Abstract
Background
There is doubt regarding resection compared to curettage for pelvic metastases. Previous studies have reported that curettage is associated with decreased survival compared with wide resection, and have justified a radical surgical approach to achieve pain palliation and tumor control.
Aim
To evaluate the role of wide en bloc resection compared to curettage/marginal resection for patients with pelvic metastases. The rationale was that wide resection does not improve survival even in patients with solitary pelvic metastases.
Method
Between 1985 and 2009, 21 patients (6 women, 15 men; age, 34–76 years) were treated for pelvic metastases. Histology included thyroid carcinoma in 5 patients, bladder carcinoma in 4 patients, renal and endometrium in 2 cases each and colon, ovarium, cerebral and lung carcinoma in 1 case each; the primary tumor was undiagnosed in 4 patients. Three patients had sacral and 1 patient had sacroiliac joint metastasis. According to Enneking's classification of the anatomical site involved, 5 patients had type I, 1 patient had type II, 6 patients had type III, 1 patient had type I and II, and 4 patients had type II and III pelvic metastasis. Metastatic disease was localized in the pelvic ring in 15 patients and multifocal in 6 patients. Eight patients had surgical treatment only; 13 patients had surgical treatment in addition to radiation therapy (2 patients), chemotherapy (1 patient), embolization (3 patients), or combined adjuvant treatments (7 patients). 21 patients with pelvic metastases were treated with wide resection (12 patients) and curettage/marginal resection (9 patients) and adjuvants. Sixteen patients had solitary pelvic metastases. Reconstruction of the hip joint was performed in three patients.
Results
At a mean of 27.6 months (range, 2–152 months), the overall survival to death and local recurrence was 15% at 66 months and 47% at 26 months, respectively. Survival to death of patients treated with wide en bloc resection was 18% at 46 months compared to 62% at 12months of patients treated with curettage/marginal resection; no difference in survival to death between wide en bloc resection and curettage/marginal resection was observed (p=0.570). Survival to local recurrence of patients treated with wide en bloc resection was 67% at 24 months compared to 26% at 24 months of patients treated with curettage/marginal resection; this was also not statistically significant (p=0.0683). One patient treated with wide en bloc resection for a solitary pelvic bone metastasis had a postoperative complication.
Conclusion
This series showed that neither the combination of surgical and adjuvant treatments nor the type of surgical resection were statistically significant parameters for local recurrence. We found no difference in survival to death or local recurrence 1 with wide en bloc resection compared to curettage or marginal resection, even in patients with solitary pelvic metastases.
