Introduction. Patients (2.7M in EU) with positive cancer prognosis frequently develop metastases (≈1M) in their remaining lifetime. In 30-70% cases, metastases affect the spine, reducing the strength of the affected vertebrae. Fractures occur in ≈30% patients. Clinicians must choose between leaving the patient exposed to a high fracture risk (with dramatic consequences) and operating to stabilise the spine (exposing patients to unnecessary surgeries). Currently, surgeons rely on their sole experience. This often results in to under- or over-treatment. The standard-of-care are scoring systems (e.g. Spine Instability Neoplastic Score) based on medical images, with little consideration of the spine biomechanics, and of the structure of the vertebrae involved. Such scoring systems fail to provide clear indications in ≈60% patients. Method. The HEU-funded METASTRA project is implemented by biomechanicians, modellers, clinicians, experts in verification, validation, uncertainty quantification and certification from 15 partners across Europe. METASTRA aims to improve the stratification of patients with
Bone metastases radiographically appear as regions with high (i.e. blastic metastases) or low (i.e. lytic metastases) bone mineral density. The clinical assessment of metastatic features is based on computed tomography (CT) but it is still unclear if the actual size of the metastases can be accurately detected from the CT images and if the microstructure in regions surrounding the metastases is altered (Nägele et al., 2004, Calc Tiss Int). This study aims to evaluate (i) the capability of the CT in evaluating the metastases size and (ii) if metastases affect the bone microstructure around them. Ten spine segments consisted of a vertebra with lytic or mixed metastases and an adjacent control (radiologically healthy) were obtained through an ethically approved donation program. The specimens were scanned with a clinical CT (AquilionOne, Toshiba: slice thickness:1mm, in-plane resolution:0.45mm) to assess clinical metastatic features and a micro-CT (VivaCT80, Scanco, isotropic voxel size:0.039mm) to evaluate the detailed microstructure. The volume of the metastases was measured from both CT and micro-CT images (Palanca et al., 2021, Bone) and compared with a linear regression. The microstructural alteration around the metastases was evaluated in the volume of interest (VOI) defined in the micro-CT images as the volume of the vertebral body excluding the metastases. Three 3D microstructural parameters were calculated in the VOI (CTAn, Bruker SkyScan): Bone Volume Fraction (BV/TV), Trabecular Thickness (Tb.Th.), Trabecular Spacing (Tb.Sp.). Medians of each parameter were compared (Kruskal-Wallis, p=0.05). One specimen was excluded as it was not possible to define the size of the metastases in the CT scans. A strong correlation between the volume obtained from the CT and micro-CT images was found (R2=0.91, Slope=0.97, Intercept=2.55, RMSE=5.7%, MaxError=13.12%). The differences in BV/TV, Tb.Th. and Tb.Sp. among vertebrae with lytic and mixed metastases and control vertebrae were not statistically significant (p-value>0.6). Similar median values of BV/TV were found in vertebrae with lytic (13.2±2.4%) and mixed (12.8±9.8%) metastases, and in controls (13.0±10.1%). The median Tb.Th. was 176±18 ∓m, 179±43 ∓m and 167±91 ∓m in vertebrae with lytic and mixed metastases and control vertebrae, respectively. The median Tb. Sp. was 846±26 ∓m, 849±286 ∓m and 880±116 ∓m in vertebrae with lytic and mixed metastases and control vertebrae, respectively. In conclusion, the size of