Many orthopaedic patients admitted to hospital who require urgent surgery are also on Warfarin. Patients with an INR>2 have an increased risk of bleeding complications during surgery; however delay to surgery due to a high INR has both clinical and financial implications. This audit evaluates whether the appropriate management for correction of INR is employed as per local guidelines and, if not, whether this results in significant delay to operative treatment. A retrospective and prospective audit was performed analysing all Orthopaedic trauma admissions admitted to University Hospital Aintree in a 5 month period. Only those solely on warfarin, who were not acutely bleeding and required surgery in <24 hours were included.Background and Aims
Methods
We aimed to retrospectively identify risk factors for delayed / non-union for first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion. Case notes and radiograph analysis was performed for operations between April 2014 and April 2016 with at least 3 months post-operative follow up. Union was defined as bridging bone across the fusion site on AP and lateral radiographic views with no movement or pain at the MTPJ on examination. If union was not certain, CT scans were performed. All patients operations were performed/supervised by one of three consultant foot surgeons. Surgery was performed through a dorsal approach using the Anchorage compression plate. Blinded pre-operative AP radiographs were analysed for the presence of a severe hallux valgus angle equal or above 40 degrees. Measurement intra-observer reliability was acceptable (95%CI:1.6–2.3 degrees). Smoking and medical conditions associated with non-union underwent univariate analysis for significance.Introduction
Methods
The rate of surgical site infection after elective
foot and ankle surgery is higher than that after other elective orthopaedic
procedures. Since December 2005, we have prospectively collected data on
the rate of post-operative infection for 1737 patients who have
undergone elective foot and ankle surgery. In March 2008, additional
infection control policies, focused on surgical and environmental
risk factors, were introduced in our department. We saw a 50% reduction in the rate of surgical site infection
after the introduction of these measures. We are, however, aware
that the observed decrease may not be entirely attributable to these
measures alone given the number of factors that predispose to post-operative
wound infection. Cite this article:
Our Trust's prophylactic antibiotic regime for elective hip and knee replacements recently changed, following the publication of Department of Health guidelines aimed at reducing the incidence of Clostridium Difficile associated diarrhoea (CDAD). We aimed to assess whether this change has reduced the incidence of post-operative CDAD. We reviewed all primary and revision total hip and knee replacements performed in Gloucestershire Royal Hospital between April 2007 and March 2010. Up to August 2008, patients received prophylaxis with cefuroxime (Group A). This subsequently changed to flucloxacillin and gentamicin (Group B). All patients who developed CDAD within one month of surgery were identified and their case-notes were reviewed for the presence of CDAD risk factors, such as concomitant use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. 3117 patients were included and 15 developed CDAD (0.48%); 12 patients (0.77%) from Group A and 3 from Group B (0.19%), representing a four-fold decrease. Analysis of a 2×2 contingency table with Fisher's exact test showed that the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.0347). Case-note analysis revealed that 8/12 patients in Group A and 1/3 patients in Group B had other risk factors for developing CDAD. Excluding these patients, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P=0.218). CDAD is exceedingly rare following total joint replacement surgery, especially when the only antibiotics given are prophylactic. Our figures are in line with a general decline in CDAD nationally from 2007. This decline is most likely due to multiple factors, such as hand-washing, barrier nursing and restrictive antibiotic policies. The effect of the change in prophylaxis is therefore difficult to quantify. Choice of prophylactic antibiotics should be based upon their efficacy alone, not their potential to reduce CDAD.
1737 elective foot and ankle cases were prospectively audited from Dec 2005 to end June 2010. All cases were brought back to a specialist nurse dressing clinic between 10 and 17 days post op. Data was collected at the dressing clinic with a standardised proforma on the type of surgery, the state of the wound and any additional management required. Those patients with a pre-existing infection were excluded. Of the 1737 cases 201 (11.6%) had a minor wound problems such as excessive post op bleeding into the dressings, suture problems, early removal of K wires, delayed wound healing and minor infection. 42 patients required antibiotics (2.4%) 8 patients had a deep wound infection (0.5%) requiring intravenous antibiotics and or further surgery. There were 1185 forefoot procedures 36 of which developed an infection (3%), overall infections of the mid/hindfoot was 6 (1%). Practice has changed as a result of the audit (reviewed annually). We have changed our closure techniques (reducing suture problems). For the past 2 years all of our elective foot and ankle patients now go to an ultra clean ward (Joint Replacement Unit) and we have shown a reduction in infection rates by over 50% since. Our infection rate before the JRU was 3.3% with 0.7% deep infection rate (818 procedures) and after the introduction of the JRU our infection rate has ped to 1.6% superficial and 0.3% deep infection p<.001. This large series prospective study sets a benchmark for infection rates in elective foot and ankle surgery. It also highlights the benefit of a dedicated orthopaedic elective unit with rigorous infection control policy and the need to regularly review our results.
It has been shown that a cognitive function (CF) loss can occur after hip or knee arthroplasty procedures, with an incidence of 40 to 70%. The pathogenesis remains unclear but studies suggest some form of brain emboli; although both trans-cranial doppler and trans-oesophageal doppler have both shown emboli per-operatively a correlation has never been shown with CF loss post-operatively. In contrast, in the cardiothoracic literature an embolic cause is widely accepted for detectable post-operative CF drop. The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether MRI could show evidence of embolic phenomena in patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty. Twenty-five patients presenting for hip or knee arthroplasty procedures were consented for this study. Brain MRI scans and MR angiograms were performed 1 week pre-operatively and within 1 week post-operatively using a Phillips 1.5Tesla MRI unit. All scans recorded were independently reviewed by 2 radiologists. A series of tests to examine several modes of cognitive function were carried out by a clinical psychologist pre-operatively, and at 1 week post-operatively. The CF tests showed a clinically significant drop following surgery in 64% of cases – this is in keeping with other recently published data. None of the post-operative scans or angiograms showed overt evidence of new lesions. Three Scans had equivocal tiny brainstem hypodensities on a single slice with no correlating abnormality on diffusion images to support the presence of new ischaemia. We conclude that either the aetiology of post-operative CF drop following arthroplasty is not embolic in nature, or that with current technology MRI brain scans even with angiograms are not sensitive enough to show the corresponding abnormality. With currently available equipment there appears to be no benefit from using MRI as a tool to evaluate post-operative CF loss in this group of patients.
Scarf osteotomy is a commonly performed method of hallux valgus correction. Release of deforming lateral soft tissue structures is an integral part of this correction. The aim of this study was to determine if there was any difference in the correction achieved by dorsal and transarticular releases as part of a scarf osteotomy. This radiological study was performed at a single institution. One surgeon utilised the dorsal first web approach for the distal soft tissue release and one the transarticular approach. There were 23 patients in each group. The same post-operative regime was used on both sets of patients. Data was collected on hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and AFS sesamoid scoring. The pre-operative deformity as measured by hallux valgus angle and intermetatarsal angle where similar for both groups (p= 0.25, 0.79 respectively) with a significant difference in severity of AFS scoring in the dorsal group (p <
0.001). Patients who underwent a dorsal approach release had a mean improvement in IMA of 5.46 degrees compared to 3.86 in the transarticular group. The HVA improved by 17.92 degrees in the dorsal group compared to 8.08 in the transarticular group. Both these results were statistically significant (p= <
0.01,<
0.002 respectively). There was a statistically significant difference in number of patients returning to within normal limits of the HVA (p= <
0.05); 18 patients returned to a normal hallux valgus angle after undergoing the dorsal approach compared to 9 patients in the transarticular group. Our study shows that when performing a distal soft tissue release in conjunction with a scarf osteotomy for correction of hallux valgus, a dorsal first web approach is significantly better at correcting the HVA as compared to a transarticular approach. We would, therefore, recommend the use of a dorsal approach when performing this surgery.
Cognitive dysfunction has been well documented following total knee replacement. Possible causes that have been postulated include cerebral emboli, post-operative complications and pain. The aim of this study is to compare cognitive decline in patients undergoing conventional total knee replacement (TKR), navigated total knee replacement and total hip replacement (THR). We prospectively analysed 75 patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty. Group 1 consisted of 25 conventional TKR’s, group 2 consisted of 25 navigated TKR’s and group 3 consisted of 25 THR’s. Cognitive function was assessed by 11 validated neuropsychological tests preoperatively, at 1 week post-operatively and at 6 months post-operatively. Testing was carried out by a clinical psychologist. At day 6 post-operatively 55% of group 1, 83% of group 2 and 61% of group 3 patients had a significant cognitive decline. Group 2 had a significantly greater cognitive decline at day 6 compared to the other 2 groups. At 6 months significant cognitive decline was found in all 3 groups to 21%, 16% and 34% respectively. Group 2 demonstrated the greatest improvement in cognition from day 6 to 6 months post-operatively Significant cognitive decline occurs in two-thirds (66%) of all patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty at day 6 and remains significant in a quarter (25%) of patients at 6 months. There was no significant difference in cognitive decline in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty.
In addition to the above quantitative changes, qualitative assessment of the data showed an alteration in the loading pattern with reduced push off forces. However, eighteen of the twenty feet showed no alteration in the pattern of pressure distribution.
whether ankle replacements were capable of maintaining a normal gait and whether ankle replacements were superior to arthrodeses in maintaining a normal gait pattern.
There were a mixture of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. We also looked at the ‘normal’ side of the patients with unilateral surgery.
There is increasing evidence that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can adversely affect bone repair. We have, therefore, studied the These results suggest that care should be taken when administering NSAIDs to patients with existing skeletal problems and that NO-NSAIDs may be safer.