Schatzker V & VI tibial plateau fractures are serious life-changing injuries often resulting in significant complications including post-traumatic arthritis. Reported incidence of secondary TKA following ORIF of all tibial plateau fractures is 7.3% and 13% for Schatzker V & VI tibial. This study reports a 15-year single centre experience of CEF of Schatzker V & VI fractures including PROMs and incidence of secondary TKA. This study was approved by the local Institutional board. All patients from 2007 – 2022 with Schatzker V or VI fractures treated with CEF were identified from a departmental limb reconstruction registry and included in this retrospective study. Patients’ demographics were collected from electronic institutional patient system. Further data was collected for secondary intervention, adverse events, and alignment at discharge. All deceased patients at the time of the study were excluded. Each participant completed a questionnaire about secondary intervention, EQ-5D-3L and Oxford Knee Score (OKS).Introduction
Materials & Methods
Circular external frames (CEF) are commonly used for a wide variety of indications, often when other devices are not appropriate. Circular frames are particularly associated with pin-site infection (PSI). Currently there is a gap in the available literature surrounding the risk of frame use with in-situ prosthetic joints. This retrospective study investigated the incidence of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in a series of patients with in-situ arthroplasties treated with CEF. From a departmental database of 1052 frames performed from March 2007-March 2023, the outcomes of 34 patients (40 frames) with in-situ arthroplasties at the time of CEF were reviewed (mean follow-up 70 months). Patient identification was by review of all local and regional imaging. The primary outcome was development of PJI during or following CEF and subsequent need for surgical intervention. Secondary outcomes were development of superficial pin site or deep bone infection (without PJI).Introduction
Materials & Methods
Frame configuration for the management of complex tibial fractures is highly variable and is dependent not only on fracture pattern and soft tissue condition but also surgeon preference. The optimal number of rings to use when designing a frame remains uncertain. Traditionally, larger, stiffer constructs with multiple rings per segment were thought to offer optimal conditions for bone healing, however, the concept of reverse dynamisation questions this approach. We compared clinical outcomes in 302 consecutive patients with tibial fractures treated in our unit with either a two-ring circular frame or a three-or-more-ring (3+) frame. The primary outcome measure was time spent in frame. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of malunion and the need for further surgical procedures to achieve bone union. The groups were evenly matched for age, co-morbidities, energy of injury mechanism, fracture classification, post-treatment alignment and presence of an open fracture.Introduction
Materials & Methods
The purpose of this study is to describe the use of intramedullary distraction coupled with an additional osteotomy to achieve union with simultaneous deformity correction and lengthening in femoral non-union. Femoral non-union is a difficult problem often associated with shortening, angulation, and mal-rotation. We report the use of an intramedullary distraction device, with additional osteotomy, to achieve union, restore femoral length and alignment. Simple distraction in femoral non-union is often ineffective, possibly because the non-union site is relatively avascular. Osteotomy is known to increase blood flow and, with lengthening, promote union through distraction histiogenesis. 7 patients with posttraumatic diaphyseal femoral non-union with shortening were studied. Pre-operative planning included long leg standing views, with CT to measure mal-rotation. 6 patients were treated with the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor (ISKD) with an osteotomy distant from non-union site within the parameters required for the device. One patient underwent distraction without osteotomy. Patients were followed to union. Complications and adjuvant interventions were recorded. All 7 patients with femoral non-union treated with ISKD were included and followed up. Patients treated with osteotomy united at average of 9 months with satisfactory deformity correction and lengthening. However patient who underwent pure distraction failed to unite. Complications included failure to lengthen, requiring manipulation, and delayed consolidation of regenerate requiring bone graft. The procedure was well tolerated The initial results of the management of femoral non-union with deformity by intramedullary distraction coupled with osteotomy are encouraging. Complications were minor and readily manageable. We believe there is an important role for this method in the management of femoral non-unions associated with deformity and length discrepancy.
Limb lengthening with external fixators has many complications, like pin track infection, joint stiffness, severe pain and stress fracture after removal of external fixator. Prolonged period in external fixator interferes with rehabilitation and activities of daily living. We describe our results with ISKD (intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor) system, an internal limb lengthening device, activated with rotations of 3 degrees. In this retrospective cohort we performed lengthening with the use of ISKD in 12 patients from March 2006 to date. Ten patients were included in this study as two patients had not completed the stage of consolidation. There were 7 male and 3 female patients. Their average age was 44 years (range 23–63). The mean follow up period was 16 months (range 12–24 months). Two patients had tibial lengthening and eight patients had femoral lengthening. The average lengthening desired was 42.5 mm (range 2.5 mm–75 mm). The average lengthening achieved was 38 mm. Mean hospital stay was 7 days (range 5–11 days). The distraction index was 1.2 mm/day. The average time to full weight bearing was 6 months (range 4 to 10 months). Mean healing time was 10.25 months. The mean healing index was 90.7 days/cm. If we remove two patients who took long time to heal, the mean healing index drops to 61 days/cm. Two patients needed bone grafting at the distraction site. None of the patients had infection, non-union of the distraction site or breakage of the nail. None of the patients had joint stiffness. All patients were completely satisfied with the treatment and had excellent functional results. We conclude that the low rate of complications, higher patient acceptability and avoidance of external fixation make ISKD a very attractive option for limb lengthening.
