The UK's NIHR and Australia's NHMRC have funded two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to determine if lumbar fusion surgery (LFS) is more effective than best conservative care (BCC) for adults with persistent, severe low back pain (LBP) attributable to lumbar spine degeneration. We aimed to describe clinicians’ decision-making regarding suitability of patient cases for LFS or BCC and level of equipoise to randomise participants in the RCTs. Two online cross-sectional surveys distributed via UK and Australian professional networks to clinicians involved in LBP care, collected data on clinical discipline, practice setting and preferred care of five patient cases (ranging in age, pain duration, BMI, imaging findings, neurological signs/symptoms). Clinicians were also asked about willingness to randomise each patient case.Background and Purpose
Methods
People with severe, persistent low back pain (LBP) may be offered lumbar spine fusion surgery if they have had insufficient benefit from recommended non-surgical treatments. However, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2016 guidelines recommended not offering spinal fusion surgery for adults with LBP, except as part of a randomized clinical trial. This survey aims to describe UK clinicians’ views about the suitability of patients for such a future trial, along with their views regarding equipoise for randomizing patients in a future clinical trial comparing lumbar spine fusion surgery to best conservative care (BCC; the FORENSIC-UK trial). An online cross-sectional survey was piloted by the multidisciplinary research team, then shared with clinical professional groups in the UK who are involved in the management of adults with severe, persistent LBP. The survey had seven sections that covered the demographic details of the clinician, five hypothetical case vignettes of patients with varying presentations, a series of questions regarding the preferred management, and whether or not each clinician would be willing to recruit the example patients into future clinical trials.Aims
Methods
Scoliosis is a lateral curvature of the spine with associated rotation, often causing distress due to appearance. For some curves, there is good evidence to support the use of a spinal brace, worn for 20 to 24 hours a day to minimize the curve, making it as straight as possible during growth, preventing progression. Compliance can be poor due to appearance and comfort. A night-time brace, worn for eight to 12 hours, can achieve higher levels of curve correction while patients are supine, and could be preferable for patients, but evidence of efficacy is limited. This is the protocol for a randomized controlled trial of ‘full-time bracing’ versus ‘night-time bracing’ in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). UK paediatric spine clinics will recruit 780 participants aged ten to 15 years-old with AIS, Risser stage 0, 1, or 2, and curve size (Cobb angle) 20° to 40° with apex at or below T7. Patients are randomly allocated 1:1, to either full-time or night-time bracing. A qualitative sub-study will explore communication and experiences of families in terms of bracing and research. Patient and Public Involvement & Engagement informed study design and will assist with aspects of trial delivery and dissemination.Aims
Methods
To evaluate the incidence of primary venous thromboembolism (VTE),
epidural haematoma, surgical site infection (SSI), and 90-day mortality
after elective spinal surgery, and the effect of two protocols for
prophylaxis. A total of 2181 adults underwent 2366 elective spinal procedures
between January 2007 and January 2012. All patients wore anti-embolic
stockings, mobilised early and were kept adequately hydrated. In
addition, 29% (689) of these were given low molecular weight heparin
(LMWH) while in hospital. SSI surveillance was undertaken using the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria.Aims
Patients and Methods
Rates of mortality as high as 25% to 30% have been described
following fractures of the odontoid in the elderly population. The
aim of this study was to examine whether easily identifiable variables
present on admission are associated with mortality. A consecutive series of 83 elderly patients with a fracture of
the odontoid following a low-impact injury was identified retrospectively.
Data that were collected included demographics, past medical history
and the results of blood tests on admission. Radiological investigations
were used to assess the Anderson and D’Alonzo classification and
displacement of the fracture. The mean age was 82.9 years (65 to
101). Most patients (66; 79.5%) had a type 2 fracture. An associated
neurological deficit was present in 11 (13.3%). All were treated
conservatively; 80 (96.4%) with a hard collar and three (3.6%) with
halo vest immobilisation.Aims
Patients and Methods
We present a case series of five patients who had revision surgery
following magnetic controlled growing rods (MGCR) for early onset
scoliosis. Metallosis was found during revision in four out of five
patients and we postulated a mechanism for rod failure based on
retrieval analysis. Retrieval analysis was performed on the seven explanted rods.
The mean duration of MCGR from implantation to revision was 35 months
(17 to 46). The mean age at revision was 12 years (7 to 15; four
boys, one girl).Aims
Patients and Methods
To determine the efficacy and safety of the Magec system in early onset scoliosis (EOS). In 2011, 6 males and 2 females had Magec rods, with an average age of 8.5 years (2.9–12.7 years), 7 patients had dual rods, and 1 had single. The main cause of EOS was idiopathic scoliosis (n=6), followed by Congenital (n=1), and Syndromic (n=1). Average follow up was 19.4 months (14–26 months). 4 of these patients had their previous Paediatric Isola growing rods exchanged to Magec, and 1 patient had an exchange from single to Dual Magec rods.Aim:
Methods:
To measure truncal parameters for patients treated with growing rod systems for early onset scoliosis (EOS). 44 patients underwent growth rod surgery for EOS between 1999 and 2013 (24 females and 20 males). 27 patients had idiopathic scoliosis, 13 congenital, 3 syndromic and 1 neuromuscular. 26 patients had Paediatric Isola, 8 had Paediatric Expedium, 4 had dual growth rods with domino's and 9 each had VEPTR and MAGEC rods systems. Medical records and radiographs were analysed. Cobb angle, T1-T12 and T1-S1 length, coronal and sagittal balance, apical vertical translation (AVT), space available for the lung (SAL) and shoulder balance were measured.Aim:
Methods:
The British Scoliosis Society published a document in 2008 which set out the minimum standards for paediatric spinal deformity services to achieve over a period of time. But how do the UK paediatric spinal deformity centres measure up to these benchmarks? We performed a telephonic survey, contacting every UK spinal deformity centre. The questionnaire probed how each unit compared to the recommended standards.Introduction
Methods
Comparison between Aprotinin and Tranexamic acid on blood conservation in scoliosis surgery. There is no difference in the control of blood loss between 2 drugs.Purpose
Null hypothesis
Retrospective review of growth sparing spinal instrumentation. Medical records of 30 children with spinal deformity treated were evaluated. There were 14 male and 16 female patients at an average age of 4.9 years (1-14) at the time of presentation. These included 18 idiopathic, 11 congenital and a 14 year old with delayed growth having GH treatment. All patients underwent dual growing rod construct using hook and pedicle screw instrumentation. Extensions were carried out at approximately 6 monthly intervals. Average follow up was 4.2 years (2-8.5) with an average of 7.3(3-15) extension/exchange procedures per patient. Average immediate postoperative Cobb angle was 29(15-55) from a preoperative Cobb of 68(55-100) and this was maintained to a final mean Cobb angle of 30(15-60). Average gain in T1-S1 length was 5.7(3.5-9.8) cm. Five patients had final fusion at an average age of 15.5 years. There were no infections following primary operation. Out of 249 procedures including extensions/exchange, there were 9(4.5%) episodes of deep infection in 7 patients requiring debridement. Four patients (13%) had revisions for rod breakage/screw loosening/hook pullout/junctional kyphosis and three(10%) had prominent implants.Purpose
Methods and results
To evaluate efficacy of blood conservation strategies on transfusion requirements in adult scoliosis surgery and establish a protocol for cross matching. Retrospective review of 50 consecutive adult scoliosis patients treated using anterior only(14,28%), posterior only(19,38%) or combined(17,34%) approaches. All patients were anaesthetised by the same anaesthetist implementing a standard protocol using cell salvage, controlled hypotension and antifibrinolytics. Mean age was 24.6 years. BMI was 21.9. On an average 9.5(6-15) levels were fused, with an average duration of surgery of 284.6(130-550) minutes. Antifibrinolytics were used in 31(62%) of the patients which included Aprotinin in 21(42%) and Tranexamic acid in 10(20%). Patients on antifibrinolytics had a significantly (p<0.05) lower blood loss (530ml) as compared to other patients (672ml). Mean volume of the cell saved blood re-transfused was 693.8 ml and mean postoperative HB level dropped to 10.7 g/dl(7.7-15) from a mean preoperative of 13.3 g/dl(10-17). 7(42%) with combined approaches and 3(15.8%) with posterior only approach required blood transfusion, 4/50(8%) of which required intra while 6/50(12%) required intra and postoperative transfusion. None of the patients having anterior surgery alone required blood transfusion.Purpose
Methods and Results
To compare the effectiveness of the Aspen, Aspen Vista, Philadelphia, Miami-J and Miami-J Advanced collars at restricting cervical spine movement in the sagittal, coronal and axial planes. Nineteen healthy volunteers (12 female, 7 male) were recruited to the study. Collars were fitted by an approved physiotherapist. Eight ProReflex (Qualisys, Sweden) infra-red cameras were used to track the movement of retro reflective marker clusters placed in predetermined positions on the head and trunk. 3D kinematic data was collected during forward flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation from uncollared and collared subjects. The physiological range of motion in the three planes was analysed using the Qualisys Track Manager system.Objective
Methods
Reported incidence of DVT after spinal surgery ranges from 0-15% and PE 0.5-2.7%. Theoretically, manipulation of the vessels and venous stasis caused by retraction during anterior lumbar inter-body fusion may increase the propensity for thrombosis. The reported incidence of DVT and PE following major abdominal and pelvic surgery are high (up to 23%) and all these patients routinely receive chemical prophylaxis. Should patients undergoing ALIF surgery receive chemical prophylaxis routinely?Introduction
Aim
To investigate current practice of thromboprophylaxis in major UK spinal centres for both trauma and elective surgery, and to asses compliance with NICE guidelines A telephonic survey was carried out which comprised of questions relating to current practice of thromboprophylaxis in major spinal units across the UK. Questions probed practice with regard to trauma versus elective surgery, agents used, timing of prophylaxis, length of treatment and whether practice has changed since the introduction of NICE guidelines.Purpose of Study
Methods
To highlight the absence of an important pitfall in the Advanced Trauma Life Support protocol in application of rigid collar to patients with potentially unstable cervical spine injury. We present a case series of two patients with ankylosed cervical spines who developed neurological complications following application of rigid collar for cervical spine injuries as per the ATLS protocol. This has been followed up with a survey of A&E and T&O doctors who regularly apply cervical collars for suspected unstable cervical spine injuries. The survey was conducted telephonically using a standard questionnaire. 75 doctors completed the questionnaire. A&E doctors = 42, T&O = 33. Junior grade = 38, middle grade = 37. Trauma management frontline experience >1yr = 50, <1yr = 25. Of the 75 respondents 68/75 (90.6%) would follow the ATLS protocol in applying rigid collar in potentially unstable cervical spine injuries. 58/75 (77.3%) would clinically assess the patient prior to applying collar. Only 43/75 (57.3%) thought the patients relevant past medical history would influence collar application. Respondents were asked whether they were aware of any pitfalls to rigid collar application in suspected neck injuries. 34/75 (45.3%) stated that they were NOT aware of pitfalls. The lack of awareness was even higher 17/25 (68%) amongst doctors with less that 12 months frontline experience. When directly asked whether ankylosing spondylitis should be regarded as a pitfall then only 43/75 (57.3%) answered in the affirmative.Aim of Study
Study Method
Halo traction, either on bed or with an accompanying vest is used commonly in Spine surgery, in a variety of clinical situations. The pins are inserted into the skull in safe anatomic zones, using wrenches that are either pre-torqued or exhibit a torque gauge to allow measurable torque application. A torque of 6 – 8 inch pounds is considered ideal for optimal pin tightening. Lesser torques may hypothetically lead to pin loosening and pin track infections, while, excessive torques could lead to pin penetration through the skull. To test the accuracy and consistency of different torque wrenches used for Halo pin insertion, using a standardised calibration device.Introduction
Aim
Incidence of pars defect associated with idiopathic scoliosis has been reported as 6% based on roentgenographic evaluation in previous studies. (Fisk et al, 1978). We aim to present our results in an MRI based study. 224 patients of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who had an MRI scan over a period of three years (2006-2008), performed either as a preoperative investigation or due to other symptoms were reviewed. All MRI scans were reviewed by two experienced musculoskeletal radiology consultants independently. Among 224 patients 13 (5.8%) patients were found to have pars defect. Mean age-group of patients were (19 years, range-11-40). 84.6% (n=11) patients were female and 15.3% patients were male. There was varying severity of curve patterns. We have noted two lumbar/thoraco-lumbar curves (Lenke 5), King Type I-6, King Type II-2 and three King Type III curves. All scoliotic deformities were non-structural. Bilateral pars defect was noted in nine (69%) patients. Previous studies (Fisk et al, 1978; Mau H 1981) have described the incidence of pars defect as approximately 6.2%. Recent studies have emphasized use of MRI to diagnose pars defect based on signal changes in the pedicle (Sairyo et al.). Our study reveals the incidence of pars defect in AIS to be 5.8 % based on MRI diagnosis which does not seem to be different to previous roentgenographic studies.
In major procedures like scoliosis surgery, parents are often asked to sign the consent on behalf of children because of the pretext that minor may have limited understanding and judgement about the procedure. Scoliosis surgery for patients with AIS is mainly indicated for cosmetic or psychological reasons. We audited our practice in the department to collect information on the current consent practices involving the minor patients undergoing scoliosis surgery. We also have conducted a questionnaire survey of the various spinal units in UK to assess their practice in this regard. Forty-two consent forms (28 patients; multiple procedures in some patients) and case notes of patients between 12 and 16 years undergoing scoliosis surgery were reviewed. We have contacted 12 spinal deformity correction units and 11 spinal trauma units across UK over telephone to assess the current consenting practice as well. 9.5% (n=4) patients signed there own consent forms. Except in one case explanation of risks were documented in detail. Except two units (18%) offering the minor patient to sign their consent, parents are usually asked to sign consent on their behalf in majority (10/12) units. Seven out of the twelve spinal units use standard NHS or department of health consent forms. Few units have their own consent form with some alterations or additions. There is no specific age when a child becomes competent to consent to treatment: It depends both on the child and on the seriousness and complexity of the treatment being proposed. However, it is still good practice to encourage competent children to more involved along with their families in decision-making.
We do know that the use of stand-alone cage with no plate is prone to subsidence and segmental kyphosis. Cage and plate construct are prone to adjacent level ossification. Zero P (Synthes, UK) cage combines the functionality of spacer and anterior plate. Radiological evaluation of subsidence of cervical spine after anterior cervical interbody fusion using Zero P cage system. Method: Retrospective review of radiographic records of patients undergoing surgery between June 2008- Oct 2009. We evaluated lateral cervical standing radiographs before, after, 6 weeks, 3, 6 months of surgery. We measured subsidence (using Total Intervertebral Height (TIH). All measurements were done using Web 1000 (Impax Agfa). Two level was treated as single segment. Subsidence > 3mm was considered significant. 20 patients (11 male: 9 female) with median age of 51 yrs (40-65) underwent one (n=10) or two level (n= 10) cervical fusion. Immediately post-op there was increase in TIH in one and two level group by 1.74mm (1.61 and 4.25mm (1.48 respectively, which at 6 months reduced to 1.05mm (0.24 (p< 0.003) and 1.32mm (1.29 (p< 0.085) at 6 months respectively. Subsidence was seen in all cases and was rapid in first 3 months and then tailed off. It was significant (> 3mm) only in 2/20 (2%) patients at 6 months. Early results indicate that spine alignment is maintained radiologically with no associated complications as screw loosening, cage extrusion etc.
