Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of the pathologies affecting the glenohumeral joint and the rotator cuff diseases. MRI allows to highlight anatomic discontinuities of both muscles and tendons. However, MRI diagnostic accuracy has not proven to be highly sensitive in distinguishing between a partial-thickness tear and a full-thickness rotator cuff tear. The purpose of this study was to determine if MRI under axial traction can be helpful in increasing MRI sensitivity to identify partial-thickness rotator cuff tears.
The study included 10 patients (4 males and 6 females) who had clinical examination and MRI suggesting a partial-thickness rotator cuff tear. They were candidates for shoulder arthroscopy because of persistent symptoms after at least three months of conservative treatment. The patients underwent a new MRI (under axial traction: MRI-AT) with a 4-kg weight applied to the affected arm. Then the patients underwent arthroscopy to confirm the diagnosis. Patients with a suspected full-thickness rotator cuff tear were excluded from the study.
Patients’ average age was 52.4 years, and the dominant side was affected in 77.7% of the cases. Preoperative Constant-Murley Score was 57. MRI-AT showed that 3 patients were affected by a complete tear of the rotator cuff, 3 patients by a partial-thickness rotator cuff tear and 4 patients had no lesion. The analysis of data showed that: under axial traction the subacromial space increased by 0,2 mm (P value = 0,001075), the superior glenohumeral space decreased by 2.4 mm (P value = 0,07414), the inferior glenohumeral space increased by 0.3 mm (P value = 0,02942), the acromial angle decreased by 1.9° (P value = 0,0002104) and the acromion-glenohumeral angle decreased by 0.3° (P-value = 0,01974). Two experienced evaluators analyzed previous standard MRI and MRI-AT scans in a double-blinded fashion, with inter-rater evaluation of all the images and measures. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) has been utilized to assess the reliability of the measures performed by different operators. ICC always resulted in more than 0.7, showing a high concordance among values in the same group. A comparative evaluation between standard MRI and MRI-AT has been conducted to highlight possible discrepancies and this has been compared to intraoperative findings. Concordance of the values was 89% between standard MRI and MRI-AT and 100% between MRI under axial traction and intraoperative findings.
This study showed a high correlation between the diagnosis achieved with MRI-AT and the intraoperative arthroscopic findings. The use of MRI-AT in clinical practice may improve the diagnostic sensitivity of this method to detect a partial-thickness rotator cuff tear.
