Conventional fixed-bearing (FB) knee prostheses have been proved clinically successful. Rotating platform, mobile-bearing (MB) total knee replacements (TKR) have been developed to improve knee kinematics, lower contact stresses on the polyethylene tibial component, minimize constraint, and allow implant self-alignment. The purpose of this study was to characterize and compare the functional outcome of FB- and MB- TKR during gait and deep knee bends, using a motion analysis system. Two groups of five patients with a unilateral FB TKR (PFC) or MB TKR (LCS) underwent a gait analysis study. The normal contralateral limb was used as a control to compare data in the stance phase of gait. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic data were equivalent in the 2 groups. Both MB and FB TKRs gave good functional results in spite of different design rationales. No statistically significant difference was demonstrated between the two groups. However, gait and knee function after TKR was abnormal even though the patients were asymptomatic. A flexional pattern for flex-ion-extension moments at the knee during level walking was present in both types of TKR. Differences in rotational moments between the two groups were observed, with a higher internal rotational moment in the PFC group (PFC, 0.14 Nm/kg; LCS, 0.09 Nm/kg; p=0.094). A stressful weightbearing activity, such as deep knee bends, amplified the functional differences between the different prosthetic designs, indicating that knee kinematics are activity-dependent. Kinetic and kinematic differences noted between the 2 groups reflect different patterns of joint surface motion and loading, with postulated effects on long term failure of the implants through wear, mechanical failure, and loosening. Gait analysis using external skin markers has a limited role in the characterization of the joint surface motion of the prosthetic knee during ambulatory activities because of errors and assumptions inherent in the technique. However, it provides scope for the study of kinetic parameters acting on different knee prostheses during gait.
Multiple threaded pins were used in 10 hips and a cannulated screw in 2 hips. Complications include revision surgery due to loss of fixation in 3 hips and a superficial wound infection. There were no cases of avascular necrosis and chondrolysis.
Stickler’s syndrome, also called Hereditary Progressive Arthro-Ophthalmopathy, is an autosomal dominant connective tissue disorder with strong expressivity, characterised by ocular, orofacial, skeletal, cardiac, and auditory features. We describe a case of valgus slipped capital femoral epiphysis in a 13 year-old boy with Stickler’s syndrome. He presented at routine rheumatology clinic follow-up with a 1-month history of progressively worsening right hip pain, which radiated to the knee. He underwent insitu cannulated screw fixation of the right slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Joint pains are a common manifestation in Stickler’s syndrome and this might delay the diagnosis of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Valgus slipped capital femoral epiphysis is a rare entity. Obesity and the increased femoral anteversion are predisposing factors. Insitu fixation with a single cannulated screw is the treatment of choice.
We performed a prospective, randomised study on 57 patients older than 60 years of age with unstable, extra-articular fractures of the distal radius to compare the outcome of immobilisation in a cast alone with that using supplementary, percutaneous pinning. Patients treated by percutaneous wires had a statistically significant improvement in dorsal angulation (mean 7°), radial length (mean 3 mm) and radial inclination (mean 3 mm) at one year. However, there was no significant difference in functional outcome in terms of pain, range of movement, grip strength, activities of daily living and the SF-36 score except for an improved range of movement in ulnar deviation in the percutaneous wire group. One patient developed a pin-track infection which required removal of the wires at two weeks. We conclude that percutaneous pinning of unstable, extra-articular fractures of the distal radius provides only a marginal improvement in the radiological parameters compared with immobilisation in a cast alone. This does not correlate with an improved functional outcome in a low-demand, elderly population.
We assessed hyperextension of the knee and joint laxity in 169 consecutive patients who underwent an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between 2000 and 2002 and correlated this with a selected number of age- and gender-matched controls. In addition, the mechanism of injury in the majority of patients was documented. Joint laxity was present in 42.6% (72 of 169) of the patients and hyperextension of the knee in 78.7% (133 of 169). All patients with joint laxity had hyperextension of their knee. In the control group only 21.5% (14 of 65) had joint laxity and 37% (24 of 65) had hyperextension of the knee. Statistical analysis showed a significant correlation for these associations. We conclude that anterior cruciate ligament injury is more common in those with joint laxity and particularly so for those with hyperextension of the knee.
Statistical analysis showed that ACL injury was common in those with lax joints and with knee hyperextension with a p <
0.001