Abstract
We reviewed the outcome of Agility total ankle replacements carried out in our institution between 2002 and 2006.
Follow-up consisted of clinical and radiological review pre-operatively, at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months, and annually until 10 years post-op. Clinical review included the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score, satisfaction and pain scores.
30 arthroplasties were performed in 30 consecutive patients. Pre-operative diagnosis was rheumatoid arthritis (16), primary osteoarthritis (12) and post-traumatic osteoarthritis (2). After a mean follow up of 6.2 years (1.4–10.1), 4 patients had died, and 20 out of the remaining 24 were available for follow-up. Complications included lateral malleoli fracture (3), superficial peroneal nerve injury (2), one early death, unrelated to the surgical procedure, delayed syndesmotic union (1), non-union (6) and deep infection (2), of which one underwent removal of the implant; the other receives long-term oral antibiotics. AOFAS scores improved from mean 40.4 pre-op to 83.5 post-op (p<0.001). Radiological assessment revealed 25 (93%) patients had lucency in at least one zone in the AP radiograph.
We found a relatively high level of re-surgery and complications following Agility total ankle replacement. A 7% revision rate is much higher than would be tolerated in knee or hip arthroplasty, but compares favourably to other studies of TAR. Despite radiological loosening, and the high rate of re-surgery and complications; patients are generally satisfied with the procedure, reporting lower levels of pain and improved function. Overall, we feel that the Agility ankle is an acceptable alternative to arthrodesis, however patients should be warned of the risk of re-surgery