Introduction

Children with early-onset scoliosis (EOS) with rib hump chest-wall distortion or fused/absent ribs have thoracic insufficiency syndrome (TIS). Commonly, respiration is adversely affected by loss of lung volume from chest-wall constriction and clinical loss of active rib cage expansion. The dynamic thoracic components of diaphragm or rib cage lung expansion during respiration is poorly characterised by radiograph or CT scan. Pulmonary function tests indicate only hemithorax performance. Dynamic lung MRI, however, can visualise both chest-wall and diaphragm motion, allowing assessment of each individual hemithorax performance, so that a dynamic classification system of the thoracic function can be developed.

Increasingly, high flexion components have been touted by the industrial manufacturers of them as the implants of choice for routine total knee replacement (TKR). An acceptable flexion arc is obtainable in most patients through various intra-operative techniques; however, the importance of obtaining high flexion—which we define as greater than 120 degrees—is unclear.

In our pilot study, a review was undertaken involving 60 of the senior authors patients who attained greater than 120 degrees of flexion after receiving an implant said to be high flexion based on the presence of both a rotating platform as well as a conforming cam-and-post third condylar space.

Despite the achievement of both high flexion and impressive patient satisfaction, no functional benefits were observed—an observation that is supported in the current literature. We will explore possible reasons for this discord and note that most patients did not express the desire to regularly perform high flexion activities such as kneeling, squatting and stooping on a daily basis. Our results and evaluation of the literature lead us to question the importance placed upon the achievement of the maximum possible post-operative flexion arc as well as the importance placed in the ability to perform high flexion activities.

This, in turn, calls into question the validity of many of the currently accepted outcomes measures used to post-operatively evaluate total knee replacements.

Prevalence of rotator cuff tears increases with advancing age (Ellman et al). In spite of proximal humeral fractures being common in the elderly, the influence of a coexistent rotator cuff tear on outcome has, to our knowledge, not been previously investigated. This study prospectively assessed whether the presence of a rotator cuff tear in association with a proximal humeral fracture influences functional prognosis.

85 patients treated conservatively for proximal humeral fractures were evaluated prospectively with Ultrasonography to determine the status of the rotator cuff. Every patient was managed by immobilisation of the arm in a sling for two weeks followed by a course of physiotherapy based on the Neer regime. Functional outcome was measured using the Constant shoulder score and the Oxford shoulder score, at 3-months and 12-months post injury.

Sixty-six of the 85 patients were female. The fractures were equally distributed for hand dominance. There were 27 patients with an undisplaced fracture, 34 patients with Neer's Type II fracture and 24 patients with Neer's Type III and IV fracture. There were 43 patients with full thickness cuff tears and 42 patients with no cuff tear or a partial thickness tear. Full thickness cuff tears were much more frequent in the over 60 year age group, which is consistent with the known increased incidence of cuff tears with increasing age.

The outcome scores at 3 and 12 months showed no statistically significant difference for either the Constant score or the Oxford score with regards to cuff integrity. Analysis of these scores showed no correlation between presence or absence of a full thickness cuff tear and shoulder function

The results of this study indicate that rotator cuff integrity is not a predictor of shoulder function at 12 months following proximal humeral fracture, as measured by outcome scores. This suggests that there is therefore no clinical indication for routine imaging of the rotator cuff in patients for whom conservative management is the preferred treatment option.

Purpose: To compare the reoperation rates of three commonly used forms of fixation for distal femur fractures.

Method: 89 patients treated between 2002 and 2006 were retrospectively reviewed (mean follow up 28 months).. 40 fractures were treated with an intramedullary nail (IMN), 34 with the LISS internal fixator and 16 with a DCS construct. Patients were reviewed clinically and radiographically. The primary treatment outcome was the rate of secondary surgical intervention; secondary outcomes included radiographic alignment and clinical outcome measures (LEM and SF-36).

Results: Reoperation: Reoperation rate for the DCS group was 12.5%, compared to 17.5 % in the IMN group and 44 % in the LISS group. Failure rates were the same when only AO type C fractures were considered. Most concerning in the LISS group was the rate of failure in distal short oblique type A fractures, in which catastrophic failure was observed in 4 of 9 patients. Alignment was similar comparing all three groups; the average radiographic distal femoral articular angle (DFAA) of was 10 degrees valgus in the DCS group, compared to 8 degrees in the IMN group and the LISS patients.

Conclusion: Reoperation rate was highest in this study when the LISS fixator was used for distal short oblique fractures of the femur. These fractures may benefit from fixation which achieves direct interfragmentary compression, such as an intramedullary device or compression plating.

Background: Prevalence of rotator cuff tears increases with advancing age (Ellman et al). In spite of proximal humeral fractures being common in the elderly, the influence of a coexistent rotator cuff tear on outcome has, to our knowledge, not been previously investigated.

Aim: This study assess whether the presence of a rotator cuff tear in association with a proximal humeral fracture influences prognosis.

Methods: 85 patients treated conservatively for proximal humeral fractures were evaluated prospectively with Ultrasonography to determine the status of the rotator cuff. Every patient was managed by immobilisation of the arm in a sling for three weeks followed by a course of physiotherapy based on the Neer regime. Functional outcome was measured using the Constant shoulder score and the Oxford shoulder score, at 3-months and 12-months post injury.

Results: Sixty-Six of the 85 patients were female. The fractures were equally distributed for hand dominance. There were 27 patients with an undisplaced fracture, 34 patients with Neer’s Type II fracture and 24 patients with Neer’s Type III and IV fracture. There were 43 patients with full thickness cuff tears and 42 patients with no cuff tear or a partial thickness tear. Full thickness cuff tears were much more frequent in the over 60 year age group, which is consistent with the known increased incidence of cuff tears with increasing age.

The outcome scores at 3 and 12 months showed no statistically significant difference for either the Constant score or the Oxford score with regards to cuff integrity. Analysis of these scores showed no correlation between presence or absence of a full thickness cuff tear and shoulder function

Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that rotator cuff integrity is not a predictor of shoulder function at 12 months following proximal humeral fracture, as measured by outcome scores. This suggests that there is therefore no clinical indication for routine imaging of the rotator cuff in patients for whom conservative management is the preferred treatment option.