Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

CAN PIN SITE INFLAMMATION BE DETECTED WITH THERMOGRAPHIC IMAGING? A CROSS-SECTIONAL MULTICENTRE STUDY OF PATIENTS TREATED WITH EXTERNAL FIXATORS

The European Orthopaedic Research Society (EORS) 32nd Annual Meeting, Aalborg, Denmark, 18–20 September 2024.



Abstract

Introduction

Patients with external fixators are at risk of pin site infection. A more objective assessment of possible pin site infection is warranted, particularly for future home-based monitoring of pin sites. The aim was to determine if thermography can detect signs of inflammation around pin sites by 1) Establishing a maximum temperature cut-off value 2) Investigating the correlation between local temperature and visual signs of inflammation 3) Adjust for anatomical location and ambient room temperature.

Method

This was a cross-sectional international multi-center study following STROBE guidelines. All patients with external ring-fixators scheduled for a visit in the out-patient clinic were eligible. Visual signs of inflammation were categorized using the Modified Gordon classification System (MGS, simplified sMGS). Thermographic imaging was done with an infrared camera (FLIR T540) and the maximum temperature within the ROI (MaxTp) was the primary outcome measure. Sample size and reliability were estimated. Cohen-Kappa, ROC-curve/AUC and Poisson regression were used for statistical analysis.

Result

Data from 1970 pin sites were included. Inter-rater reliability of MGS was Kappa=0.79 and for MaxTp ICC=0.99 (95%CI: 0.99;0.99). Overall, a tendency of rising temperature with increasing sMGS was seen. The difference between sMGS=0 and sMGS>0 was significant. The performance of MaxTp as a screening tool to detect inflammation was reasonable with an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.65-0.76). The empirically optimal cut-off value was 34.1°C (Sensitivity=65%, Specificity=72%, Positive predictive value=23%, Negative Predictive value=94%). A 1°C increase in MaxTp increased the RR of visual signs of inflammation by a factor 1.5 (95% CI: 1.3; 1.7).

Conclusion

We found a clinical positive association between the temperature at the pin site measured with thermography and visual signs of inflammation. The empirically optimal temperature cut-off value for inflammation screening was 34.1°C. Thermography may be a promising tool for a for a future point of care technology.


Corresponding author: Marie Fridberg