Previous studies have shown the potential for virtual reality (VR) immersion as a promising technique for pain and anxiety management. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of VR in the management of pain and anxiety during post-op external fixator care procedures. This study involved patients aged 5-21 years following limb lengthening/reconstruction surgery with an external fixator. Aqua VR application from the KindVR® was utilized for this study. Subjects were seen during the first four postoperative visits and assigned to a ‘VR-first’ or ‘no-VR-first’ group. Visits alternated between VR immersion and no VR immersion during care procedures. The study endpoints (pain and anxiety levels) were assessed before, during, and after procedures using the Wong-Baker Faces (FACES) and Children's Fear Scale, respectively. Proxy scores for pain and anxiety were also obtained from parents or legal guardians and providers.Introduction
Method
Patients with external fixators are at risk of pin site infection. A more objective assessment of possible pin site infection is warranted, particularly for future home-based monitoring of pin sites. The aim was to determine if thermography can detect signs of inflammation around pin sites by 1) Establishing a maximum temperature cut-off value 2) Investigating the correlation between local temperature and visual signs of inflammation 3) Adjust for anatomical location and ambient room temperature. This was a cross-sectional international multi-center study following STROBE guidelines. All patients with external ring-fixators scheduled for a visit in the out-patient clinic were eligible. Visual signs of inflammation were categorized using the Modified Gordon classification System (MGS, simplified sMGS). Thermographic imaging was done with an infrared camera (FLIR T540) and the maximum temperature within the ROI (MaxTp) was the primary outcome measure. Sample size and reliability were estimated. Cohen-Kappa, ROC-curve/AUC and Poisson regression were used for statistical analysis.Introduction
Method
The recent introduction of Chatbots has provided an interactive medium to answer patient questions. The accuracy of responses with these programs in limb lengthening and reconstruction surgery has not previously been determined. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of answers from 3 free AI chatbot platforms to 23 common questions regarding treatment for limb lengthening and reconstruction. We generated a list of 23 common questions asked by parents before their child's limb lengthening and reconstruction surgery. Each question was posed to three different AI chatbots (ChatGPT 3.5 [OpenAI], Google Bard, and Microsoft Copilot [Bing!]) by three different answer retrievers on separate computers between November 17 and November 18, 2023. Responses were only asked one time to each chatbot by each answer retriever. Nine answers (3 answer retrievers × 3 chatbots) were randomized and platform-blinded prior to rating by three orthopedic surgeons. The 4-point rating system reported by Mika et al. was used to grade all responses.Introduction
Method
