This article reviews four commonly used approaches to assess patient responsiveness to a treatment or therapy [Return To Normal (RTN), Minimal Important Difference (MID), Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), OMERACT-OARSI (OO)], and demonstrates how each of the methods can be formulated in a multi-level modelling (MLM) framework. Data from the Arthroplasty Pain Experience (APEX) cohort study was used. Patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement completed the Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) questionnaire prior to surgery and then at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. We compare baseline scores, change scores, and proportion of individuals defined as “responders” using traditional and multi-level model (MLM) approaches to patient responsiveness.Background
Methods
Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee (anteromedial gonarthrosis-AMG) is a common form of knee arthritis. In a clinical setting, knee arthritis has always been assessed by plain radiography in conjunction with pain and function assessments. Whilst this is useful for surgical decision making in bone on bone arthritis, plain radiography gives no insight to the earlier stages of disease. In a recent study 82% of patients with painful arthritis had only partial thickness joint space loss on plain radiography. These patients are managed with various surgical treatments; injection, arthroscopy, osteotomy and arthroplasty with varying results. We believe these varying results are in part due to these patients being at different stages of disease, which will respond differently to different treatments. However radiography cannot delineate these stages. We describe the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings of this partial thickness AMG as a way of understanding these earlier stages of the disease. 46 subjects with symptomatic partial thickness AMG underwent MRI assessment with dedicated 3 Tesla sequences. All joint compartments were scored for both partial and full thickness cartilage lesions, osteophytes and bone marrow lesions (BML). Both menisci were assessed for extrusion and tear. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) integrity was also assessed. Osteophytes were graded on a four point scale in the intercondylar notch and the lateral margins of the joint compartments. Scoring was performed by a consultant radiologist and clinical research fellow using a validated MRI atlas with consensus reached for disagreements. The results were tabulated and relationships of the interval data assessed with linear by linear Chi2 test and Pearson's Correlation.Introduction
Method
Anteromedial gonarthrosis is a common well described pattern of knee osteoarthritis with cartilage wear beginning in the anteromedial quadrant of the medial tibial plateau in the presence of an intact and functioning ACL. It is well known that mechanical factors such as limb alignment and meniscal integrity affect the progression of arthritis and there is some evidence that the morphology of the tibial plateau may be a risk factor in the development of this disease. The extension facet angle is the angle of the downslope of the anterior portion of the medial tibial plateau joint surface in relation to the middle portion on a sagittal view. If this is an important factor in the development of AMG there may be potential for disease modifying intervention. This study investigates if there is a significant difference in this angle as measured on MRI between a study cohort with early AMG (partial thickness cartilage damage and intact ACL) and a comparator control cohort of patients (no cartilage damage and ACL rupture). 3 Tesla MRI scans of 99 patients; 54 with partial thickness cartilage damage and 44 comparitors with no cartilage damage (acute ACL rupture) were assessed. The extension facet angle was measured (Osirix v3.6) using a validated technique on two consecutive MRI T2 sagittal slices orientated at the mid-coronal point of the medial femoral condyle. (InterClass Correlation 0.95, IntraClass Correlation 0.97, within subject variation of 1.1° and coefficient of variation 10.7%). The mean of the two extension angle values was used. The results were tabulated and analysed (R v2.9.1).Introduction
Methods
The heat produced by drills, saws and PMMA cement in the handling of bone can cause thermal necrosis. Thermal necrosis could be a factor in the formation of a fibrous tissue membrane and impaired bony ingrowth into porous prostheses. This has been proposed to lead to non-union of osteotomies and fractures, the failure of the bone-cement interface and the failure of resurfacing arthroplasty. We compared three proprietary blades (the De Soutter, the Stryker Dual Cut and the Stryker Precision) in an in-vitro setting with porcine tibiae, using thermocouples embedded in the bone below the cutting surface to measure the increases in bone temperature. There was a significant (p=0.001) difference in the change in temperature (δT) between the blade types. The mean increase in temperature was highest for the De Soutter, 2.84°C (SD: 1.83°C, range 0.48°C to 9.30°C); mean δT was 1.81°C (SD: 1.00°C, range 0.18°C to 4.85°C) for the Precision and 1.68°C (SD: 0.95°C, range 0.24°C to 5.67°C). Performing paired tests, there was no significant difference in δT between the Precision and Dual Cut blades (p=0.340), but both these blades had significantly (p=0.003 for Precision vs De Soutter, p<0.001 for Dual Cut vs De Soutter) lower values for δT than the Dual Cut.
