The mobile-bearings were introduced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to improve the knee performance by simulating more closely ‘normal’ knee kinematics, and to increase the longevity of TKA by reducing the polyethylene wear and periprosthetic osteolysis. However, the superiority between posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing designs still remains controversial. The objective of the present study was to compare the mid-term results of Scorpio + Single Axis system (Stryker Howmedica Osteonics, Allendale, New Jersey) for the mobile-bearing knees and Duracon system (Stryker Howmedica Osteonics, Allendale, New Jersey) for the fixed bearing design with regard to clinical and roentgenographic outcome with special reference to any complications and survivorship. Prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled study was carried out on 56 patients undergoing primary, unilateral total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis, who were divided into two groups. Group I received mobile-bearing knee prosthesis (29 patients) and Group 2 received fixed-bearing prosthesis (27 patients). The patients were assessed by a physical examination and knee scoring systems preoperatively, at a follow-up of three months, six months, and one year after surgery by independent researcher who was not part of the operating team, and was blinded as to the type of implant inserted. We used the Oxford knee score (OKS) and Knee society score (KSS), with Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS) and Knee Society Functional Score (KSFS) being the subsets. The questionnaire for OKS was printed in our national language, and handed over to the patient at each visit.Introduction
Methods
