Although the most commonly used method of femoral component alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an intramedullary (IM) guides, this method demonstrated a limited degree of accuracy. The purpose of this study was to assess whether a portable, accelerometer-based surgical navigation system (Knee Align 2 system; Orth Align, Inc, Aliso Viejo, Calif) improve accuracy of the post-operative radiographic femoral component alignment compared to conventional IM alignment guide. Since February 2014, 44 consecutive patients (39 female, 5 male) with primary arthritis of the knee were enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled study. 24 patients underwent TKA (Vanguard RP or PS, Biomet Japan) using the navigation device for the distal femoral resection (Navigated Group), and 20 patients with conventional femoral IM alignment guide. The proximal tibial resection was performed using an extramedullary guide. All the operation was performed by a single senior surgeon (YK) with the same gap balancing technique except for the use of the navigation system for the femur. Accuracy of femoral implant positioning was evaluated on 2 weeks postoperative standing anteroposterior (AP) hip to ankle radiographs.INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS & METHODS
Rotational alignment of the femoral and tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are separately determined based on the anatomy of each bone. Popular references are the transepicondylar axis (TEA) for femoral component, and medial one-third of the tibial tubercle for the tibial component. It was reported that these references are not in accordance with each other in osteoarthritic (OA) knees and rotational mismatch could occur even when the components were accurately aligned. There has been, however, a paucity of data as for the rotational mismatch after TKA for OA knees. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rotational mismatch between the femoral and tibial component after TKA for OA knees. Eighty-four knees which underwent primary TKA for the varus osteoarthritis of the knee were analyzed. Those knees were chosen by the retrospective confirmation of the precise rotational alignments of both femoral and tibial components by postoperative computed tomography (with ±3 degrees to the targeted reference lines described below). The femoral reference line was the surgical epicondylar axis and the tibial reference line was Akagi's line; a line connecting the midpoint of the tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament and the medial border of patellar tendon. Intraoperative, dynamic evaluations of the rotational mismatch between femoral and tibial components was performed with a special device attached to the mobile-bearing trials at full extension and in neutral, passive external rotation and passive internal rotation.INTRODUCTION
SUBJECTS & METHODS
It has been reported that rotational deformity is present in varus osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee and the tibia rotates externally as the varus deformity progresses. Although many studies addressed the rotational alignment of the femoral and tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the pre-and postoperative changes of the rotational alignment in varus OA knee has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively analyze the alteration of rotational deformity after TKA for the varus OA knee. Between July 2011 and December 2012, 157 patients (159 knees) with primary varus OA knee undergoing TKA were included. A mobile-bearing, posterior stabilized knee prosthesis was implanted with cement in all patients. Rotational deformities were evaluated with computed tomography (CT) before and after the operation. On the selected CT slices, the relative rotational position of the femur and tibia was quantified as an angle between the line perpendicular to the surgical epicondylar axis of the femur and the line connecting the tibial tubercle tip and the geometric center of the tibia. The knees were divided into three groups according to the preoperative varus deformity (Group I; 0–8° varus, n = 78, Group II; 9–17 ° varus, n = 71 and Group III; 18 ° or greater varus, n = 10) and the difference among the groups were statistically analyzed.INTRODUCTION:
METHODS:
Over the past decade, there has been an increase in the number of total knee arthropalsty (TKA). Demand of TKA for the young patients who often have high physical demands is also increasing. However, the revision rate in such young patients is much higher due to polyethylene (PE) wear and instability (Julin J, Acta Orthop 2010). Therefore, next generation total knee prostheses are expected to decrease PE wear and to provide stability. Although Patients who underwent bilateral staged TKAs were more likely to prefer medial pivot prosthesis or ACL-PCL retaining prosthesis than the other types of prostheses, because they feels “more stable overall” (Pritchett JW, J Arthroplasty 2011). The excellent mid-term clinical results of those newly introduced total knee prosthesis, such as alumina medial pivot TKA (Iida T, ORS 2008), medial pivot TKA (Mannan K, JBJS Br 2009, Kakachalions T, Knee 2009), ACL-PCL retaining TKA (Clouter JM, JBJS Am 1999), and highly cross-linked PE (Hodrick JT, CORR 2008), have been reported. From the point of view of