Performance of metal-on-metal (MOM) bearings was of great interest until recently. Major concerns emerged over high incidence of MOM-wear failures and initially there appeared greater risks with MOM total hip arthroplasty (THA) designs compared to resurfacing arthroplasty (RSA). Impingement of the metal neck against the THA cup was likely the differentiating risk. There is a major difference between RSA and THA in (i) size of femoral necks and (ii) risk of THA metal necks impinging on metal cups. For example, a 46mm THA with 12.5mm neck, a 3.68 head:neck (H/N) ratio, provides a suitably large range-of-motion (ROM). In contrast, an RSA patient with retained 31mm size of natural neck would only have H/N = 1.48, indicating even less ROM than a Charnley THA. However, the enigma is that RSA patients have as good or better ROM in majority of clinical studies. We studied this apparent RSA vs THA dilemma by examining MOM retrievals for signs of adverse impingement. We previously described CoCr stripe wear in failed THA bearings, notably alignment of polar and basal wear stripes coincident with the rim profiles of the cups (Clarke 2013). Our governing hypothesis was that RSA patients had to routinely sublux their hips to get ROM comparable to THA. Our THA impingement studies showed polar stripes within 15o of the polar axis in large heads. For the various RSA diameters, we calculated that wear stripes angled 40o from the femoral axis could indicate impingement with no subluxation, whereas smaller angles would indicate routine subluxation of RSA femoral-shell from cup. We compared explanted RSA (N=15) and THA (N=15) bearings representing three vendors (42–54mm diameters). Wear maps and head-stripes were ink-marked for visualization, photography, and analysis. Wear areas were calculated using spherical equations and wear-stripe angles measured by computer graphics.

The results showed that RSA femoral shells had wear areas circular in shape with areas varying 1,085- 3,121mm2. These averaged 14% larger than in matched THA heads but statistically significant difference was not proven. Polar stripes were readily identifiable on femoral components, 75% for RSA cases and 100% for THA. These contained identical linear scratches and all were sited within 30o of neck axis, confirming our hypothesis that RSA patients had to sublux their hips to achieve same motion as THA. Examination of cup wear areas revealed all showed ‘edge-loading’, but RSA cups had a significantly greater degree.

Retrieval studies are limited by uncontrolled case sources, varied brands, and small numbers. In this study, we were able to match RSA and THA cases by vendor and diameter. The RSA retrievals revealed polar stripes identical to THA by site, topography and inclination to femoral-neck axis. This confirmed our starting hypothesis and explained the large clinical ROM available in RSA patients. The larger wear areas on RSA femoral shells, although not statistically significant, and the larger ‘edge loading’ sites in RSA cups appeared as further support for routine subluxation of femoral-shells during hip impingement.

A number of studies have reported longer length of hospital stay (LOS) after surgery in patients with higher ASA grades. The impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on LOS after Total Hip Replacement (THR) remains unclear with conflicting findings in reported literature. In our hospital we strongly encourage all patients with a raised BMI to participate in a weight reduction programme prior to surgery. This prompted us to investigate the impact BMI has on LOS compared to the more established impact of ASA grade.

A retrospective analysis was conducted on all elective primary THR patients between 11/2013 to 02/2014. LOS in BMI groups <30, 30–39 and ≥40 and ASA grades 1–2 and 3–4 was compared. Where appropriate, independent t-test and non-parametric Mann-Whitney test were used to predict significance.

122 THR were analysed. Mean LOS in BMI groups <30, 30–39 and ≥40 were 5.6, 6.2 and 8.0 days, respectively. This was not predicted significant (p=0.7). Mean LOS in ASA groups 1–2 and 3–4 were 5.2 and 9.3, respectively. This was predicted significant (p-value < 0.01).

In patients undergoing primary THR, ASA grade is a better predictor of LOS than BMI. Our data adds to the evidence that high BMI alone is not a significant factor in prolonging LOS after a primary THR. This should be taken into account when allocating resources to optimise patients for surgery.

Metal-on-metal (MOM) retrieval studies have demonstrated that CoCr bearings used in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and resurfacing (RSA) featured stripe wear damage on heads, likely created by rim impact with CoCr cups.^1-3 Such subluxation damage may release quantities of large CoCr particles that would provoke aggressive 3^rd-body wear. With RSA, the natural femoral neck reduces the head-neck ratio but avoids risk of metal-to-metal impingement (Fig. 1).⁴ For this study, twelve retrieved RSA were compared to 12 THA (Table 1), evaluating, (i) patterns of habitual wear, (ii) stripe-wear damage and (iii) 3^rd-body abrasive scratches. Considering RSA have head/neck ratios much lower than large-diameter THA, any impingement damage should be uniquely positioned on the heads.

Twelve RSA and THA retrievals were selected with respect to similar diameter range and vendors with follow-up ranging typically 1–6 years (Table 1). Patterns of habitual wear were mapped to determine position in vivo. Stripe damage was mapped at three sites: polar, equatorial and basal. Wear patterns were examined using SEM and white light interferometry (WLI). Graphical models characterized the complex geometry of the natural femoral neck in coronal and sagittal planes and provided RSA head-neck ratios.⁴

Normal area patterns of habitual wear were similar on RSA and THA bearings. The wear patterns showing cup rim-breakout proved larger for RSA cups than THA. Polar stripes presented in juxtaposition to the polar axis in both RSA and THA (Fig. 1). As anticipated, basal stripes on RSA occurred at steeper cup-impingement angles (CIA) than THA. The micro-topography of stripe damage was similar on both RSA and THA heads. Some scratches were illustrative of 3^rd-body wear featuring raised lips, punctuated terminuses, and crater-like depressions (Fig. 2).

Neck narrowing observed following RSA procedures may be a consequence of impingement and subluxation due to the small head-neck ratios. However, lacking a metal femoral neck, such RSA impingement would not result in metal debris being released. Nevertheless it has been suggested that cup-to-head impingement produced large CoCr particles and also cup “edge wear” as the head orbits the cup rim.⁴ Our study showed that impingement had occurred as evidenced by the polar stripes and 3^rd-body wear by large hard particles as evidenced by the wide scratches with raised lips. We can therefore agree with the prior study, that 2-body and 3rd-body wear mechanisms were present in both RSA and THA retrievals.

Summary

162 patient cohort with serial Metal Artefact Reduction Sequence MRI scans. Patients with normal initial scans can be followed up at 1 year. Those with abnormal scans should be followed up at a shorter interval of 6 months.

Plasma levels of cobalt and chromium ions and Metal Artefact Reduction Sequence (MARS)-MRI scans were performed on patients with 209 consecutive, unilateral, symptomatic metal-on-metal (MoM) hip arthroplasties. There was wide variation in plasma cobalt and chromium levels, and MARS-MRI scans were positive for adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) in 84 hips (40%). There was a significant difference in the median plasma cobalt and chromium levels between those with positive and negative MARS-MRI scans (p < 0.001). Compared with MARS-MRI as the potential reference standard for the diagnosis of ARMD, the sensitivity of metal ion analysis for cobalt or chromium with a cut-off of > 7 µg/l was 57%. The specificity was 65%, positive predictive value was 52% and the negative predictive value was 69% in symptomatic patients. A lowered threshold of > 3.5 µg/l for cobalt and chromium ion levels improved the sensitivity and negative predictive value to 86% and 74% but at the expense of specificity (27%) and positive predictive value (44%).

Metal ion analysis is not recommended as a sole indirect screening test in the surveillance of symptomatic patients with a MoM arthroplasty. The investigating clinicians should have a low threshold for obtaining cross-sectional imaging in these patients, even in the presence of low plasma metal ion levels.

NICE guidelines state patients undergoing elective TKR receive post-operative chemical prophylaxis unless contraindicated, following guideline implementation our aim was to determine VTE incidence and wound complication outcomes related to administration of Rivaroxaban or Enoxaparin.

From April to October 2010 we prospectively studied 294 patients having primary or revision TKR. Each received either Rivaroxoban (n=219), Enoxaparin (n=68), UHF 5000 units (n=4) or no thromboprohylaxis (n=3) post-operatively. Primary outcome was identification of symptomatic post-operative VTE incidence and compared incidence over the same period in 2009 when aspirin was the standard chemical prophylaxis for VTE. Secondary outcomes were prolonged wound oozing rates and wound washout.

VTE occurred in 3 of 219 patients (2 PE, 1 DVT) receiving Rivaroxaban, and 1 PE in a patient who did not receive any thromboprophylaxis. No patients prescribed Enoxaparin developed VTE. In the same period 2009 there were 21 confirmed PEs in 512 patients undergoing TKR. This was statistically significant (Chi squared test p=0.02).

Prolonged oozing was noted in 3 patients receiving Enoxaparin, and 17 patients receiving Rivaroxaban. 6 patients treated with Rivaroxaban returned to theatre, 3 for continuous ooze, 2 for wound dehiscence and 1 for infection. During the same period in 2009, there was only 1 return to theatre for haematoma washout. (Chi squared test; p=0.02).

Following the NICE guidelines, there is a reduction in the PE rate following TKR but there is an increase in the overall return to theatre rate.

INTRODUCTION

The risk of dislocation in large diameter metal on metal hip replacement is significantly lower than in standard THR. This is due to the increased primary arc, increased jump distance and possibly a suction effect. Our unit has performed over 1500 of these cases with an overall revision rate of <1%. We report a case series of dislocations in 5 large diameter metal on metal hips undertaken at our unit.

Aim

To determine the outcome, the need for revision surgery, quality of life (QOL) of patients and the financial implications of instability following successful closed reduction of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

From 2004–2006, in an attempt to reduce the waiting time for patients listed for total knee and total hip arthroplasty at Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust, 156 total hip replacements (THRs) were performed by Swedish Orthopaedic surgeons at an NHS treatment centre in England.

All patients were contacted and invited to a review appointment with a Consultant specialising in hip and revision hip replacement. Oxford Hip Scores and clinical and radiographic evaluation were performed. Patients who declined an appointment were sent a postal questionnaire. Radiographs were analysed for component position, radiolucent lines, medial floor breach, leg length discrepancy.

One hundred and thirteen hips were reviewed at a mean 23 month follow-up. The mean Oxford score was 26. Mean age at surgery was 69. Cemented THR was performed in 104 hips; hybrid in 7; cementless in 2. The Exeter stem and Cenator cemented cup were used in the majority of cases. 16% had acetabular inclination greater than 55 degrees. Radiolucent lines around the cup were seen in 76/113 hips. Femoral stem position was greater than 4 degrees varus in 47/113. Medial floor breach seen in 13/113. 10/113 had leg length discrepancy > 1cm. There were 3 dislocations, 1 femoral fracture, 1 pulmonary embolus, 3 deep infections, 2 superficial infections.

Revision surgery has been performed in 18/113 – the majority for a painful loose acetabular component. A further 5/113 have been recommended for surgery. The further surgery rate was 12% at 2 year follow-up.

The revision rate far exceeds the 0.5% 5-year failure rate reported in the Swedish Registry for the components used. This initiative has left a legacy of unhappy patients, and increased the workload required in our unit to correct the problems. The lack of long-term ownership of patients may be an important factor.

We have studied the natural history of a first episode of dislocation after primary total hip replacement (THR) to clarify the incidence of recurrent dislocation, the need for subsequent revision and the quality of life of these patients.

Over a six-year period, 99 patients (101 hips) presented with a first dislocation of a primary THR. A total of 61 hips (60.4%) had dislocated more than once. After a minimum follow-up of one year, seven patients had died. Of the remaining 94 hips (92 patients), 47 underwent a revision for instability and one awaits operation (51% in total). Of these, seven re-dislocated and four needed further surgery. The quality of life of the patients was studied using the Oxford Hip Score and the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire. A control group of patients who had not dislocated was also studied. At a mean follow-up of 4.5 years (1 to 20), the mean Oxford Hip Score was 26.7 (15 to 47) after one episode of dislocation, 27.2 (12 to 45) after recurrent dislocation, 34.5 (12 to 54) after successful revision surgery, 42 (29 to 55) after failed revision surgery and 17.4 (12 to 32) in the control group. The EuroQol-5 dimension questionnaire revealed more health problems in patients undergoing revision surgery.

Aim: To determine the outcome and need for subsequent surgery in patients following successful closed reduction of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and the financial implications of re-operation.

Methods: Data was retrospectively obtained from radiographs and patient case notes for all dislocated primary hip replacements presenting to the University Hospital of Wales from January 2000 till November 2005. Records were analysed with a minimum of 1 year follow-up to determine the outcome and need for subsequent surgery following successful closed reduction of dislocation after primary THA. Factors studied include age at primary surgery, indications, components, approach, head size, duration since surgery and direction of dislocation

Results: Over the 6 year study period, 98 patients presented with 100 first time dislocated primary total hip replacements. All the dislocations underwent successful closed reduction. 62 (62%) hips re-dislocated more that once. At minimum follow up of 1 year, 7 patients had died and were excluded from the final study group. Of the remaining 93 hips, 46 patients have had no further surgery. 44 THA’s have undergone revision procedures and 3 are waiting to have revision surgery (51% in total). Of those who have undergone revision surgery, 7 hips re-dislocated since and 3 of those needed further re-revision.

Discussion: Dislocation following primary THA remains a problem with varying dislocation rates quoted in the literature. In our series, 51% of patients presenting with dislocation required revision surgery. All patients in this series had 28 mm or smaller femoral heads. The financial impact of the burden of revision surgery continues to increase. In this series in isolation the cost of revision surgery totalled greater that £500,000.

Aim: To investigate the outcome following revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using 36 mm and 40 mm modular femoral heads.

Methods: Details were retrieved from our arthroplasty database regarding all revision THAs done in our unit using 36 mm and 40 mm femoral heads. Follow-up information was obtained from patient records and telephone conversation.

Results: The cohort considered totalled 107 revision THAs, 93 using a 36 mm head and 14 using a 40 mm head. All received either highly cross-linked UHMWPE liners or metal on metal liners. The indications for revisions were recurrent instability in eight, periprosthetic fracture in 11, second stage revision in 24, fracture of the femoral stem in one and aseptic loosening in the remaining 63. At a minimum follow up of one year, information was not available for five but they did not have any record of dislocation. Out of the remaining 102 patients, dislocation occurred in 4 hips (3.9%). None of the revisions done with 40 mm head dislocated. In two of the dislocations, the initial indication for revision THA was recurrent instability and if they are excluded, the dislocation rate was 1.96%.

Discussion: Dislocation and the sequalae of recurrent instability remains a significant problem following revision THA and the existing literature varies greatly in the quoted dislocation rates. We believe that the use of 36 mm and 40 mm femoral heads in our unit has been a major factor in low (3.6%) dislocation rate following revision THA. To date there have been no problems encountered resulting from the use of highly cross-linked UHMWPE.

Introduction and aim: prosthesis displacement while attempting closed reduction of a dislocated total hip or during dislocation itself is a rare but significant complication. We have come across three cases and there are at least six case reports in the literature. The aim of our study is to conduct an in vitro biomechanical study to assess, whether application of bone cement over the shoulder of the stem confers any additional advantage in the pull out strength of the implant.

Materials and Methods: We used fourteen saw bones and cemented seven bones with a standard cementing technique and another seven bones with additional cement over the shoulder of the implant. A tensile testing machine was used to assess the pull out force needed in both groups. A comparision was done between both groups.

Results: The mean pull out force in the routine cementing technique was 2066N(S.D. 256.65) and for the group with the cement on the shoulder was 3220N(S.D. 312.22). The mean difference was 1154N. The results were analysed with two-tailed t- test, unequal variance and the difference was statistically significant with p value of 0.00045.

Conclusion: Our experiment confirms that application of the bone cement over the shoulder of the implant does give additional axial stability and should be practised routinely to reduce this complication.

Introduction: We report our experience with the ZMR Hip System (Zimmer Inc.). The system accommodates a number of femoral fixation philosophies including spline, porous and taper stem options. The tapered stem is designed to achieve a distal wedge fit and also allow bone on-growth via the corundumized titanium alloy surface. The modular mid-stem junction allows a selection of body designs to be selected providing significant intra-operative flexibility and version adjustment.

Method: This study considers 64 cases performed in 63 patients with a mean age at the time of surgery of 70 years (range 55–89) utilising the taper stem design. The indication for revision surgery was aseptic loosening in 33 patients (Paprosky types II – 12, IIIA-10, IIIB-11) 22 peri-prosthetic fractures (Vancouver types B2-15, B3-7), 8 for infection and 4 patients with instability.

Results: The cohort had a minimum three-year follow-up with a mean of 50 months (range 36–72) and clinical assessment included Oxford score and thigh pain assessment. Engh’s criteria was utilised in the radiological evaluation when considering femoral component fixation. Femoral stem subsidence and femoral bone stock were also appraised on serial follow-up radiographs.

Discussion: The survival rate at follow-up with stem revision being the end point was 100%. When re-operation for any reason and radiological loosing are considered as the end point the survival rate was 95%.

Conclusion: We conclude excellent medium term results with the use of a cementless modular taper stem in challenging femoral revision surgery.