Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of the pathologies affecting the glenohumeral joint and the rotator cuff diseases. MRI allows to highlight anatomic discontinuities of both muscles and tendons. However, MRI diagnostic accuracy has not proven to be highly sensitive in distinguishing between a partial-thickness tear and a full-thickness rotator cuff tear. The purpose of this study was to determine if MRI under axial traction can be helpful in increasing MRI sensitivity to identify partial-thickness rotator cuff tears.

The study included 10 patients (4 males and 6 females) who had clinical examination and MRI suggesting a partial-thickness rotator cuff tear. They were candidates for shoulder arthroscopy because of persistent symptoms after at least three months of conservative treatment. The patients underwent a new MRI (under axial traction: MRI-AT) with a 4-kg weight applied to the affected arm. Then the patients underwent arthroscopy to confirm the diagnosis. Patients with a suspected full-thickness rotator cuff tear were excluded from the study.

Patients’ average age was 52.4 years, and the dominant side was affected in 77.7% of the cases. Preoperative Constant-Murley Score was 57. MRI-AT showed that 3 patients were affected by a complete tear of the rotator cuff, 3 patients by a partial-thickness rotator cuff tear and 4 patients had no lesion. The analysis of data showed that: under axial traction the subacromial space increased by 0,2 mm (P value = 0,001075), the superior glenohumeral space decreased by 2.4 mm (P value = 0,07414), the inferior glenohumeral space increased by 0.3 mm (P value = 0,02942), the acromial angle decreased by 1.9° (P value = 0,0002104) and the acromion-glenohumeral angle decreased by 0.3° (P-value = 0,01974). Two experienced evaluators analyzed previous standard MRI and MRI-AT scans in a double-blinded fashion, with inter-rater evaluation of all the images and measures. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) has been utilized to assess the reliability of the measures performed by different operators. ICC always resulted in more than 0.7, showing a high concordance among values in the same group. A comparative evaluation between standard MRI and MRI-AT has been conducted to highlight possible discrepancies and this has been compared to intraoperative findings. Concordance of the values was 89% between standard MRI and MRI-AT and 100% between MRI under axial traction and intraoperative findings.

This study showed a high correlation between the diagnosis achieved with MRI-AT and the intraoperative arthroscopic findings. The use of MRI-AT in clinical practice may improve the diagnostic sensitivity of this method to detect a partial-thickness rotator cuff tear.

The risk of falls in patients undergoing orthopedic procedures is particularly significant in terms of health and socioeconomic effects. The literature analyzed closely this risk following procedures performed on the lower limb, but the implications following procedures on the upper limb remain to be investigated. Interestingly, it is not clear whether the increased risk of falling in patients undergoing shoulder surgery is due to preexisting risk factors at surgery or postoperative risk factors, such as anesthesiologic effects, opioid medications used for pain control, or brace use. Only one prospective study examined gait and fall risk in patients using a shoulder abduction brace (SAB) after shoulder surgery, revealing that the brace adversely affected gait kinematics with an increase in the risk of falls. The main purpose of the study was to investigate the influence of SAB on gait parameters in patients undergoing shoulder surgery.

Patients undergoing elective shoulder surgery (arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, and Latarjet procedure), who used a 15° SAB in the postoperative period, were included. Conversely, patients age > 65 years old, with impaired lower extremity function (e.g., fracture sequelae, dysmorphism, severe osteo-articular pathology), central and peripheral nervous system pathologies, and cardiac/respiratory/vascular insufficiency were excluded. Participants underwent kinematic analysis at four different assessment times: preoperative (T0), 24 hours after surgery (T1), 1 week after surgery (T2), and 1 week after SAB removal (T3). The tests used for kinematic assessment were the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and the 10-meter test (10MWT), both of which examine functional mobility. Agility and balance were assessed by a TUG test (transitions from sitting to standing and vice versa, walking phase, turn-around), while gait (test time, cadence, speed, and pelvic symmetry) was evaluated by the 10MWT. Gait and functional mobility parameters during 10MWT and TUG tests were assessed using the BTS G-Walk sensor (G-Sensor 2). One-way ANOVA for repeated measures was conducted to detect the effects of SAB on gait parameters and functional mobility over time. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM®SPSS statistics software version 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), with the significant level set at p<0.05.

83% of the participants had surgery on the right upper limb. A main effect of time for the time of execution (duration) (p=0.01, η2=0.148), speed (p<0.01, η2=0.136), cadence (p<0.01, η2=0.129) and propulsion-right (R) (p<0.05, η2=0.105) and left (L) (p<0.01, η2=0.155) in the 10MWT was found. In the 10MWT, the running time at T1 (9.6±1.6s) was found to be significantly longer than at T2 (9.1±1.3s, p<0.05) and at T3 (9.0±1.3s, p=0.02). Cadence at T1 (109.7±10.9steps/min) was significantly lower than at T2 (114.3 ±9.3steps/min, p<0.01) and T3 (114.3±9.3steps/min, p=0.02). Velocity at T1 (1.1±0.31m/s) was significantly lower than at T2 (1.2± 0.21m/s, p<0.05). No difference was found in the pelvis symmetry index. No significant differences were found during the TUG test except for the final rotation phase with T2 value significantly greater than T3 (1.6±0.4s vs 1.4±0.3s, p<0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between T0 and T2 and between T0 and T3 in any of the parameters analyzed. Propulsion-R was significantly higher at T3 than T1 (p<0.01), whereas propulsion-L was significantly lower at T1 than T0 (p<0.05) and significantly higher at T2 and T3 than T1 (p<0.01). Specifically, the final turning phase was significantly higher at T2 than T3 (p<0.01); no significant differences were found for the duration, sit to stand, mid-turning and stand to sit phases.

The results demonstrated that the use of the abduction brace affects functional mobility 24 hours after shoulder surgery but no effects were reported at longer term observations.