Aim

To assess whether recurrence of PJI and osteomyelitis impacts patient-reported quality of life (QoL).

Bone and joint infections are not only common but their management can be technically complex. They carry significant healthcare costs and are a daunting experience for patients [1]. Frequently, multiple operations are required in order to treat the infection. Each surgical intervention usually results in greater bone loss, worsening skin and soft tissue scarring and increasingly diverse and resistant micro- organisms [2].

Specialist bone infection units involving highly integrated orthopaedic and plastic surgery, as well as infection physicians, may improve patient outcomes [3–4]. However, it is difficult to determine the hierarchy of factors contributing to outcome of treatment. This problem is confounded by a lack of structured, prospective data collection in many units around the world.

In 2014, we designed a modular database which allows collection of patients’ details, components of the disease, the treatment, microbiology, histology, clinical outcome and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS). The registry was implemented in November 2014 and has already demonstrated its function as a Hospital-wide service evaluation tool.

Over 200 patients have been referred to the unit and their baseline demographic information registered. Their progress through the bone infection unit patient pathway is prospectively monitored with use of the registry and data collection ongoing. We aim to present the preliminary clinical outcomes of these 200 patients including surgical procedures performed, key microbiology results, antibiotic treatment regimens and patient reported outcomes.

Our goal is to demonstrate that a bone infection registry is an integral part of infection management clinical practice. It can be used for designing service provision, assist in allocating healthcare resources and expand the evidence base for specialist bone infection units in managing complex orthopaedic infections.

To compare the costs of treatment and income received for treating patients with tibial osteomyelitis, comparing limb salvage with amputation.

We derived direct hospital costs of care for ten consecutive patients treated with limb salvage procedures and five consecutive patients who underwent amputation, for tibial osteomyelitis. We recorded all factors which affect the cost of treatment. Financial data from the Patient-Level Information and Costing System (PLICS) allowed calculation of hospital costs and income received from payment under the UK National Tariff. Hospital payment is based on primary diagnosis, operation code, length of stay, patient co-morbidities and supplements for custom implants or external fixators.

Our primary outcome measure was net income/loss for each in-patient episode.

The mean age of patients undergoing limb salvage was 55 years (range 34–83 years) whereas for amputation this was 61 years (range 51–83 years). Both groups were similar in Cierny and Mader Staging, requirement for soft-tissue reconstruction, anaesthetic technique, diagnostics, drug administration and antibiotic therapy.

In the limb salvage group, there were two infected non-unions requiring Ilizarov method and five free flaps. Mean hospital stay was 15 days (10–27). Mean direct cost of care was €16,718 and mean income was €9,105, resulting in an average net loss of €7,613 per patient. Patients undergoing segmental resection with Ilizarov bifocal reconstruction and those with the longest length of stay generated the greatest net loss.

In the amputation group, there were 3 above knee and 2 below knee amputations for failed previous treatment of osteomyelitis or infected non-union. Mean hospital stay was 13 days (8–17). Mean direct cost of care was €18,441 and mean income was €15,707, resulting in an average net loss of €2,734 per patient. Length of stay was directly proportional to net loss.

The UK National Tariff structure does not provide sufficient funding for treatment of osteomyelitis of the tibia by either reconstruction or amputation. Average income for a patient admitted for limb salvage is €6,602 less than that for amputation even though the surgery is frequently more technically demanding (often requiring complex bone reconstruction and free tissue transfer) and the length of hospital stay is longer.

Although both are significantly loss-making, the net loss for limb salvage is more than double that for amputation. This makes treatment of tibial osteomyelitis in the UK National Health Service unsustainable in the long term.

To evaluate the clinical outcome of three different local antibiotic delivery materials, used as bone defect fillers after excision of chronic osteomyelitis.

We reviewed all patients receiving Collagen Fleece with Gentamicin (Septocoll E)(n=74), Calcium Sulphate with Tobramycin pellets (Osteoset T)(n=166) or Calcium Sulphate/Hydroxyapatite biocomposite with Gentamicin (Cerament G)(n=73) for dead space filling after resection of C-M Stage III and IV chronic osteomyelitis. Data was collected on patient comorbidities, operation details, microbiology, postop complications and need for plastic surgery or external fixation. All operations were performed by two surgeons. All patients had similar systemic antibiotic therapy and rehabilitation.

Primary outcomes were recurrence rate, fracture rate and wound leakage rate.

All three groups had very similar mean age and range, microbiological cultures, need for free muscle flaps or local flaps, proportion of femur, tibia and upper limb bones and use of external fixation. There were small differences in the proportion of C-M Class B hosts and anatomic Type IV cases, between the groups. All patients were followed up for at least one year. Mean follow-up was 1.75 years for Septocoll E, 1.96 years for Osteoset T and 1.78 years for Cerament G.

After surgery, there were fewer prolonged wound leaks with Cerament G (leakage persisting for more than 2 weeks). Fracture rates and infection recurrence were twice as common with Osteoset T compared with Cerament G at between one and two years after operation (see Table).

The use of a biocomposite material delivering local aminoglycoside was associated with lower recurrence rates and few wound problems, compared with collagen or calcium sulphate alone. This may reflect the higher levels of antibiotic in the defect and controlled release profile. The improved recurrence rate was despite a higher percentage of compromised Class B hosts.