Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Trauma

INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE OF THE FEMUR- ASSESMENT OF FRACTURE PATTERN AND CHOOSING THE APPROPRIATE FIXATION DEVICE.

European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) - 12th Congress



Abstract

Background

Hip fractures affect annually over 350,000 people in the USA and over 1.6 million worldwide. About 50% of these numbers are intertrochanteric fractures,

The surgeon should be able to minimize the morbidity associated with the fracture by: recognizing the fracture pattern, choosing the appropriate fixation device, performing accurate reductions with ideal implant placement and being conscious of implant costs. In this study we assessed the ability of the orthopaedic surgeons to recognize fractures pattern, and choosing the ideal implant for the recognized fracture.

Methods

We assessed 134 orthopaedic surgeons with questionnaires that assessed 14 different intertrochanteric femoral fractures. We evaluated the fractures as stable or unstable. We chose for each fracture the appropriate fixation device: either a Dynamic Hip Screw (for stable fractures) or an Intra Medullary Nail (for unstable ones), taking into consideration fracture's stability and implants’ costs. We compared the answers of the assessed surgeons to ours.

Results

134 orthopaedic surgeons fulfilled our questionnaires.

The average agreement among the assessed surgeons and the authors for fractures’ stability distributed as follows: 78.2% agreement for the stable fractures, 86.2% for the unstable fractures. The agreement for the appropriate fixator between both groups (authors and surgeons) distributed as follows: in choosing the dynamic hip screws for the stable fractures 79.6% agreed with our choice. When choosing the Intra Medullary Nail for the unstable fractures 72.4% of the surgeons agreed with our choice. Interestingly, surgeons that their subspecialty is orthopaedic trauma tended to use more the Intra Medullary Nails in the stable fractures compared to the other surgeons.

Conclusions

The majority of the assessed surgeons know to recognise inertrochanteric fractures’ stability and to choose the appropriate fixation device. 20% of surgeons did not agree with our choices.

Choosing an Intra Medullary Nail for the stable fracture is not a mistake, but the wrong fixation device for the unstable fracture may cause non-union, mal-union or hardware failure, and might complicate patients’ rehabilitation and cure.

We believe that a team discussion should take place for each and any case before operation, and whenever there is a doubt about fractures stability, the Iintra Medullary Nail should be chosen.