Abstract
We often regard patient satisfaction as the best clinical indicator of outcome in the clinic situation. The aim of this study was to determine which wrist scoring system (Gartland and Verley, Sarmiento, Cooney, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, Hand Function Score, and Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand Score) best correlates with patient satisfaction and functional outcome and which individual variables predict a good outcome. Forty-five females and 5 males with a mean age of 66 years (range 19 to 93 years) were included in the study. Multivariate regression analysis was carried out using SPSS 13.
Patient satisfaction correlated best with the MacDermid, Watts and DASH scores. The variables in these scoring systems that best accounted for hand function were pain, ability to perform household chores, open packets, cut meat and perform the usual occupation.
The most important questions to ask in the clinic following wrist fractures are about pain, ability to perform household chores, open packets, cut meat and perform the usual occupation. The McDermid, Watts and DASH scores provide a better measure of patient satisfaction than the Gartland and Verley, Sarmiento and Cooney scores, however they are time consuming, complicated and may indeed not be necessary.
