Current UK NICE guidelines on the prevention of thromboembolism state that all patients undergoing elective Hip or Knee Replacement surgery should be offered combined mechanical and pharmacological VTE prophylaxis. The original audit was performed between October 1999 and January 2009, totaling 7,532 patients. Updated to the full 10 years, a total of 8,140 patients underwent hip or knee replacement surgery (revision and primary) in our unit. Using a targeted thromboprophylaxis policy 83% of patients received mechanical A-V foot pumps only until mobile. High risk patients (12%) received in addition LMWH or fondaparinux, with only very high risk patients continuing on chemical prophylaxis post-discharge. All data are collected and stored on our own joint registry database with patients being assessed pre-operatively to determine their level of VTE risk.Background
Methods
Chemokines produced by synoviocytes of the subacromial bursa are up-regulated in subacromial inflammation (bursitis) and rotator cuff disease. SDF-1a is an important chemotactic factor in the subacromial bursa that stimulates recruitment of inflammatory cells; however, its mechanism of induction and regulation in the subacromial bursa is unknown. We hypothesised that SDF-1a production in bursal synoviocytes may be induced by local cytokines such as interleukin IL-1β and IL-6. Subacromial bursa specimens were obtained following an institutional review board-approved protocol from patients undergoing shoulder surgery. Bursal specimens were stained with anti-human antibodies to IL-1, IL-6 and SDF-1a by immunohistochemistry and compared to normal and rheumatoid controls. Bursal cells were also isolated from specimens and cultured. Cultured cells were labelled with fluorescent probes and analysed by flow cytometry to determine cell lineage. Early-passaged cells were then treated with cytokines IL-1β and IL-6 and SDF-1a production and expression were measured by ELISA and RT-PCR.Purpose
Methods
The distal femur fracture is a difficult injury that affects young men andelderly women. The tissue stripping that occurs with the traditional approach has been a factor in the development of complications like infection and nonunion. This study addresses the issue of minimally invasive approach. Does the LISS system really improve the results of such fracture? Fifty-two patients were included in the trial from six academic trauma centres. Twenty-eight fractures had been randomised to be fixed with the LISS device, while twenty-four had the DCS implant. Type C3 fractures were excluded as they were not amenable for fixation with DCS system. All procedures were performed via minimally invasive technique. The LISS system had the targeter that helped with plate insertion and distal diaphyseal screws placement. Radiography was utilised in the case of the DCS distal screws insertion. All fractures went onto union, except two participants in LISS group who had to be revised due to loss of reduction, in the early post-operative peroid. There were three nonunions in the same group. These required a re-operation. Further more, a LISS participant who had re-injured his distal femur (unrelated to LISS plate), was fixed with different implant. There was a single nonunion with the DCS group that needed revision surgery. There was one participant from each group who had drifted into varus. Neither required a re-operation. This translated into a 21% re-operation rate in the LISS system compared to 4% with the DCS device. Our data supports the use of the DCS system in the fixation of distal femur fractures (except Type C3} via a minimally invasive approach. The LISS implant seems to be technique dependent. In our centre, the LISS plate had been discontinued in favour of the DCP and LCP systems.
In the UK 70,000 knee arthroplasties are performed each year. Although outcomes from knee arthroplasties are usually excellent, they can nevertheless lead to negligence claims. The aim of this study was to establish the incidence, cost and cause of negligence claims arising from knee arthroplasties. All claims made to the NHS Litigation Authority between 2003 and 2008, where the operation was knee arthroplasty, were included in this study. Data obtained from the NHS Litigation Authority were reviewed, coded and analysed. For negligence to have occurred, patients must have suffered harm as a result of substandard care. Hence the cause of negligence claims was analysed in terms of: (1) Substandard care and (2) Harm caused.Background
Method
A commonly held belief amongst surgeons and patients is that progression of disease (arthritis) to other compartments is a major cause of early failure of UKRs. We analysed the NJR database records of 17,643 primary UKRs performed between April 2003 and April 2009. Where these had been revised the reason for revision was noted.Background
Methods
Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is an established treatment for single compartment end-stage knee arthrosis with good recorded survivorship. Although often used in more active younger patients, patient selection remains controversial. To identify risk factors for early failure we compared patients with UKR failure requiring revision to total knee replacement (TKR) with a control group. Between September 2002 and 2008, 812 Oxford Mobile Bearing Medial UKRs were implanted. 21 implants (20 patients) required revision to TKR within 5 years. The leading cause for revision was lateral compartment disease progression (11 patients). In the revision group, 17 patients were female (81%), average age at index surgery was 64.1 (range 48-81) and average BMI 31.8 (range 24.4-41.5). In the control group of all patients who underwent UKR during this period, 348 patients were female (44%), average age was 65.0 (range 36-89) and average BMI 31.2 (range 21.0-61.0). Radiological assessment of the tibiofemoral valgus (TFV) angle for revision patients was compared with an age and sex matched control group. In the revision group, average TFV angle was +1.5 pre-operatively and +6.1 post-operatively with an average change of +4.6. In the control group average TFV angle was -0.4 pre-operatively and +4.3 post-operatively with an average change of +4.7.Background
Methods & Results
Total disc replacement (TDR) provides an alternative to fusion that is designed to preserve motion at the treated level and restore disc height. The effects of TDR on spine biomechanics at the treated and adjacent levels are not fully understood. Thus, the present study investigated facet changes in contact pressure, peak contact pressure, force, peak force, and contact area at the facet joints after TDR. Seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric lumbar spines were potted at T12 and L5 and installed in a 6-DOF displacement-controlled testing system. Displacements of 15° flexion/extension, 10° right/left bending, and 10° right/left axial rotation were applied. Contact pressure, peak contact pressure, force, peak force and contact area for each facet joint were recorded at L2-L3 and L3-L4 before and after TDR at L3-L4 (ProDisc-L, Synthes Spine). The data were analysed with ANOVAs/t-tests.Introduction
Methods
There are different opinions amongst surgeons as to the selection criteria for UKR with regards to age and BMI. Many surgeons perceive higher rates of failure in young or overweight patients or often choose TKR for elderly patients. We analysed the registry records (UK National Joint Registry) of 10,104 patients who had undergone UKR with a minimum of two years follow-up from their primary surgery. BMI data was recorded in 1,831 (18%) and age in all. There were 295 deaths and these patients were excluded from our analysis. Patients' BMI were categorised according to Department of Health and WHO (2004) classification (Normal, Pre-Obese, Obese I, Obese II, Obese III)Background
Methods
