Acetabular revision Jumbo cups are used in revision hip surgeries to allow for large bone to implant contact and stability. However, jumbo cups may also result in hip center elevation and instability. They may also protrude through anterior wall leading to ilopsoas tendinitis. The study was conducted using two methods:
265 pelvic CT scans consisting of 158 males and 107 females were converted to virtual 3-dimensional bones. The average native acetabular diameter was 52.0 mm, SD = 4.0 mm (males in 52.4 mm, SD = 2.8 mm and 46.4 mm, SD = 2.6 mm in females). Images were analyzed by custom CT analytical software (SOMA™ V.3.2)1 and over-sized reaming was simulated. Four distinct points, located in and around the acetabular margins, were used to determine the reamer sphere. Points 1, 2, 3 were located at the inferior and inferior-medial acetabular margins, and Point 4 was located superiorly and posteriorly in the acetabulum to simulate a bony defect in this location, Point 4 was placed at 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50% and 60% of the distance from the superior – posterior margin of the acetabular rim to the sciatic notch to simulate bony defects of increasing size. (Figure 1)
Retrospective chart review of patient records for all cementless acetabular revisions utilizing jumbo cups between January 1, 1998 and March 30, 2012 at UCFS (98 patients with 57 men, 41 women). Jumbo cups: ≥66 mm in males; <62 mm in females. Reaming was directed inferiorly to the level of the obturator foramen to place the inferior edge of the jumbo cup at the inferior acetabulum. To determine the vertical position of the hip center, a circle was first made around both the jumbo and the contralateral acetabular surfaces using Phillips iSite PACS software. The center of this circle was assumed to correspond to the “hip center”. The height of the hip center was estimated by measuring the height of a perpendicular line arising from the interteardrop line (TL) and ending at the hip centerIntroduction:
Methods:
The femoral head/stem taper modular junction has several advantages; it also has the potential to result in fretting [1]. Stability of the taper junction is critical in reducing the risk associated with fretting. The purpose of this test was to measure the strength of various commercially available head-stem taper combinations under torsional loads to determine the effect of taper geometry and material on the strength of this taper junction. CoCr femoral heads were tested with trunnions that were machined with both a large and small taper geometry, replicating commercially available stem taper designs, V40 (small) and C (large) (Table-1, Stryker Orthopaedics, NJ). The femoral heads were assembled onto the trunnions with a 2 kN axial force. A multi-axis test frame (MTS Corp, MN) was used to test the head-trunnion combination by dynamically loading with a torque of ± 5Nm and a constant axial load of 2450N for 1000 cycles at 1.5 Hz (Figure 1). Samples were submerged in 25% diluted Alpha Calf Fraction Serum (Hyclone, UT). Upon completion of the dynamic test, a static torque to failure test was performed where the axial force of 2450N was maintained and the trunnion was rotated to 40° at a rate of 3°/sec. The torque required to rotate the trunnion by 1° was determined for each specimen. Also, the torsional resistance, defined as change in torque/change in angle in the linear region of the torque-angular displacement data curve, was calculated for all the specimens. A limitation associated with the static test was that at 1° rotation it was difficult to differentiate between rotation of the trunnion inside the femoral head and physical twisting of the trunnion. Specimen groups were compared with a single-factor ANOVA test and a Tukey post hoc test at 95% confidence level.Introduction
Methods and Materials
