Background. There is doubt regarding resection compared to curettage for pelvic metastases. Previous studies have reported that curettage is associated with decreased survival compared with wide resection, and have justified a radical surgical approach to achieve pain palliation and tumor control. Aim. To evaluate the role of wide en bloc resection compared to curettage/marginal resection for patients with pelvic metastases. The rationale was that wide resection does not improve survival even in patients with solitary pelvic metastases. Method. Between 1985 and 2009, 21 patients (6 women, 15 men; age, 34–76 years) were treated for pelvic metastases. Histology included thyroid carcinoma in 5 patients, bladder carcinoma in 4 patients, renal and endometrium in 2 cases each and colon, ovarium, cerebral and lung carcinoma in 1 case each; the primary tumor was undiagnosed in 4 patients. Three patients had sacral and 1 patient had sacroiliac joint metastasis. According to Enneking's classification of the anatomical site involved, 5 patients had type I, 1 patient had type II, 6 patients had type III, 1 patient had type I and II, and 4 patients had type II and III pelvic metastasis. Metastatic disease was localized in the pelvic ring in 15 patients and multifocal in 6 patients. Eight patients had surgical treatment only; 13 patients had surgical treatment in addition to radiation therapy (2 patients), chemotherapy (1 patient), embolization (3 patients), or combined adjuvant treatments (7 patients). 21 patients with pelvic metastases were treated with wide resection (12 patients) and curettage/marginal resection (9 patients) and adjuvants. Sixteen patients had solitary pelvic metastases. Reconstruction of the hip joint was performed in three patients. Results. At a mean of 27.6 months (range, 2–152 months), the overall survival to death and local recurrence was 15% at 66 months and 47% at 26 months, respectively. Survival to death of patients treated with wide en bloc resection was 18% at 46 months compared to 62% at 12months of patients treated with curettage/marginal resection; no difference in survival to death between wide en bloc resection and curettage/marginal resection was observed (p=0.570). Survival to local recurrence of patients treated with wide en bloc resection was 67% at 24 months compared to 26% at 24 months of patients treated with curettage/marginal resection; this was also not statistically significant (p=0.0683). One patient treated with wide en bloc resection for a solitary pelvic bone metastasis had a postoperative complication. Conclusion. This series showed that neither the combination of surgical and adjuvant treatments nor the type of surgical resection were statistically significant parameters for local recurrence. We found no difference in survival to death or local recurrence 1 with wide en bloc resection compared to curettage or marginal resection, even in patients with solitary pelvic metastases

Background. Giant cell tumours of bone (GCT) are benign bone tumours with a locally aggressive character. Local recurrence is considered the main complication of surgical treatment and is described in up to 50% of patients. Intralesional curettage with the use of adjuvants like phenol or polymethylmetacrylate (PMMA) is recommended as initial treatment, significantly decreasing the risk of recurrence. However, risk factors for local recurrence in skeletal GCT have not yet been firmly established and a golden standard for local therapy remains controversial. Objective. The identification of risk factors predisposing for an increased risk of local recurrence. In addition, different surgical techniques are compared to identify the optimal surgical approach for the identified risk factors. Methods. In a retrospective study all 215 patients with bone GCT treated between 1964 and 2009 in one centre were included, of which 193 were suitable for analysis. All patients had minimal follow-up of 12 months (mean 115; range 12–445). Using a Kaplan Meier survival analysis recurrence free survival rates were calculated. Cox-regression was used to determine the influence of different types of therapy, the use of adjuvants, and various patient and tumour characteristics. Results. The mean local recurrence rate for all patients was 35.2% (n=68, 95%CI: 28.3–42.1). Recurrence rate after wide resection was 0.17 (n=6, 95%CI: 0.04–0.29), after curettage with adjuvants 0.32 (n=42, 95%CI 0.24–0.41) and after curettage alone 0.74 (n=20, 95%CI: 0.57–0.91, p < 0.001). Soft tissue extension (Hazard Ratio: 3.8, p < 0.001), localisation in radius and ulna (HR: 2.6, p=0.013), and surgical experience (HR: 2.2, p=0.022) were identified as significant general risk factors for local recurrence. For intralesional resection, Campanacci grade III (HR: 3.9, p=0.019) and location in axial skeleton (HR: 3.3, p=0.016) additionally significantly increased this risk. Comparing treatments our data showed that curettage followed by adjuvants was superior to curettage alone (p < 0.004), and the application of both phenol and PMMA did not present a significantly better outcome than curettage and PMMA alone (HR: 1.07, p=0.881). Conclusion. Of all possible risk factors only soft tissue extension, localisation in radius and ulna and non-radical resections significantly influenced the risk of local recurrence for all treatments. In addition, we found that high-grade tumours and localisation in the axial skeleton were additional risk factors for local recurrence after intralesional surgery. Although wide resection increases patient morbidity, it can be the therapy of choice in high risk patients. Intralesional therapy can be advised for low recurrence risk patients using curettage and PMMA only, whereas our study could not confirm the predicted effect of phenol as an additional adjuvant