Degenerative, inflammatory, and posttraumatic arthritis of the ankle are the primary indications for total ankle arthroplasty Ankle arthrodesis has long been the “gold standard” for the surgical treatment Total Ankle Arthroplasty. implant survivorship has been reported to range from 70% to 98% at three to six years The combination of younger age and hindfoot arthrodesis or osteoarthritis may lead to a relative increase in failure rates after TAA Intraoperative complication include malaligment, fracture and tendon Postoperative complications include syndesmotic nonunion, wound problems, infections and component instability and lysis After TAA few difficulties mainly due to poor Talar and Tibial bone stock. It is difficult to stabilize the fusion and usually there is shortening after removal of the implant. Also there is a need for massive bone graft-allograft or autograft. In cases when there is significant bone loss there is a need for stable reconstruction and stabilization of the hindfoot. Bone grafting with structural bone graft may collapse and it has to be stabilized with screws or nail. We developed technique which included distraction of the fusion area and inserting a Titanium cylindrical spinal cage filled with bone graft. Than guide wire was inserted in through the cage under fluoroscopy and a compression screw was introduced causing compression of the fusion area against the cage gaining stabilization of the fusion area.Introduction
Methods
Hip fractures affect annually over 350,000 people in the USA and over 1.6 million worldwide. About 50% of these numbers are intertrochanteric fractures, The surgeon should be able to minimize the morbidity associated with the fracture by: recognizing the fracture pattern, choosing the appropriate fixation device, performing accurate reductions with ideal implant placement and being conscious of implant costs. In this study we assessed the ability of the orthopaedic surgeons to recognize fractures pattern, and choosing the ideal implant for the recognized fracture. We assessed 134 orthopaedic surgeons with questionnaires that assessed 14 different intertrochanteric femoral fractures. We evaluated the fractures as stable or unstable. We chose for each fracture the appropriate fixation device: either a Dynamic Hip Screw (for stable fractures) or an Intra Medullary Nail (for unstable ones), taking into consideration fracture's stability and implants’ costs. We compared the answers of the assessed surgeons to ours.Background
Methods
Mean age 74.5 (range 38–93), Partial weight bearing began 0–4 weeks post operation and Full Weight Bearing 4–8 weeks post operation. Patients were evaluated at 1,2,6,12&
24 months after the operation.
The patients were scored by modified lower extremity questionnaire with mean results 4.1 (scale of 1–5, 1-poor, 5-excellent). There were no cases of implant failure. No cases of infections. Two patients had a cut-out of the implant and two other patients had a nonunion of the fracture. Those 4 patients (5.06%) were converted to a THR. There were no cases of avascular necrosis.
This procedure offers several advantages over hemiarthroplasty, by lowering the risk of immediate complications such as prolonged anesthesia, bleeding, infection, periprosthetic fractures and dislocations. Furthermore, the use of the short TAN preserves the femoral head and the normal anatomy in active patients in order to avoid the late complications of hemiarthroplasty.
The Purpose: To compare clinical results of proximal humerus fractures following internal fixation with proximal humeral locked plate versus conservative treatment.
Mean age: 65.4±12.7 Gender: 22 females, 3 males. Age and gender were similar in both groups. Follow up was longer in the conservative group (23.8 m ±7.5) compared to the operated one (11.1 m ±8.3). All the patients were evaluated clinically using Constant’s score. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test (examination rates differences), Mann-Whitney test (examination means difference) and Spearman’s test (evaluation of the correlation coefficient between two continuous variables).
The difference could be influenced by the shorter follow–up period in the operated group.