Thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) arthritis is a common and debilitating condition. The mainstay of surgical management is Trapeziectomy. Concerns about possible functional implications of collapse of the metacarpal into the arthroplasty space as well as the potential for scaphometacarpal led to the development of techniques to try and prevent this. The purpose of this study was to investigate if there were any significant differences in the long-term outcomes of patients who participated in a randomized trial of trapeziectomy alone compared with trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI).

Sixty-five patients participated in our original trial, the 1 year findings of which were published in 2007. These patients were invited for a follow-up visit at a mean of 17 years (range 15–20) postoperatively. Twenty-eight patients attended, who had 34 operations, 14 trapeziectomy alone and 20 with LRTI. Patients were asked to complete a visual analogue scale (VAS) for satisfaction with the outcome of their procedure, rated on a scale from 0 (most dissatisfied) to 100 (most satisfied). They also completed the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (QuickDASH) at their appointment. They underwent a functional assessment with a hand therapist and had a radiograph of the thumb.

There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of satisfaction with surgery or functional outcomes, with most measurements showing minimal or no differences in means between the two groups. There was no difference in the space between the metacarpal and scaphoid on radiograph. Radial abduction was the only parameter that was significantly greater in the patients with simple trapeziectomy (median 79°) compared with trapeziectomy with LRTI (median 71°) (p = 0.04). Even at 17 years there is no significant benefit of LRTI over trapeziectomy alone for thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis.

This study aimed to determine if the adoption of collagenase treatment is economically viable.

Xiapex collagenase was trialled at Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust in 50 patients suitable for fasciectomy, with a palpable cord and up to two affected joints. Retrospective data for contracture angle pre-injection, immediately post-manipulation and at an average 6 weeks (range 2–17) clinic follow up was collected from medical notes. At follow up the post-procedure number of days required for return to activities of daily living (ADLs) and/or work were recorded, along with overall patient satisfaction rating.

Complete data was obtained for 43 patients of average age 67 (range 45–82). At follow up 88% had ≤ 20° residual contracture. Average days return to full ADLs was 9 and work was 11. Overall satisfaction was 8.6 out of 10. Xiapex patients required an average 1 hand physiotherapy appointment post-manipulation compared to 6 for fasciectomy, saving £172.20. Total cost for one treatment course, excluding physiotherapy, was £1166 for Xiapex compared to £2801 for palmar fasciectomy and £5352 for digital fasciectomy.

The level of contracture after one Xiapex treatment course permitted return of hand function in the majority of patients whose overall treatment course required less financial and hospital resources.

Outcome following wrist fractures is difficult to assess. There are many methods used to assess outcome following distal radius fractures, but may be that simply asking the patient for their level of satisfaction may be enough. We looked at 50 wrist fractures at 12 weeks post injury and compared their level of satisfaction with various respected outcome measures (Gartland and Verley, Sarmiento, Cooney, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, Hand Function Score, and Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand Score) to determine whether there was a correlation with their level of satisfaction. The aim was to determine which wrist scoring system best correlates with patient satisfaction and functional outcome and which individual variables predict a good outcome. Forty-five females and 5 males with a mean age of 66 years (range 19 to 93 years) were included in the study. Multivariate regression analysis was carried out using SPSS 17.

Patient satisfaction correlated best with the MacDermid, Watts and DASH scores. The variables in these scoring systems that best accounted for hand function were pain, ability to perform household chores or usual occupation, open packets and cut meat.

The McDermid, Watts and DASH scores provide a better measure of patient satisfaction than the Gartland and Verley, Sarmiento and Cooney scores, however they are all time consuming, complicated and may indeed not be necessary.

The four most important questions to ask in the clinic following wrist fractures are about severity of pain, ability to open packets, cut meat and perform household chores or usual occupation. This may provide a simple and more concise means of assessing outcome after distal radial fractures.

We often regard patient satisfaction as the best clinical indicator of outcome in the clinic situation. The aim of this study was to determine which wrist scoring system (Gartland and Verley, Sarmiento, Cooney, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, Hand Function Score, and Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand Score) best correlates with patient satisfaction and functional outcome and which individual variables predict a good outcome. Forty-five females and 5 males with a mean age of 66 years (range 19 to 93 years) were included in the study. Multivariate regression analysis was carried out using SPSS 13.

Patient satisfaction correlated best with the MacDermid, Watts and DASH scores. The variables in these scoring systems that best accounted for hand function were pain, ability to perform household chores, open packets, cut meat and perform the usual occupation.

The most important questions to ask in the clinic following wrist fractures are about pain, ability to perform household chores, open packets, cut meat and perform the usual occupation. The McDermid, Watts and DASH scores provide a better measure of patient satisfaction than the Gartland and Verley, Sarmiento and Cooney scores, however they are time consuming, complicated and may indeed not be necessary.

The aim of this study is to compare functional, clinical and radiological outcomes in K-wire fixation versus volar fixed-angle plate fixation in unstable, dorsally angulated distal radius fractures.

Fifty-four adult patients with an isolated closed, unilateral, unstable, distal radius fracture were recruited to participate in the study. Only dorsally displaced fractures with no articular comminution were included. Patients were randomised to have their fracture treated with either closed reduction and K-wire fixation (3 wires) or fixed-angle volar plating. Both groups were immobilised in a below elbow cast for six weeks. The wires removed in the outpatients at six weeks and both groups were referred for physiotherapy. Independent clinical review was performed at three and six months post injury. Functional scoring was performed using the DASH and Gartland and Werley scoring systems. Radiographs were evaluated by an independent orthopaedic surgeon.

Twenty-five patients were treated with a plate and twenty-nine with wires. There were no complications in the plate group. There were 9 complications in the K-wire group with 3 patients requiring a second operation (1 corrective osteotomy for malunion, 1 median nerve decompression and 1 retrieval of a migrated wire). The remaining complications included: 5 pin site infections (3 treated with early pin removal and 2 with oral antibiotics only), and 1 superficial radial nerve palsy. There were no tendon ruptures.

Both groups scored satisfactory functional results with no statistical difference. There was a statistically significant difference in the radiological outcomes with the plate group achieving better results.

We conclude that in unstable dorsally angulated distal radius fractures volar fixed-angle plate fixation is able to achieve comparable functional results to K-wire fixation with better radiological results and fewer complications. This has resulted in a change in our clinical practice.