Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 16 - 16
1 Mar 2010
MacDonald SJ Charron K Bourne RB McCalden RW Naudie DD Rorabeck CH
Full Access

Purpose: The increasing trend of morbidly obese patients (BMI 40+) requiring joint replacement is becoming a growing concern in Total Hip Replacement (THR) surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence that BMI may have on implant longevity and clinical outcome using prospectively collected patient data.

Method: A consecutive cohort of 2864 THR’s in 2488 patients with osteoarthritis and a minimum 2 years follow-up were evaluated. Patients were divided into appropriate BMI categories; Normal and Underweight (BMI< 25, n=650), Overweight (BMI 25–29.9, n=1069), Obese (BMI 30–39.9, n=981), and Morbidly Obese (BMI 40+, n=164). Pre-operative, latest, and change in clinical outcome scores (HSS, SF12, WOMAC) were analyzed using ANOVA and Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survivorship was determined. Categorical variables such as gender and survival status were analyzed using chi-squared.

Results: Morbidly Obese patients requiring THR’s were significantly younger than all other BMI groups by 5.4±0.83 years (p< 0.0001). Gender was also significant to BMI grouping with more females being Morbidly Obese and Normal or Underweight (p< 0.0001). All pre-operative and latest HHS and WOMAC domain scores were lower for the Morbidly Obese, significantly in all preoperative score domains and latest HHS Function (p< 0.05). The change in clinical scores from pre-operative to latest was greatest in all domains for the Morbidly Obese group. K-M cumulative survival with implant revision as the endpoint at 10 years was not different between the BMI groups. Revision rates for infection for the Morbidly Obese, Obese, Overweight, and Normal were 1.3%, 0.65%, 0.3% and 0.69% respectively. Overall Revision rates for the Morbidly Obese, Obese, Overweight, and Normal were 6.7%, 5.4%, 6.9% and 5.7% respectively and were not found to be significant (p=0.496).

Conclusion: The Morbidly Obese cohort undergoing THR had significantly lower preoperative and lower postoperative clinical outcome scores than all other BMI groups but demonstrated the most significant improvement. No difference was found in the K-M survivorship although revisions and revisions for infection were not equal between the groups


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 24 - 24
1 Mar 2010
MacDonald SJ Charron K Bourne RB McCalden RW Naudie DD Rorabeck CH
Full Access

Purpose: Gender specific total knee replacement design has been a recently debated controversial topic. The purpose of this study was to investigate the survivor-ship and clinical outcomes of a large primary total knee arthroplasty cohort, specifically assessing any differences between gender groups.

Method: A consecutive cohort of 3817 patients with osteoarthritis, having undergone 5289 primary total knee replacements (3100-female, 2179-male) with a minimum of 2 years follow-up were evaluated. All surgeries were performed at the same institution by one of four surgeons. Pre-operative scores, latest scores, and change in clinical outcome scores (KSCRS, SF12, WOMAC) were compared and tested for significance using the students t-test. Kaplan Meier (K-M) survivor-ship was determined and tested for significance and categorical variables were compared using chi-squared.

Results: Men were significantly taller and heavier than women, while women had significantly higher BMI’s (p< 0.0001). While men had higher raw scores preoperatively, women demonstrated statistically greater improvement (p< 0.019) in all WOMAC domains including pain (29.87 vs. 27.30), joint stiffness (26.78 vs. 24.26), function (27.21 vs. 23.09) and total scores (28.34 vs. 25.09) There were no gender differences in improvements of the SF12 scores. Men demonstrated statistically greater improvement (p< 0.0001) in Knee Society function (22.10 vs. 18.63) and total scores (70.01 vs. 65.42), but not the Knee Society knee score (47.83 vs. 46.64, p=0.084). K-M cumulative survivorship at 10 years was 87.4±.01 for females and 82.9±.014 for males. K-M survivorship distribution was found to be significantly different between gender groups (p< 0.013, Mantel-Cox, Breslow, Tarone-Ware). Revision rates were 10.2% for males and 8.3% for females which was found to be significant by crosstabs with chi-squared (p=0.006).

Conclusion: In this cohort of patients undergoing total knee replacements, women demonstrated statistically greater implant survivorship, statistically greater improvement in WOMAC scores and less improvement in KSCR scores, leading one to question the hypothesis of an inferior clinical outcome in total knee arthroplasty that is gender based.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 238 - 239
1 May 2009
McCalden R Bourne RB Charron K Chess D MacDonald SJ Rorabeck CH McCalden R
Full Access

This study reports on the clinical and wear performance of a prospective randomised controlled trial comparing highly cross-linked (XLPE) to conventional polyethylene (PE) in total hip arthroplasty at five years minimum follow-up.

One hundred patients enrolled in a prospective randomised controlled trial received identical hybrid total hip arthroplasties with the exception of the polyethylene insert. Fifty patients received a PE liner (2.5 MRads; gamma-in-nitrogen sterilization) and fifty patients received a XLPE liner (10Mrads; gas-plasma sterilization). Clinical outcomes were determined using Harris Hip, WOMAC and SF-12 scores by an independent study nurse. Femoral head penetration rates were determined using a validated radiographic technique (Hip Analysis Suite 8.0.1.1) based on radiographs at six weeks, one year and yearly post-operatively. Linear regression analysis was performed for both the entire polyethylene groups and on each patient, where the slope represents the steady state head penetration rate (after bedding in) from one to five years follow-up.

None of the patients were lost to follow-up, however, nine patients were deceased before their five year follow-up. Two patients have been revised for loose stems. At average follow-up of 6.0 years (range 5.1–6.8 years), there were no differences in Harris Hip, WOMAC or SF-12 scores. XLPE had a significantly lower (p= 0.03) steady-state head penetration rate of 0.018 mm/year compared to 0.050 mm/year for XLPE (approximately 64% reduction). Analysis of individual patient’s head penetration rates demonstrated a similar significantly lower rate with XLPE (0.004 ± 0.067 mm/year) compared to PE (0.045 ± 0.083 mm/year). Interestingly, when examined by gender, the male PE group had a significantly higher head penetration rate (0.081 ± 0.084 mm/year) than both the male and female XLPE (−0.013 ± 0.104, 0.011 ± 0.074 mm/year, respectively).

At minimum five years follow-up, there were no clinical differences between groups. After bedding-in, there was a significant lower head penetration rate with XLPE compared to PE. Thus, mid-term follow-up appears to demonstrate a significant wear reduction (based on head penetration rates) afforded by first generation XLPE. Long-term follow-up is required to demonstrate the clinical benefit of this new material.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 223 - 223
1 May 2009
Brandt J Charron K MacDonald S Marr J Medley J Zhao L
Full Access

Attempts have been made to develop standardise guidelines for knee implant wear testing of polyethylene (PE). The current ISO-14243-3 standard recommends the use “calf serum”, without giving ranges on the specific protein constituents and characteristics. In the present study, three types of frequently used calf sera with various protein constituents (albumin, globulins) were utilised. The effect of osmolality and hyaluronic acid (HA) was also assessed. An attempt was made to identify synovial fluid (SF) characteristics that may be responsible for the boundary lubrication in the joint with the goal to develop a more clinically relevant lubricant.

Twenty samples of SF were drawn from twenty patients and analyzed. Specific protein constituents and osmolality were then compared to three calf sera used for wear testing. Test One (six million cycles (Mc)): Bovine calf serum (BCS), newborn calf serum (NCS) and alpha-calf serum (ACS) were diluted with distilled water (DW). Test two (5.5Mc): ACS with an osmolality of 312 ± 1.00 mmol/kg (closest to clinical osmolality; diluted with phosphate buffered saline, PBS) and 145 ± 2.00 mmol/kg (diluted with DW) were consecutively tested. HA was added at a concentration of 1.5g/l. Modular total knee replacements of cruciate retaining design (GUR 1050, 10mm PE insert) were used.

ACS diluted with PBS appeared to be of closest specific protein constituents and osmolality when compared to SF. The wear rate for BCS was 21.81 ± 2.48 mg/Mc, 17.05 ± 3.25 mg/Mc for NCS, and 13.44 ± 0.79 mg/Mc for ACS (p < 0.016). Decreased osmolality amplified the PE wear by a factor of 2.3 (p = 0.020). Adding HA increased the PE wear by a factor of two (p = 0.002).

There was significant difference in PE wear rates between the three calf-sera. BCS and NBC did not have clinically relevant levels of specific protein constituents. This study strongly suggests that current standards for total knee wear testing should be revised to enable more controlled wear testing under more clinically relevant conditions. It is suggested to be of particular importance when new bearing materials, such as cross-linked PE’s, are evaluated and proposed for clinical application.