Outcome following wrist fractures is difficult to assess. There are many methods used to assess outcome following distal radius fractures, but may be that simply asking the patient for their level of satisfaction may be enough. We looked at 50 wrist fractures at 12 weeks post injury and compared their level of satisfaction with various respected outcome measures (Gartland and Verley, Sarmiento, Cooney, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, Hand Function Score, and Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand Score) to determine whether there was a correlation with their level of satisfaction. The aim was to determine which wrist scoring system best correlates with patient satisfaction and functional outcome and which individual variables predict a good outcome. Forty-five females and 5 males with a mean age of 66 years (range 19 to 93 years) were included in the study. Multivariate regression analysis was carried out using SPSS 17.

Patient satisfaction correlated best with the MacDermid, Watts and DASH scores. The variables in these scoring systems that best accounted for hand function were pain, ability to perform household chores or usual occupation, open packets and cut meat.

The McDermid, Watts and DASH scores provide a better measure of patient satisfaction than the Gartland and Verley, Sarmiento and Cooney scores, however they are all time consuming, complicated and may indeed not be necessary.

The four most important questions to ask in the clinic following wrist fractures are about severity of pain, ability to open packets, cut meat and perform household chores or usual occupation. This may provide a simple and more concise means of assessing outcome after distal radial fractures.

We often regard patient satisfaction as the best clinical indicator of outcome in the clinic situation. The aim of this study was to determine which wrist scoring system (Gartland and Verley, Sarmiento, Cooney, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, Hand Function Score, and Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand Score) best correlates with patient satisfaction and functional outcome and which individual variables predict a good outcome. Forty-five females and 5 males with a mean age of 66 years (range 19 to 93 years) were included in the study. Multivariate regression analysis was carried out using SPSS 13.

Patient satisfaction correlated best with the MacDermid, Watts and DASH scores. The variables in these scoring systems that best accounted for hand function were pain, ability to perform household chores, open packets, cut meat and perform the usual occupation.

The most important questions to ask in the clinic following wrist fractures are about pain, ability to perform household chores, open packets, cut meat and perform the usual occupation. The McDermid, Watts and DASH scores provide a better measure of patient satisfaction than the Gartland and Verley, Sarmiento and Cooney scores, however they are time consuming, complicated and may indeed not be necessary.

Objective

Shoulder instability is a common cause of morbidity amongst Professional Rugby Union players. This study explores whether the risk of shoulder dislocation is associated with innate shoulder laxity.

Objective: Shoulder instability is a common cause of morbidity amongst Professional Rugby Union players. This study explores whether the risk of shoulder dislocation is associated with innate shoulder laxity.

Methodology: We performed a pilot study where we validated techniques we used in the study and subsequently gained Ethics committee approval. The study was a controlled study, in which we visited all the Premiership Rugby Clubs in England. We assessed 169 professional rugby players (mean age 25.1 years, range 18–35) with no history of instability in either shoulder and 46 injured players with one shoulder with clinical shoulder instability symptoms (male, mean age 27.5 years, range 20–33) took part in this study. We assessed shoulder laxity by means of clinical evaluation, questionnaires and ultrasound. Anterior, posterior and inferior translation were measured in both shoulders for healthy players and the uninjured shoulder only for injured players.

Results: We found there is no significant difference between left (anterior: mean 2.92 mm, SD 1.15; posterior: mean 5.10 mm, SD 1.75; inferior: mean 3.08 mm, SD 1.00) and right (anterior: mean 3.07 mm, SD 1.14; posterior: mean 4.87 mm, SD 1.61; inferior: mean 2.91 mm, SD 0.99) shoulder in healthy players (P > 0.05). The comparison between the healthy shoulders (anterior: mean 3.00 mm, SD 1.15; posterior: mean 4.99 mm, SD 1.68; inferior: mean 3.00 mm, SD 1.00) from healthy players and the normal uninjured shoulder (anterior: mean 4.16 mm, SD 1.70; posterior: mean 6.16 mm, SD 3.04; inferior: mean 3.42 mm, SD 1.18) from injured players identified that players with unstable shoulders have a significantly higher shoulder translation in their normal shoulder than healthy players (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: This is the first study looking at laxity and the risk of shoulder dislocations in sportsmen involved in a high contact sport. These results support the hypothesis that rugby players with “lax” shoulders are more likely to sustain a dislocation or subluxation injury to one of these lax shoulders in their sport. We believe pre-season screening and targeted training may play a role in identifying those at risk and may decrease the incidence of dislocations.

Shoulder instability is a common cause of morbidity amongst Professional Rugby Union players. This study explores whether the risk of shoulder dislocation is associated with innate shoulder laxity. A prospective, randomised controlled study was completed in which all the Premiership Rugby Clubs in England were visited. 169 professional rugby players with no history of instability in either shoulder and 46 players with one shoulder with clinical instability symptoms were assessed. Shoulder laxity was measured by clinical evaluation, questionnaires and ultrasound. Anterior, posterior and inferior translation was measured in both shoulders for healthy players and the uninjured shoulder only for injured players. The results showed there was no significant difference between the left (anterior: mean 2.92 +/− 1.15 mm; posterior: mean 5.10 +/− 1.75 mm; inferior: mean 3.08 +/− 1.00 mm) and right (anterior: mean 3.07 +/− 1.14 mm; posterior: mean 4.87 +/− 1.61 mm; inferior: mean 2.91 +/− 0.99 mm) shoulders in healthy players (P > 0.05). The comparison between healthy shoulders (anterior: mean 3.00 +/− 1.15 mm; posterior: mean 4.99 +/− 1.68 mm; inferior: mean 3.00 +/− 1.00 mm) from healthy players and the uninjured shoulder (anterior: mean 4.16 +/− 1.70 mm; posterior: mean 6.16 +/− 3.04 mm; inferior: mean 3.42 +/− 1.18 mm) from injured players identified that players with unstable shoulders have a significantly higher shoulder translation in their normal shoulder than healthy players (P < 0.05). This is the first study looking at laxity and the risk of shoulder dislocations in sportsmen involved in a high contact sport. These results support the hypothesis that rugby players with “lax” shoulders are more likely to sustain a dislocation or subluxation injury to one of these lax shoulders in their sport.

The NHS Plan (2000) identified the need for change in the way patients are asked to give consent for surgery to make the process more explicit. A new NHS operation consent form was introduced in April 2002 following the Bristol enquiry into deaths associated with Cardiac Surgery.

Methods: We have addressed the obtaining of consent for surgery as an evidence-based exercise. The published literature has been reviewed and we have attempted to accurately quantify the success rates for surgery, complication rates and poor outcomes in order to identify what the likely benefits and risks are for our common operations –

Shoulder – Arthroscopic Sub-Acromial Decompression, Anterior stabilisation, Rotator Cuff repair, excision lateral end of clavicle and Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Evidence was therefore been categorised into 4 levels:

National & International published results

Results: We have taken the standard NHS Consent Form and modified it in a printed format to present to the patient a clearer description of the anticipated outcome from their surgery (with percentages). This evidence based consent form was evaluated in a combined prospective and retrospective survey of 60 patients who attended our pre-operative assessment clinic. We will present the results of the survey and demonstrate the standardised Consent Forms.

Conclusions: The majority of the information the patient wished to know was Level 4 evidence!

Background: The Delta Inverse Shoulder Arthroplasty, has gained considerable popularity in France and Europe for Rotator Cuff (RC) deficient patients. However complications related to surgical difficulties with insertion, mechanical loosening, and polyethylene (PE) wear are now being reported. The increasing numbers of complications are alarming.

Methods: A computerised analysis of the kinematics associated with inverse shoulder replacements has been developed. Different glenoid dome sizes and humeral cup dimensions have been tested. This has highlighted the deficiencies associated with the design of the inverse shoulder prostheses currently available on the market. Modifications of the prosthesis geometry and the inclusion of a mobile bearing have also been subjected to computer analysis and have demonstrated improved kinematics and a reduction in the risk of bone/prosthesis contact. A medium term follow-up of 9 patients with a mobile bearing Inverse shoulder design has been carried out. Compression tests have been carried out on the PE bearing to identify the risk of plastic deformity of the PE.

Results: The results of the computerised analysis and the clinical results from the first 9 patients will be reported. One patient suffered an operative complication with failure of reduction of the prosthesis which was rectified at an immediate re-operation. The early clinical results are similar to the good results obtained with the Delta prosthesis. However polyethylene bearing failure has occurred in one case, highlighting the importance of optimising the geometry of the inverse shoulder. Both Radio-Stereometric Analyses (RSA) and prospective randomised studies comparing this Inverse prosthesis with either a Cuff Tear Arthropathy (CTA) hemiarthroplasty designes (when Gleno-Humeral(GH) OA is present) or with cuff reconstruction using augmentation (when no GH OA is present) have been designed and will be discussed.

Introduction: Osteoarthritis of the thumb is the second most common site of arthritis in humans. There are numerous operations for the condition, but perhaps the commonest is trapeziectomy, which can be supplemented with a suspension procedure generally using FCR.

It was the aim of this study to determine whether there is an advantage of one procedure over the other.

Materials and methods: 60 patients with either Eaton and Littler grade III or IV arthritis of the CMCJ of their thumbs were randomised into either having a traditional trapeziectomy (with no wiring), or a trapeziectomy with FCR suspension. The surgery was performed by the senior surgeon. All patients were assessed pre- and post operatively (at 3,6 and 12 months) by a physiotherapist measuring pain on visual analogue scores doing various activities, range of movement and grip and pinch strength. X-rays were taken at the same intervals.

Results: Patient satisfaction from both operations was similar. There was no significant difference between visual analogue scores. Measurement of the gap left by the trapeziectomy was less when trapeziectomy alone was performed.

Discussion: There is no obvious difference in the results of these two surgical techniques for treating OA of thumb CMCJ. It is not necessary to perform the FCR suspension.