Abnormal glenoid version positioning has been recognized as a cause of glenoid component failure caused by the rocking horse phenomenon. In contrast, the importance of the glenoid inclination has not been investigated. The computed tomography scans of 152 healthy shoulders were evaluated. A virtual glenoid component was positioned in 2 different planes: the maximum circular plane (MCP) and the inferior circle plane (ICP). The MCP was defined by the best fitting circle of the most superior point of the glenoid and 2 points at the lower glenoid rim. The ICP was defined by the best fitting circle on the rim of the inferior quadrants. The inclination of both planes was measured as the intersection with the scapular plane. We defined the force vector of the rotator force couple and calculated the magnitude of the shear force vector on a virtual glenoid component in both planes during glenohumeral abduction.BACKGROUND
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The balance between the subscapularis muscle and the infraspinatus/teres minor muscles, often referred to as the rotator cuff ‘force couple’, has been proposed to be critical component for glenohumeral stability. Function of these muscles can be estimated with the evaluation of muscle atrophy. In clinical practice, muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) rather than 3D muscle volume measurement have been used because it is less time consuming. Because combined anthropometric measures of length and width more accurately define the muscular volume it seems logical to study the transversal rotator cuff force couple in the transversal plane an not in the sagittal plane of the body because both parameters can be included. But is it not clear which transversal CSA has the best correlation with muscle volume To determine the optimal transversal CSA that has the best correlation with muscle volume.Background:
Purpose:
Humeral head subluxation in patients with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) and in patients with primary arthrosis has been classified by Hamada and by Walch (type B). These classifications are based on 2D evaluation techniques (AP X-ray view, axial CT images). To our knowledge no 3D evaluation of the direction of humeral head subluxation has been described To describe a reproducible 3D measuring technique to evaluate the direction of the humeral head subluxation in shoulder arthropathyIntroduction
Aim
Glenosphere disengagement can be a potential serious default in reverse shoulder arthroplasty [1]. To ensure a good clinical outcome, it is important for the surgeon to obtain an optimal assembly of the glenosphere - base plate system during surgery. However interpositioning of material particles (bone, soft tissue) between the contact surface of the glenosphere and the base plate and/or a misalignment of the glenosphere relative to the base plate can result in a suboptimal assembly of the glenosphere – base plate system [2]. This misalignment is typically caused by unwanted contact between the glenosphere and the scapula due to inadequate reaming. Both defects prevent the Morse taper from fully engaging, leading to a system configuration for which the assembly was not designed to be loaded in vivo. This study quantifies the influence these defects have on the relative movement between the glenosphere and metaglene. A biaxial test setup [Fig. 1] was developed to mechanically load the glenoidal assembly (base plate + glenosphere) of 5 Depuy® Delta Xtend 38 prostheses. The setup allows applying a cyclic loading pattern to the glenoidal component with a constant actuator load of 750 N. Each of the 5 samples was tested for 5000 cycles on 3 defects: an interpositioning of 150 µm thick (0.48 mm3) and two local underreaming defects, pushing one side of the glenosphere up 0.5 mm and 1 mm respectively, hence causing a misalignment. The relative movement was recorded using 4 Linear Variable Differential Transducers (LVDTs). The cycling frequency is 1 Hz.INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
There is no consensus on which glenoid plane should be used in total shoulder arthroplasty. Nevertheless, anatomical reconstruction of this plane is imperative for the success of a total shoulder arthroplasty. Three-dimensional reconstruction CT-scans were performed on 152 healthy shoulders. Four different glenoid planes, each determined by three surgical accessible bony reference points, are determined. The first two are triangular planes, defined by the most anterior and posterior point of the glenoid and respectively the most inferior point for the Saller's Inferior plane and the most superior point for the Saller's Superior plane. The third plane is formed by the best fitting circle of the superior tubercle and the most anterior and posterior point at the distal third of the glenoid (Circular Max). The fourth plane is formed by the best fitting circle of three points at the rim of the inferior quadrants of the glenoid (Circular Inferior). We hypothesized that the plane with normally distributed parameters, narrowest variability and best reproducibility would be the most suitable surgical glenoid plane.Background
Methods
