be beneficial in restoring elbow stability. The hypothesis of this in-vitro biomechanical study was that an anatomic coronoid prosthesis would restore stability to the coronoid deficient elbow.

Purpose

Capitellum hemiarthroplasty is an emerging concept. The current metallic capitellar implants have spherical surface shapes, but the native capitellum is not spherical. This study evaluated the effect of capitellar implant shape on the contact mechanics of the radiocapitellar joint when articulating with the native radial head.

Purpose: Techniques to quantify soft-tissue forces in the upper extremity are not well described. Consequently, ligament forces of the elbow joint have not been reported. Knowledge of the magnitudes of tension of the primary valgus stabilizer, the anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament (AMCL), would allow for an improved understanding of the load bourne by the ligament. The purpose of this in vitro study was to quantify the magnitude of tension in the native AMCL throughout flexion with the arm in the valgus orientation. We hypothesized that tension in the AMCL would increase with flexion.

Method: Five fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities (mean age 72 ± 10 years) were tested. To produce active muscle loading in a motion simulator, cables were affixed to the distal tendons of the brachialis, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, and brachioradialis and attached to actuators. The wrist was fixed in neutral flexion/extension and the forearm in neutral rotation. The arm was orientated in the valgus gravity-loaded position. A custom designed ligament load transducer was inserted into the AMCL. Active simulated flexion was achieved via computer-controlled actuation while passive elbow flexion was achieved by an investigator manually guiding the arm through flexion. Motion of the ulna relative to the humerus was measured using a tracking device.

Results: Both the active and passive motion pathways showed an increase in AMCL tension with increasing angles of elbow flexion (p < 0.05). There was no difference in AMCL tension levels between active and passive elbow flexion (p = 0.20). The mean maximum tension achieved was 97±33N and 94±40 N for active and passive testing respectively.

Conclusion: AMCL tension levels were observed to increase with elbow flexion, indicating that other structures (such as the joint capsule and the shape of the articulation) are likely more responsible for joint stability near full extension, and that the AMCL is recruited at increased angles of elbow flexion. With respect to load magnitudes, Regan et al. found the maximum load to failure of the AMCL was 261 N, while Armstrong et al. reported a failure load of 143 N in cyclic testing. The maximum AMCL tension level observed in this study was 160 N. Failure of the AMCL was not observed, which may be due to differences in specimen size, age, or the method of load application. In summary, this in vitro cadaveric study has provided a new understanding of the magnitudes of AMCL tension through the arc of elbow flexion, and this has important implications with respect to the desired target strength of repair and reconstruction techniques. These findings will also assist in the development and validation of computational models of the elbow.

Purpose: Most displaced olecranon fractures can be treated with ORIF. However with severe comminution or bone loss, excision of the fragments and repair of the triceps to the ulna is recommended. The triceps can be reattached to either the anterior or posterior aspect of the ulna. The purpose of this in-vitro study was to determine the effect of triceps repair technique on elbow laxity and extension strength in the setting of olecranon deficiency.

Method: Eight unpreserved cadaveric arms were used (age 75 ± 11 years). Surface models were generated from CT images and sequential olecranon resections in 25% increments were performed using real-time navigation. Muscle tendons (biceps, brachialis, brachioradialis and triceps) were sutured to actuators of an elbow motion simulator, which produced active extension. A tracking system recorded kinematics in the varus and valgus positions. A triceps advancement was performed using either an anterior or posterior repair to the remaining olecranon in random order. Triceps extension strength was measured in the dependent position with the elbow flexed 90° using a force transducer located at the distal ulnar styloid, while triceps tension was increased from 25–200 N. Outcome variables included maximum varus-valgus elbow laxity and triceps extension strength. Two-way repeated measures ANOVAs were performed for laxity comparing resection level and repair method. Three-way repeated measures ANOVAs were performed for triceps extension strength comparing triceps tension, resection level and repair method. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results: Progressive olecranon resection increased elbow laxity (p < 0.001). Although the posterior repair produced slightly greater laxity for all but the 50% resection, this difference was not significant (p = 0.2). The posterior repair provided greater extension strength than the anterior repair at all applied triceps tensions and for all olecranon resections (p = 0.01). The initial 0% resection reduced extension strength for both repairs (p < 0.01), however, there was no effect of progressive olecranon resections (p = 0.09).

Conclusion: There was no significant difference in laxity between the anterior and posterior repairs. Thus even for large olecranon resections, the technique of triceps repair does not have significant influence on joint stability. Extension strength was not reduced by progressive olecranon resections, perhaps due to wrapping of the triceps tendon around the trochlea putting it in-line with the ulna and giving it a constant moment arm. Triceps extension strength was higher for the posterior repair. This is likely due to the greater distance and hence moment arm of the posterior repair to the joint rotation center. Conversely, the anterior repair brings the triceps insertion closer to the joint center, reducing the moment arm. Since there was no significant difference in laxity between the repairs, the authors favour the posterior repair due to its significantly higher triceps extension strength.

Purpose: This in-vitro study examined the effect of simulated Colles fractures on load transmitted to the distal ulna, using an in-line load cell. Our hypothesis was distal radial fracture malposition will increase distal radial ulnar joint (DRUJ) load relative to the native position of the radius.

Method: Eight fresh frozen upper-extremities were mounted in a motion simulator which enabled active forearm rotation. An osteotomy was performed just proximal to the distal radioulnar joint, and a 3-degree of freedom modular appliance was implanted which simulated Colles type distal radial fracture deformities. This device allowed for accurate adjustment of dorsal angulation and translation (0, 10, 20 and 30 degrees dorsal angulation and 0, 5 and 10mm dorsal translation both isolated and in combination). A 6-DOF load cell was inserted in the distal ulna 1.5 cm proximal to the ulnar head to quantify DRUJ joint forces. Distal ulnar loading was measured following simulated distal radial deformities with both an intact and sectioned triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC).

Results: The maximum resultant transverse distal ulnar load occurred during active forearm pronation and supination. Increasing magnitudes of dorsal angulation and translation of the distal radius increased loading in the distal ulna. For pronation with the ligaments intact, the transverse resultant load for the non-fracture, native positioning was significantly lower (p< 0.05) than the majority of malpositioned cases except for the translations only (not combined with angulation). However, all fracture orientations for supination had an increased effect on the resultant loading (p< 0.05) when ligaments were intact. Greater forces were measured in the distal ulna when the TFCC intact relative to TFCC sectioning. Sectioning the TFCC eliminated the effect of fracture malposition for both pronation and supination. The range of maximum transverse force for intact pronation and supination was between 118& #61617;34N and 130& #61617;39N, respectively. Similarly, for sectioned pronation and supination, the maximum transverse forces were and 93& #61617;40N and 89& #61617;24N, respectively.

Conclusion: Malpositioning of distal radial fractures in dorsal translation and angulation was found to increase forces in the distal ulna, which may be an important source of residual pain following malunion of Colles fractures. Healing of the distal radius in an anatomic position resulted in the least forces. Sectioning the TFCC released the tethering effect of the radius on the ulna, decreasing DRUJ force. This is the first study of its kind to attempt to quantify the forces at the DRUJ as a result of Colles fractures, and these early findings provide important baseline information related to the biomechanics of the DRUJ.

Purpose: The identification of anatomical landmarks is an important aspect of joint surgery, to ensure proper placement and alignment for implants and other reconstructive procedures. At the elbow, the center of the capitellum (derived via a digitization of the surface and subsequent sphere fitting) has been well established as a key landmark to identify the axis of rotation of the joint. For some cases, and in particular minimally invasive surgery, only small regions of the capitellum may be exposed which may lead to errors in determining the centre. The purpose of this study was to identify the optimal location of digitizations of the capitellum.

Method: Twenty-five fresh frozen cadaveric distal humeri (19 left, 6 right) were studied. Using an x-ray computed tomography scanner, volumetric images of each specimen were acquired and used to reconstruct a 3-dimensional digital model of the specimen using the Visualization Toolkit (VTK). A sphere-fit algorithm was used to determine the centre of the spherical capitellum based on manually chosen (digitized) points across the 3D capitellar surface. The true geometric centre was located by digitizing points across the entire capitellar surface. Three sub-regions of the capitellum, commensurate with typical surgical approaches with minimal dissection, were then digitized. These were superior anterior lateral (SAL), inferior anterior lateral (IAL) and a combination of these two regions. These regions were compared to the true center using a 1-way Repeated Measures ANOVA with significance set to p = 0.05.

Results: Digitizations of only SAL and IAL sub-regions resulted in the largest differences relative to the true centre: SAL = 3.9±3.4 mm, IAL = 4.2±3.4 mm, (p < 0.0005). There was no difference between SAL and IAL (p = 1.0). Digitization of the combined SAL + IAL regions, while significantly different from the entire capitellum, resulted in the smallest mean difference of 0.87±0.84 mm.

Conclusion: These data show that the region of digitization affects the accuracy of predicting the capitellum centre. In a previous study by our group, we showed that an accurate determination of the centre of a sphere can be achieved with a small surface area of digitization. In the current study, the large errors that occurred when a small surface was digitized (i.e. SAL and IAL alone), are in all likelihood, due the non-spherical nature of the capitellum. In summary, while the most precise method in locating the true centre is to digitize the entire capitellar surface where possible, an alternative approach is to digitize both the superior and inferior anterior lateral regions.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of serial olecranon resections on elbow stability.

Method: Eight fresh, previously frozen cadaveric arms underwent CT scanning. The specimens were mounted in an in-vitro motion simulator, and kinematic data was obtained using an electromagnetic tracking system. Simulated active and passive flexion was produced with servo-motors and pneumatic pistons attached to specific muscles. Flexion was studied in the dependent, horizontal, varus, and valgus positions. Custom computer navigation software was utilized to guide serial resection of the olecranon in 12.5% increments. A triceps advancement repair was performed following each resection.

Results: Serial olecranon resections resulted in a significant increase in valgus-varus (V-V) laxity for both passive (p< 0.001) and active (p=0.04) flexion. For passive motion this increase reached statistical significance following the 12.5% resection. This corresponded to an increase in V-V laxity of 1.4 ± 0.1o and a total laxity of 7.5 ± 1.0o. For active flexion this increase reached significance following the 62.5% resection. This corresponded to an increase in V-V laxity of 5.6 ± 1.1o and a total laxity of 11.2 ± 1.5. There was no significant effect of sequential olecranon excision on elbow kinematics or stability with the elbow in the vertical or horizontal positions. The elbows became grossly unstable after resection of greater than 75% of the olecranon.

Conclusion: A progressive increase in the varus-valgus laxity of the elbow was seen with sequential excision of the olecranon. Laxity of the elbow was increased with excision of 75% of the olecranon, likely due to the loss of the bony congruity and attachment site of the posterior band of the medial collateral ligament. Gross instability resulted when 87.5% or greater was removed, likely due to damage to the anterior band of the medial collateral ligament as it inserts on the sublime tubercle of the ulna. Rehabilitation of the elbow with the arm in the dependant position should be considered following excision of the olecranon; varus and valgus orientations should be avoided. The contribution of the olecranon to elbow stability may be even more important in patients with associated ligament injuries or fractures of the elbow.

Purpose: The role of the posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament (PMCL) in stability of the elbow remains poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of sectioning the PMCL on the stability of the elbow.

Method: Varus and valgus gravity-loaded passive elbow motion and simulated active vertical elbow motion were performed on 11 cadaveric arms. An in-vitro elbow motion simulator, utilizing computer-controlled pneumatic actuators and servo-motors sutured to tendons, was used to simulate active elbow flexion. Varus/valgus angle and internal/external rotation of the ulna with respect to the humerus were recorded using an electromagnetic tracking system. Testing was performed on the intact elbow and following sectioning of the PMCL.

Results: With active flexion in the vertical position the varus/valgus kinematics were unchanged after PMCL sectioning (p=0.08). However, with the forearm in pronation, there was a significant increase in internal rotation after PMCL sectioning compared to the intact elbow (p< 0.05) which was most evident at 0° and 120° degrees of flexion (p< 0.05). This rotational difference was not statistically significant with the forearm in supination (p=0.07). During supinated passive flexion in the varus position, PMCL sectioning resulted in increased varus angulation at all flexion angles (p< 0.05). In pronation varus angulation was only increased at 120° of flexion (p< 0.05). However, internal rotation was increased at flexion angles of 30° to 120° (p< 0.05). In supination, sectioning the PMCL had no significant effect on maximum varus-valgus laxity or maximum internal rotation (p=0.1). However, in pronation, the maximum varus-valgus laxity increased by 3.5° (30%) and maximum internal rotation increased by 1.0° (29%) (p< 0.05).

Conclusion: These results indicate that isolated sectioning of the PMCL causes a small increase in varus angulation and internal rotation during both passive varus and active vertical flexion. This study suggests that isolated sectioning of the PMCL may not be completely benign and may contribute to varus and rotation instability of the elbow. In patients with insufficiency of the PMCL appropriate rehabilitation protocols (avoiding forearm pronation and shoulder abduction) should be followed when other injuries permit.

Purpose: Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the capitellum most commonly affects adolescent pitchers and gymnasts, and presents with pain and mechanical symptoms. Fragment excision is the most commonly employed surgical treatment; however, patients with larger lesions have been reported to have poorer outcomes. It’s not clear whether this is due to increased contact pressures on the surrounding articular surface, or if fragment excision causes instability of the elbow. The purpose of this study was to determine if fragment excision of simulated OCD lesions of the capitellum alters kinematics and stability of the elbow.

Method: Nine fresh-frozen cadaveric arms were mounted in an upper extremity joint motion simulator, with cables attaching the tendons of the major muscle tendons to motors and pneumatic actuators. Electromagnetic receivers attached to the radius and ulna enabled quantification of the kinematics of both bones with respect to the humerus. Three-dimensional CT scans were used to plan lesions of 12.5% (mean 0.8cm2), 25%, 37.5%, 50%, and 100% (mean 6.2cm2) of the capitellar surface, which were marked on the capitellum using navigation. Lesions were created by burring through cartilage and subchondral bone. The arms were subjected to active and passive flexion in both the vertical and valgus-loaded positions, and passive forearm rotation in the vertical position.

Results: No significant differences in varus-valgus or rotational ulnohumeral kinematics were found between any of the simulated OCD lesions and the elbows with an intact articulation with active and passive flexion, regardless of forearm rotation and the orientation of the arm (p> 0.7). Radiocapitellar kinematics were not significantly affected during passive forearm rotation with the arm in the vertical position (p=0.07–0.6).

Conclusion: In this in-vitro biomechanical study even large simulated OCD lesions of the capitellum did not alter the kinematics or laxity of the elbow at either the radiocapitellar or ulnohumeral joints. These data suggest that excision of capitellar fragments not amenable to fixation can be considered without altering elbow kinematics or decreasing stability. Further study is required to examine other factors, such as altered contact stresses on the remaining articulation, that are thought to contribute to poorer outcomes in patients with larger lesions.