Abstract
1737 elective foot and ankle cases were prospectively audited from Dec 2005 to end June 2010. All cases were brought back to a specialist nurse dressing clinic between 10 and 17 days post op. Data was collected at the dressing clinic with a standardised proforma on the type of surgery, the state of the wound and any additional management required. Those patients with a pre-existing infection were excluded.
Of the 1737 cases 201 (11.6%) had a minor wound problems such as excessive post op bleeding into the dressings, suture problems, early removal of K wires, delayed wound healing and minor infection. 42 patients required antibiotics (2.4%) 8 patients had a deep wound infection (0.5%) requiring intravenous antibiotics and or further surgery.
There were 1185 forefoot procedures 36 of which developed an infection (3%), overall infections of the mid/hindfoot was 6 (1%).
Practice has changed as a result of the audit (reviewed annually). We have changed our closure techniques (reducing suture problems). For the past 2 years all of our elective foot and ankle patients now go to an ultra clean ward (Joint Replacement Unit) and we have shown a reduction in infection rates by over 50% since. Our infection rate before the JRU was 3.3% with 0.7% deep infection rate (818 procedures) and after the introduction of the JRU our infection rate has ped to 1.6% superficial and 0.3% deep infection p<.001.
This large series prospective study sets a benchmark for infection rates in elective foot and ankle surgery. It also highlights the benefit of a dedicated orthopaedic elective unit with rigorous infection control policy and the need to regularly review our results.
