Introduction

Modern processing techniques in bone banking are thought to decrease the presence of allogenic material in bone. This project was performed to observe any changes in peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets in response to allografted bone used in revision hip replacement.

Introduction: Freezing and storage of fresh frozen femoral heads destined for use in revision hip arthroplasty is thought to result in graft cell death. Washing of the graft following the morsellisation process also removes a large proportion of the marrow content of the allograft. However, the immunological load of the impaction allografting process remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the immune response by observing any changes in peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets in response to allografted bone used in revision hip replacement

Methods: 87 patients were entered into this prospective study and grouped according to whether impaction allograft was used or not. Venous blood samples were collected pre-operatively and at set time intervals up to one year post-operatively. Using flow cytometry, analysis of venous blood allowed counts of the following cells: Helper T-lymphocytes, cytotoxic T-lymphocytes, memory T-lymphocytes, naïve T-lymphocytes, Natural Killer cells and B-lymphocytes.

Results: All patients had a successful outcome at one year. 50 patients with radiologically defined host-graft union were compared with 37 patients who did not receive allograft. Pre-operatively, a significant difference (p=0.03) was found between the groups of patients with respect to Natural Killer cells but other subsets showed no significant difference. Post-operatively the significant difference between Natural Killer cells resolved. T-helper lymphocytes, cytotoxic lymphocytes, memory T-lymphocytes and naïve T-lymphocytes in both groups showed decreases in values immediately post surgery, recovering to normal values within 6 weeks post-surgery. The allograft group showed significant increases from baseline in cytotoxic T-lymphocytes at 6 months (p< 0.01) and memory T-lymphocytes one year postoperatively (p=0.04). B-lymphocyte numbers did not alter significantly from baseline.

Conclusion: Cytotoxic T-lymphocytes recognise HLA-class I molecules which are present on all nucleated cells and have been implicated in having a role in osteoclast regulation. Memory T-lymphocytes are produced after a naïve T-lymphocyte is exposed to an antigen. The observed increases of these subsets were not observed in the non-grafting group suggesting the allografted bone had elicited an immunological response. At 12 months all grafts appeared radiologically stable and the immunological response may have been beneficial to the outcome.

Introduction: The long term success of impaction grafting depends on the remodelling process during incorporation. This project was designed to characterise any differences in the biochemical markers of bone turnover following revision hip arthroplasty performed with or without impaction grafting.

Methods: 87 patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty were entered into this prospective study and grouped according to whether impaction allograft was used or not. Biochemical markers of bone turnover were assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively on day 2, day 9, week 6, 6 months and 1 year. Osteocalcin, pro-collagen type-I N-terminal propeptide and bone specific alkaline phosphatase were measured as bone formation markers. C-telopeptide, pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline were measured as bone resorption markers.

Results: All patients had a successful radiological and clinical outcome at one year. 50 patients with radiologically defined host-graft union were compared with 37 patients who did not receive allograft. Markers of bone formation tended to rise by day 9 but the rise in osteocalcin was delayed in the graft group and was significantly lower at 6 months in comparison to the non-graft group (p=0.002). Alkaline phosphatase levels remained significantly elevated at one year in the graft group (p=0.027) whilst levels in the non-graft group had normalised. Markers of bone resorption also rise in both groups but with no significant differences between the groups.

Discussion: Following impaction grafting, new bone formation may be delayed in comparison to revisions performed without graft. The pattern of markers of bone resorption did not differ significantly between the groups suggesting that there is no large scale resorption of the impacted allograft in these cases.

These results provide a biochemical insight into the bone formation and bone resorption processes during allograft incorporation.

Introduction: The long term success of impaction grafting depends on the remodelling process during incorporation. This project was devised to characterise any differences in the biochemical markers of bone turnover following revision hip arthroplasty performed with or without impaction grafting.

Methods: 87 patients were entered into this prospective study and grouped according to whether impaction allograft was used or not. Biochemical markers of bone turnover were assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively on day 2, day 9, week 6, 6 months and 1 year. Osteocalcin, procollagen type-I N-terminal propeptide and bone specific alkaline phosphatase were measured as bone formation markers. C-telopeptide, pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline were measured as bone resorption markers.

Results: All patients had a successful outcome at one year. 50 patients with radiologically defined host-graft union were compared with 37 patients who did not receive an allograft. Markers of bone formation tended to rise by day 9 but the rise in osteocalcin was delayed in the graft group and was significantly lower at 6 months in comparison to the non-graft group (p=0.002). Alkaline phosphatase levels remained significantly elevated at one year in the graft group (p=0.027) whilst levels in the non-graft group had normalised. Markers of bone resorption also rise in both groups but with no significant differences between the groups.

Discussion: Following impaction grafting, new bone formation may be delayed in comparison to revisions performed without graft. The pattern of markers of bone resorption did not differ significantly between the groups suggesting that there is no large scale resorption of the impacted allograft in these cases.

These results provide a biochemical insight into the bone formation and bone resorption processes during allograft incorporation.