header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 9 - 9
1 Feb 2014
Halai M Gupta S Gilmour A Bharadwaj R Khan A Holt G
Full Access

Leg length discrepancy (LLD) can adversely affect functional outcome and patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty. We describe a novel intraoperative technique for femoral component insertion.

We aimed to determine if this technique resulted in the desired femoral placement, as templated, and if this was associated with a reduced LLD.

A series of fifty consecutive primary total hip replacements were studied. Preoperative digital templating was performed on standardised PA radiographs of the hips by the senior surgeon. The preoperative LLD was calculated and the distance from the superior tip of the greater trochanter to the predicted shoulder of the stem was calculated (GT-S). Intraoperatively, this length was marked on the rasp handle and the stem inserted to the predetermined level by the surgeon. This level corresponded to the tip of the greater trochanter and formed a continuous line to the mark on the rasp handle. Three independent blinded observers measured the GT-S on the postoperative radiographs. We assessed the relationship between the senior author's GT-S (preoperative) and the observers' GT-S (postoperative) using a Person correlation. The observers also measured the preoperative and postoperative LLD, and the inter-observer variability was calculated as the intra-class correlation coefficient.

There was a strong correlation of preoperative and postoperative GT-S (R=0.87), suggesting that the stem was inserted as planned. The mean preoperative and postoperative LLD were −4.3 mm (−21.4–4) and −0.9 mm (−9.8–8.6), respectively (p<0.001).

This technique consistently minimised LLD in this series. This technique is quick, non-invasive and does not require supplementary equipment.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Feb 2013
Baird E Macdonald D Gilmour A Kumar C
Full Access

We reviewed the outcome of Agility total ankle replacements carried out in our institution between 2002 and 2006.

Follow-up consisted of clinical and radiological review pre-operatively, at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months, and annually until 10 years post-op. Clinical review included the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score, satisfaction and pain scores.

30 arthroplasties were performed in 30 consecutive patients. Pre-operative diagnosis was rheumatoid arthritis (16), primary osteoarthritis (12) and post-traumatic osteoarthritis (2). After a mean follow up of 6.2 years (1.4–10.1), 4 patients had died, and 20 out of the remaining 24 were available for follow-up. Complications included lateral malleoli fracture (3), superficial peroneal nerve injury (2), one early death, unrelated to the surgical procedure, delayed syndesmotic union (1), non-union (6) and deep infection (2), of which one underwent removal of the implant; the other receives long-term oral antibiotics. AOFAS scores improved from mean 40.4 pre-op to 83.5 post-op (p<0.001). Radiological assessment revealed 25 (93%) patients had lucency in at least one zone in the AP radiograph.

We found a relatively high level of re-surgery and complications following Agility total ankle replacement. A 7% revision rate is much higher than would be tolerated in knee or hip arthroplasty, but compares favourably to other studies of TAR. Despite radiological loosening, and the high rate of re-surgery and complications; patients are generally satisfied with the procedure, reporting lower levels of pain and improved function. Overall, we feel that the Agility ankle is an acceptable alternative to arthrodesis, however patients should be warned of the risk of re-surgery