The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results after arthroscopic reconstruction of isolated SSP lesions. Does double row repair in smaller lesions lead to better results and a lower retear rate? 80 patients with an isolated full thickness SSP tear were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (27 men, 13 Frauen, average age 57 y.) was repaired using a single row technique with 2 anchors (Mitek Fastin) with arthroscopic Mason-Allen stiches. Group 2 was repaired using a double row technique using 1 medial anchor (Mitek Fastin) and 2 lateral anchors (Versalok). PreOP an ultrasound and MRI was obtained as well as standard x-rays (a.p., outlet-view, transaxial). Included to this study were only patients matching the following criteria: intraoperative cartilage lesions ≤ Outerbridge Grade2, fatty degeneration ≤ Goutallier Grade 2, ap extent of the tear < 2,5 cm. Prospective follow up after 6, 12 and 24 months using UCLA and Constant Score as well as MRI at last follow up.Aim
Method
Juxtafacet cysts of the spine can cause radicular pain, neurological symptoms and are often associated with spinal degeneration. The mainstay of treatment of juxtafacet cysts is surgical resection with laminotomy and resection of the cyst. Other methods, including epidural steroid and facet injections are mostly temporarily effective. The aim of this study is the sufficient decompression with reduced traumatization and destabilization with the full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal technique. 60 patients with unilateral, single-level juxtafacet cysts were included in this study. 30 Patients (group 1) were operated in full-endoscopic technique (22 interlaminar, 8 trans-/extraforaminal) and 30 Patients (group 2) with conventional microscopic-assisted technique. The full-endoscopic operation was performed with 6.9-mm endoscopes with 4.1-mm intra-endoscopic working canal. The follow-up was 18 months. 27 (91%) patients were followed. Additionally to general parameters validated scores were used.Objectives
Methods
32 patients in the tenodesis group were satisfied with the result and would do surgery again compared to 25 in the tenotomy group, complaining about the visual deformity. There was no statistical difference in score result between the tenodesis or tenotomy group.
The patients were divided in two groups: In the first group with 31 patients we performed a capsule-labrum refixation with Fastak-anchors. In the second group (27 patients), we performed additionally a capsular shrinkage of the antero-inferior capsule with the Hol-Yag-laser. The re-examination was done in a postoperative time of 6, 12 and 24 months.
Operation-conditioned complications did not occur. 3 postoperativ reluxations were seen in each group. 22 patients of the group 1 and 19 patients of the group 2 indicated to be content with the postoperative result. The Constant Score rose in the group 1 from 46 (37–59) praeoperativ to 88 (67–100) postOP. In the group 2 the Constant Score of 42 (33–61) rose to 86 (64–100) postOP.
The anatomical reconstruction of the capsule-labrum-complex seems to be the crucial component in the arthroscopic stabilisation regarding to the postoperative results.