Introduction. Angular deformities of the distal femur can be corrected by opening, closing and neutral wedge techniques. Opening wedge (OW) and closing wedge (CW) are popular and well described in the literature. CW and OW techniques lead to leg length difference whereas the advantage of neutral wedge (NW) technique has several unique advantages. NW technique maintains limb length, wedge taken from the closing side is utilised on the opening side and since the angular correction is only half of the measured wedge on either side, translation of distal fragment is minimum. Leg lengths are not altered with this technique hence a useful technique in large deformities. We found no reports of clinical outcomes using NW technique. We present a technique of performing external fixator assisted NW correction of large valgus and varus deformities of distal femur and dual plating and discuss the results. Materials & Methods. We have treated 20 (22 limbs – 2 patients requiring staged bilateral corrections) patients for distal femoral varus and valgus deformities with CWDFO between 2019 and 2022. Out of these 4 patients (5 limbs) requiring large corrections of distal femoral angular deformities were treated with Neutral Wedge (NW) technique. 3 patients (four limbs) had distal femoral valgus deformity and one distal femoral varus deformity. Indication for NW technique is an angular deformity (varus or valgus of distal femur) requiring > 12 mm opening/closing wedge correction. We approached the closing side first and marked out the half of the calculated wedge with K – wires in a uniplanar fashion. Then an external fixator with two Schanz screws is applied on the opposite side, inserting the distal screw parallel to the articular surface and the proximal screw 6–7 cm proximal to the first pin and at right angles to the femoral shaft mechanical axis. Then the measured wedge is removed and carefully saved. External fixator is now used to close the wedge and over correct, creating an appropriate opening wedge on the opposite side. A Tomofix (Depuoy Synthes) plate is applied on the closing side with two screws proximal to osteotomy and two distally (to be completed later). Next the osteotomy on the opposite side is exposed, the graft is inserted. mLDFA is measured under image intensifier to confirm satisfactory correction. Closing wedge side fixation is then completed followed by fixation of opposite side with a Tomofix or a locking plate. Results. 3 patients (4 limbs) had genu valgum due to constitutional causes and one was a case of distal femoral varus from a fracture. Preoperative mLDFA ranged from 70–75° and in one case of varus deformity it was 103°. We achieved satisfactory correction of mLDFA in (85–90°) in 4 limbs and one measured 91°. Femoral length was not altered. JLCA was not affected post correction. Patients were allowed to weight bear for transfers for the first six weeks and full weight bearing was allowed at six weeks with crutches until healing of osteotomy. All osteotomies healed at 16–18 weeks (average 16.8 weeks). Patients regained full range of movement. We routinely recommend removal of metal work to facilitate future knee replacement if one is needed. Follow up ranged from 4 months to 2 yrs. Irritation from metal work was noted in 2 patients and resolved after removing the plates at 9 months post-surgery. Conclusions. NWDFO is a good option for large corrections. We describe a technique that facilitates accurate correction of deformity in these complex cases. Osteotomy heals predictably with uniplanar osteotomy and dual plate fixation. Metal work might cause irritation like other osteotomy and plating techniques in this location

Purpose. Various alignment philosophies for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been described, all striving to achieve excellent long-term implant survival and good functional outcomes. In recent years, in search of higher functionality and patient satisfaction, a shift towards more patient-specific alignment is seen. Robotics is the perfect technology to tailor alignment. The purpose of this study was to describe ‘inverse kinematic alignment’ (iKA) technique, and to compare clinical outcomes of patients that underwent robotic-assisted TKA performed by iKA versus adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA). Methods. The authors analysed the records of a consecutive series of patients that received robotic assisted TKA with iKA (n=40) and with aMA (n=40). Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and satisfaction on a visual analogue scale (VAS) were collected at a follow-up of 12 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds, and uni- and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine associations of OKS and satisfaction with 6 variables (age, sex, body mass index (BMI), preoperative hip knee ankle (HKA) angle, preoperative OKS, alignment technique). Results. The iKA and aMA techniques yielded comparable outcome scores (p=0.069), with OKS respectively 44.6±3.5 and 42.2±6.3. VAS Satisfaction was better (p=0.012) with iKA (9.2±0.8) compared to aMA (8.5±1.3). The number of patients that achieved OKS and satisfaction PASS thresholds was significantly higher (p=0.049 and p=0.003, respectively) using iKA (98% and 80%) compared to aMA (85% and 48%). Knees with preoperative varus deformity, achieved significantly (p=0.025) better OKS using iKA (45.4±2.0) compared to aMA (41.4±6.8). Multivariable analyses confirmed better OKS (β=3.1; p=0.007) and satisfaction (β=0.73; p=0.005) with iKA. Conclusions. The results of this study suggest that iKA and aMA grant comparable clinical outcomes at 12-months follow-up, though a greater proportion of knees operated by iKA achieved the PASS thresholds for OKS and satisfaction. Notably. in knees with preoperative varus deformity, iKA yielded significantly better OKS and satisfaction than aMA

Introduction. We assessed the role of four different High Tibial osteotomies (HTOs) for medial compartment osteoarthritis of knee (MCOA): Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy (MOWHTO), Focal Dome Osteotomy with Ilizarov Fixator (FDO-I), intra-articular, Tibial Condylar Valgus Osteotomy with plating (TCVO-P) and intra-articular plus extra-articular osteotomy with Ilizarov(TCVO-I); in correcting three deformity categories: primary coronal plane varus measured by Mechanical Axis deviation (MAD), secondary intra-articular deformities measured by Condylar Plateau Angle (CPA) and Joint Line Convergence Angle (JLCA), and tertiary sagittal, rotational and axial plane deformities in choosing them. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively studied HTOs in 141 knees (126 patients). There were 58, 40, 26, and 17 knees respectively in MOWHTO, FDO-I, TCVO-P and TCVO-I. We measured preoperative (bo) And postoperative (po) deformity parameters. Results. Average age was 56.1, average follow-up was 44.6 months. Mean bo-MAD in MOWHTO, FDO-I, TCVO-P, and TCVO-I were 8.8, −14.7, −11.5, −30.8% respectively. po-MAD was close to Fujisawa point in all except TCVO-P (45.2%). CPA corrected from −4.9° to −1.4° (p=0.02)and JLCA from 5.6° to 3.2° (p=0.001); CPA was better corrected by Intra-articular osteotomies (p=0.01). Conclusions. MOWHTO corrects isolated mild primary varus deformities (bo-MAD≥ 0%). Primary varus (bo-MAD= −25% −0%) with associated tertiary sagittal, rotational, or axial deformities, without secondary intra-articular deformities needed FDO-I. Primary varus (bo-MAD= −25% −0%) with secondary intra-articular deformities, without tertiary deformities, corrected well with TCVO-P. TCVO-I corrects severe primary varus (bo-MAD< −25%) with large deformities in secondary and tertiary categories

Background:. Appropriate positioning of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components is a key concern of surgeons. Post-operative varus alignment has been associated with poorer clinical outcome scores and increased failure rates. However, obtaining neutral alignment can be challenging in cases with significant pre-operative varus deformity. Questions:. 1) In patients with pre-operative varus deformities, does residual post-operative varus limb alignment lead to increased revision rates or poorer outcome scores compared to correction to neutral alignment? 2) Does placing the tibial component in varus alignment lead to increased revision rates and poorer outcome scores? 3) Does femoral component alignment affect revision rates and outcome scores? 4) Do these findings change in patients with at least 10 degrees of varus alignment pre-operatively?. Patients and Methods:. 553 patients undergoing TKA for varus osteoarthritis were identified from a prospective database. Patients were divided into those with residual post-operative varus and those with neutral post-operative alignment. Revision rates and clinical outcome scores were compared between the two groups. Revision rates and outcome scores were also assessed based on post-operative component alignment. The analysis was repeated in a subgroup of patients with at least 10 degrees of pre-operative varus. Results:. At a mean follow-up of 5.7 years (range: 2 to 19.8 years), residual varus deformity did not yield significantly increased revision rates or poorer outcome scores. Varus tibial component alignment and valgus femoral component alignment were associated with poorer outcome scores. Results were similar in the significant varus subgroup. Conclusions:. Residual post-operative varus deformity after TKA does not yield poorer clinical results in patients with pre-operative varus deformities, providing tibial component varus is avoided

INTRODUCTION:. It has been reported that rotational deformity is present in varus osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee and the tibia rotates externally as the varus deformity progresses. Although many studies addressed the rotational alignment of the femoral and tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the pre-and postoperative changes of the rotational alignment in varus OA knee has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively analyze the alteration of rotational deformity after TKA for the varus OA knee. METHODS:. Between July 2011 and December 2012, 157 patients (159 knees) with primary varus OA knee undergoing TKA were included. A mobile-bearing, posterior stabilized knee prosthesis was implanted with cement in all patients. Rotational deformities were evaluated with computed tomography (CT) before and after the operation. On the selected CT slices, the relative rotational position of the femur and tibia was quantified as an angle between the line perpendicular to the surgical epicondylar axis of the femur and the line connecting the tibial tubercle tip and the geometric center of the tibia. The knees were divided into three groups according to the preoperative varus deformity (Group I; 0–8° varus, n = 78, Group II; 9–17 ° varus, n = 71 and Group III; 18 ° or greater varus, n = 10) and the difference among the groups were statistically analyzed. RESULTS:. Preoperatively, the average rotational deformity was 6.4 ± 0.9 ° (mean ± SE) external rotation of the tibia relative to the femur. This was significantly corrected to 0.9 ± 0.6 ° external rotation of tibia postoperatively (p < 0.05). The amount of preoperative rotational deformities were not significantly different among the groups (Group I; 6.6 ± 0.9 ° e.r.(external rotation of tibia), Group II; 4.3 ± 1.8 ° e.r., Group III; 5.7 ± 4.1 ° e.r.). Although the rotational deformity wasã��corrected to almost neutral in Group I and II (1.1 ± 0.4 ° e.r. and 1.4 ± 0.9 ° e.r. respectively), there was a tendency with postoperative internal rotation of tibia in Group III (4.2 ± 2.4 ° internal rotation of tibia, p = 0.10). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION:. This study has demonstrated that rotational deformity in varus OA knee is significantly corrected after TKA. The knees with less preoperative varus deformity are more likely to be corrected to neutral but substantial rotational mismatch (internal rotation of the tibia) remains in the knees with severe varus deformity. This might be related to the amount of the medial soft tissue release required to obtain correct limb alignment. The surgeons who perform TKA should be aware of the information and carefully check the relative position of the tibial and femoral components especially in the knees with severe varus deformity

Introduction. The acquisition of proper soft tissue balance is one of the crucial factors for preventing long-term failure and obtaining successful treatment outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Medial collateral ligament (MCL) release is essential for encountering severe varus deformity. However, conventional subperiosteal MCL release for severe varus deformity can cause the complete detachment of MCL. This study compared retrospectively the results of complete distal release of the MCL with those of medial epicondylar osteotomy during ligament balancing in varus knee TKA. Methods. This study retrospectively reviewed 9 cases of complete distal release of the MCL (group 1) and 11 cases of medial epicondylar osteotomy (group 2) which were used to correct severe medial contracture. The clinical assessment was based on the American Knee Society knee score (KS), function score (FS), and the ROM preoperatively and at the final follow-up. For the radiological assessment, the femorotibial angle was measured based on the whole lower extremity radiograph preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Three months after surgery and at the final follow-up, medial instability was assessed using the valgus stress radiographs, in which the contralateral side was compared using Telos (Telos, Weterstadt, Germany). Results. The mean follow-up periods were 46.5 months (range, 36 to 78 months) and 39.8 months (range, 32 to 65 months), respectively. There were no significant differences in the clinical results between the two groups. However, the valgus stress radiograph revealed significant differences in medial instability. (Figure 1) In complete distal release of the MCL, some stability was obtained by repair and bracing but the medial instability could not be removed completely. (Figure 1). Conclusions. This study showed that medial instability could not be removed completely in the complete MCL distal release group. Medial epicondylar osteotomy for a varus deformity in TKA could provide constant medial stability and be a useful ligament balancing technique. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Severely varus deformed knees are common in Asian countries due to lifestyles such as sitting on the floor. MCL release is essential for encountering severe varus deformity. However, conventional subperiosteal MCL release for severe varus deformity can cause the complete detachment of MCL and it can induce mid-flexion instability. We performed medial epicondylar osteotomy when conventional subperiosteal MCL release couldn't resolve tight medial gap of severely varus deformity. The epicondyle is reattached with #5 nonabsorbable sutures or screws (figure 1). This study evaluated the clinical and radiologic results of medial epicondylar osteotomy for severe varus TKA. From 2004 to 2012, 63 cases (of total 909 cases of primary TKA, 6.9%) with a minimum follow-up of 2 years (24 to 116 months) were included in this study. Two cases of 63 cases were excluded due to the loss of follow up. Intraoperative medial and lateral gap difference in flexion and extension was accepted at less than 2 mm. Average follow up was 50.6±29.8 months (24–116 months). Average clinical knee score was 35.5±17.1 preoperatively and 89.1±8.4 postoperatively. Average function score improved from 48.7±16.0 preoperatively to 88.6±8.0 postoperatively. Average flexion contracture was reduced from 8.5±9.8° preoperatively to 1.0±2.3° postoperatively and range of motion improved from 112.0±21.8° preoperatively to 118.9±13.3° postoperatively. Preoperative femorotibial angle was average varus 10.4±5.7° and mechanical axis was average varus 16.7±5.6°. Postoperative femorotibial angle was average valgus 5.5±3.4° and mechanical axis was average varus 1.0±4.1° (figure 2). Valgus stress radiographs showed average 1.6±0.7 mm gap (femoral implant to liner) and varus stress radiographs revealed average 2.7±1.5 mm gap. The difference with medial and lateral gaps was average 1.2±1.1 mm (figure 2). Unions of bony wafer were 39 bony and 22 fibrotic unions (figure 3). According to the difference with medial and lateral gaps, bony union was average 1.2±1.2 mm and fibrotic union was average 1.2±0.9 mm. There were no significant differences between bony and fibrotic union groups. The clinical and radiological results of medial epicondylar osteotomy are satisfactory in severe varus TKA. The stability with bony and fibrotic unions is not different

Soft-tissue release plays an integral part in primary total knee arthroplasty by ‘balancing’ the knee. Asian patients often present late and consequently may have large deformities due to significant bone loss and contractures medially, and stretching of the lateral collateral ligament. Extra-articular deformities may aggravate the situation further and make correction of these deformities more arduous. Several techniques have been described for correction of deformity by soft-tissue releases. However, releasing the collateral ligament during TKA has unintended consequences such as the creation of significant mediolateral instability and a flexion gap which exceeds the extension gap; both of these may require a constrained prosthesis to achieve stability. We will show that soft-tissue balance can be achieved even in cases of severe varus deformity without performing a superficial medial collateral ligament release. The steps are: Determining pre-operatively whether deformity is predominantly intra-articular or extra-articular; Individualizing the valgus resection angle and bony resection depth; Reduction osteotomy, posteromedial capsule resection, sliding medial condylar osteotomy, extra-articular corrective osteotomy; Compensating for bone loss; Only rarely deploying a more constrained device. Case examples will be presented to illustrate the entire spectrum of varus deformities

Adequate soft tissue balance at the time of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prevents early failure. In cases of varus deformity, once the medial osteophytes have been resected, a progressive release of the medial soft tissue sleeve (MSS) from the proximal medial tibia is needed to achieve balance. The “classic” medial soft tissue release technique, popularised by John Insall et al., consists of a sharp subperiosteal dissection from the proximal medial tibia that includes superficial and deep medial collateral ligament (MCL), semimembranosus tendon, posteromedial capsule, along with the pes anserinus tendons, if needed. However, this technique allows for little control over releases that selectively affect the flexion and extension gaps. When severe deformity is present, an extensive MSS release can cause iatrogenic medial instability and the need to use a constrained implant. It has been suggested that the MSS can be elongated by performing selective releases. This algorithmic approach includes the resection of the posterior osteophytes as the initial balancing gesture. If additional MSS release is necessary in extension, a subperiosteal release of the posterior aspect of the MSS is performed with electrocautery, detaching the posterior aspect of the deep MCL, posteromedial capsule and semimembranosus tendon for the proximal and medial tibia. Dissection is rarely extended more than 1.5 cm distal to the joint line. If additional release is necessary in extension, the medial compartment is tensioned with a laminar spreader and multiple needle punctures (generally less than 8) are performed in the taut portion of the MSS using an 18G or 16G needle. If additional release is necessary to balance the flexion gap, multiple needle punctures in the anterior aspect of the MSS are performed. This stepwise approach to releasing the MSS in a patient with a varus deformity allows the surgeon to target areas that selectively affect the flexion and extension gaps. Its use has resulted in diminished use of constrained TKA constructs and subsequent cost savings. We have not seen an increase in post-operative instability developing within the first post-operative year. We recommend caution when implementing this technique. Unlike the traditional release method, pie-crusting is likely technique-dependent and failure can occur within the MCL itself. Due to the critical importance of the MCL in knee stability, further research and continuous follow up of patients undergoing TKA with this technique are warranted. Intra-operative sensing technology may be useful to quantitate the effect of pie-crusting on the compartmental loads and overall knee balance

Introduction. John Insall described medial release to balance the varus knee; the release he described included releasing the superficial MCL in severe varus cases. However, this release can create instability in the knee. Furthermore, this conventional wisdom does not correct the actual pathology which normally exists at the joint line, and instead it focuses on the distal end of the ligament where there is no pathology. We have established a new protocol consisting of 5 steps to balance the varus knee without releasing the superficial MCL and we tried this algorithm on a series of 115 patients with varus deformity and compared it to the outcome with a similar group that we have performed earlier using the traditional Insall technique. Material and method. 115 TKR were performed by the same surgeon using Zimmer Persona implant in varus arthritic knees. The deformities ranged from 15 to 35 degrees. First, the bony resection was made using Persona instrumentation as recommended by the manufacturer. The sequential balancing was divided into 5 steps (we will show a short video demonstrating the surgical techniques for each step) as follows:. Step 1: Releasing of deep MCL Step 2: Excising of osteophyte. Step 3: Excising of scarred tissue in the posteromedial corner soft phytes Step 4: Excision of the posteromedial capsule in case of flexion contracture Step 5: Releasing the semi-membranous (in gross deformity). We used soft tissue tensioner to balance the medial and lateral gaps. When the gaps are balanced at early step, there was no need to carry on the other steps. We used only primary implant and we did not have to use any constrained implant. We have compared this group with a similar group matched for deformity from previous 2 years where the conventional medial release as described by Insall. Results. We could balance all knees without releasing the superficial MCL ligament as follows:. -In[H1] 31 cases, we were able to balance the knees performing step 1 and step 2 only. -In 35 cases, we had to do step three in addition to 1 and 2 to achieve balance of cases. -In 25 cases, we performed step 4- those cases had pre-operative flexion contracture. -We had to proceed to step 5 only in 14 cases. These patients had the worst deformity in the group. We have used primary TKR in all cases; in 83 cases, we used a CR implant and in the rest, we used PS implant. Comparing this to the earlier conventional release we had to use 11 CCK implant on severe cases. Patient satisfaction was better with the new algorithm group when compared with the traditional release. Preserving the superficial MCL allowed us to maintain stability post-operatively and allowed us to use minimum constraint such as CR in severe deformity. Discussion. Many literatures have confirmed that cutting superficial MCL causes major medial instability after TKA. Releasing or pie crusting the superficial MCL can cause MCL insufficiency. Our protocol enable the surgeon to tackle the pathology rather than take a short-cut and releasing the superficial MCL. Reserving the superficial MCL allowed us to use minimal constraint even in severe deformity of 40 degrees of varus deformity. The conventional release has resulted in some cases instability, forcing us to use higher constraint such as CCK. Conclusion. Although releasing the superficial MCL has been described in different ways in multiple literature, little attention has been paid to the pathology of the posteromedial corner. This paper clearly shows that the complex anatomy of the posteromedial corner require us to pay better attention and this paper present better algorithm reserving the superficial MCL and enabling us to correct the deformity and balancing the soft tissue without instability. We strongly recommend surgeons not to release the superficial MCL because this will create instability in some cases

INTRODUCTION. In patients presenting with significant ligamentous instability/insufficiency and/or significant varus/valgus deformity of the knee, reproduction of knee alignment and soft tissue stability continues to be a difficult task to achieve. These complex primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) candidates generally require TKA systems incorporating increasing levels of constraint due to the soft-tissue and/or bone deficiencies. In addition, achievement of “normal” gap symmetry through physiologic kinematics is challenging due to the complexity of the overall correction. Advancements in TKA design have not fully addressed the negative consequences of the increased forces between the degree of component constraint, the femoral box, and the tibial post. The purpose of this early feasibility study was to introduce the design characteristics of a primary TKA system that incorporates progressive constraint kinematics using a low profile trapezoidal femoral box, and to assess the short-term clinical and radiographic results of this patient cohort. METHODS. We retrospectively evaluated 22 consecutive, non-selected, complex primary TKA patients with a minimum of 3-years follow-up and varus deformity of > 20 degrees or valgus deformity of >15 degrees. The Progressive Constraint Kinematics® Knee System (PCK, MAXX Orthopedics, Norristown, PA) was used and provides a variable constraint profile, from high constraint in extension to less constraint in flexion through a novel trapezoidal femoral box. We evaluated patient demographics, pre- and post-operative serial radiography, range of motion (ROM), and total Knee Society Score (KSS – total score). General descriptive statistics and paired t-Test to assess the difference between means at p <0.05 level of significance. RESULTS. The average time to most recent follow-up was 40.5 ±3.5 months (range: 36.0 to 44.0 months). The PCK knee system had 100% survival rate at the most recent follow-up, with no reports of adverse events, subsequent corrective surgery, or revision. The average total KSS improved from 72.7 ±3.2 (range: 68 to 81) pre-operatively to 92.3 ±2.1 (range: 88 to 96) post-operatively (p < 0.001). Full post-operative arc of motion was 0 – 130° and there was no radiographic evidence of composite degradation, aseptic loosening or component malalignment. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION. The PCK Knee System utilizes a trapezoidal shaped femoral box, where the narrower end is located anteriorly, allowing a valgus/varus tilt of 1–4 degrees and internal/external rotation of 2–7 degrees during flexion, while maintaining necessary soft-tissue constraint during extension. This variable constraint profile allows for fully tensed collaterals in extension, with a slight reduction in collateral tension through flexion. Furthermore, the combination of the condylar anatomy, trapezoidal femoral box and tibial post allows for adequate clearance through full flexion, while facilitating slightly progressive increases in tilt and rotation, thereby maintaining knee kinematics while dampening forces transmitted through the prosthetic composite. From this feasibility study we report promising short-term clinical and radiographic results in the absence of biomechanical failure in complex primary TKA cases. We recommend continuation of the use and further research of the PCK Knee System for complex primary TKA with the ultimate goal of further determining cost effectiveness and intermediate to long-term clinical relevance

Soft-tissue release plays an integral part in primary total knee arthroplasty by ‘balancing’ the knee. Asian patients often present late and consequently may have large deformities due to significant bone loss and contractures medially, and stretching of the lateral collateral ligament. Extra-articular deformities may aggravate the situation further and make correction of these deformities more arduous. Several techniques have been described for correction of deformity by soft-tissue releases. However, releasing the collateral ligament during TKA has unintended consequences such as the creation of significant mediolateral instability and a flexion gap which exceeds the extension gap; both of these may require a constrained prosthesis to achieve stability. We will show that soft-tissue balance can be achieved even in cases of severe varus deformity without performing a superficial medial collateral ligament release. The steps are: 1. Determining preoperatively whether deformity is predominantly intra-articular or extra-articular; 2. Individualizing the valgus resection angle and bony resection depth; 3. Reduction osteotomy, posteromedial capsule resection, sliding medial condylar osteotomy, extra-articular corrective osteotomy; 4. Compensating for bone loss; 5. Only rarely deploying a more constrained device. Case examples will be presented to illustrate the entire spectrum of varus deformities

Gap planning in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) navigation is critically concerned. Osteophyte is one of the contributing factors for gap balancing in TKA. The osteophyte is normally removed before gap planning step. However, the posterior condylar osteophyte of femur is sometimes removed during the flexion gap preparation or may not be removed at all depends on individual case. This study attempts to investigate on how posterior condylar osteophyte affects on gap balancing and limb alignment during operation. The study was conducted on 35 varus osteoarthritis knees with posterior condylar osteophyte and undergone on TKA navigation. All knees were measured by CT scan for the size of posterior condylar osteophyte according to its width. Extension gap, flexion gap width, and limb alignment were measured by using the tension device with distraction force of 98 N on both medial and lateral sides under computer assisted surgery. The measuring of extension gap, flexion gap width, and limb alignment was undertaken before and after the posterior condylar osteophyte removal. This study reveals that the mean of the size of posterior condylar osteophyte after removal is 8.96 mm. The posterior condylar osteophyte has an effect on the increasing of medial extension gap and lateral extension in average 0.74 ± 0.72 mm. and 0.42 ± 0.67 mm. respectively. It also increases 0.71 ± 1.00 mm. in medial flexion gap and 0.97 ± 1.47 mm. in lateral flexion gap. After the posterior condylar osteophyte removal the mean of varus deformity is decreased 0.90° ± 1.14 ° while the mean of extension angle of sagittal limb alignment is increased 1.61°±1.69°. There is also a significant relationship between the size of posterior condylar osteophyte and the increasing of lateral flexion gap and also with the varus deformity decreasing. If the size of posterior condylar osteophyte is increased 10 mm. the lateral flexion gap will be increased 1.15 mm. and varus deformity will be decreased 0.75 degree

Introduction. Most of the algorithm available today to balance varus knee is based on a surgeon's hands-on experience without full understanding of pathological anatomy of varus knee. The high-resolution MRI allows us to recognize the anatomical details of the posteromedial corner and the changes of the soft tissue associated with the osteoarthritis and varus deformity. We have in this study, reviewed 60 cases of severe varus knee scheduled for TKR and compared it to normal MRI and those MRI were evaluated and read by a musculoskeletal radiologist. We have documented clearly the changes that happens in soft tissue, leading to tight medial compartment. We will also show multiple short intra-operative video confirming that MRI findings. Material & method. We have retrospectively reviewed the MRI on 60 patients with advanced osteoarthritis varus knee. We also reviewed 20 MRI for a normal knee matched for age. We evaluated the posteromedial complex and MCL in sagittal PD-weighted VISTA to check the alignment of the MCL and posteromedial complex and the associate MCL bowing and deformity that could happen in osteoarthritis knee. We have measured the thickness of the posteromedial complex and the posterior medial bowing of the superficial MCL and the involvement of the posterior oblique ligament in those patients. To measure the posterior bowing of the MCL, a line was drawn through the posterior aspect of both menisci and we measured the distance between the posterior edge of MCL to that line in actual image. To measure the thickness of the posteromedial complex, we measured it at two areas in the posterior medial corner posteriorly at the level of the medial meniscus. Measuring the medial bowing of the MCL was done by a line drawn through the medial edge of the femoral condyle and the tibial condyle at the level of the medial meniscus to the inner aspect of the MCL. The normal distance between the posterior aspects of the MCL to the posterior meniscus line was approximately measured 2 cm. in average. Results. We were able to recognize and measure the medial deviation of MCL in all arthritic knees due to the deformity and the effect of the medial margin osteophyte and medial extrusion of the meniscus. Thickening of posteromedial complex was recognized in the majority of the cases with prominent thickening seen in 50/60 knees with average thickness measuring approximately 1.2 cm due to the synovial thickening, adhesions, granulation tissue, degenerated medial meniscus, and involvement of the posterior oblique ligament and the capsular branch of the semimembranosus tendon, as well as the oblique popliteal ligament. The involvement of posterior oblique ligament were seen in majority of the cases. In 55 cases we have showed a heterogeneous appearance of the ligament and loss of normal signal within the postero medial complex and we have documented that the oblique ligament will cause the posterior bowing of the MCL. The medial bowing of the MCL is also correlated to the severity of the varus deformity with an average distance to the normal medial line of the medial meniscus measuring approximately 1.1 cm. Discussion. Our study shows that the changes affecting the superficial MCL is likely to be secondary to the obvious changes involving the posteromedial complex and to the marginal osteophyte as well as the extrusion of the medial meniscus. Also, we have confirmed that there are deforming structures such as the oblique ligament with adhesion and thickening with all the posterior medial complex. Those changes clearly caused the posterior bowing to the superficial MCL without an actual shortening of the ligament. The scarring tissue in the posteromedial corner and the adhesion is acting as a soft phyte tensioning and deforming the ligament and the posterior capsule. The oblique ligament act as a deforming forces forcing the superficial MCL to bow posteriorly. The lengths of the superficial MCL stayed the same. Conclusion. The conventional wisdom of releasing the distal attachment of the superficial medial MCL to balance knee has to be a challenge based on our MRI finding. Releasing the superficial MCL can sometimes lead to a major instability of the knee requiring a more constrained implant. Our MRI assessment clearly showed that the Superficial MCL is deformed because of posterior bowing and medial bowing and considerable thickening of the posteromedial corner, as well as the accompanying osteophyte. We believe that clearing the superficial MCL and excising those thickened scar tissue in the posterior medial corner will enable us to balance the knee without creating instability Conclusion: The conventional wisdom of releasing the distal attachment of the superficial medial MCL to balance knee has to be a challenge based on our MRI finding. Releasing the superficial MCL can sometimes lead to a major instability of the knee requiring a more constrained implant. Our MRI assessment clearly showed that the Superficial MCL is deformed because of posterior bowing and medial bowing and considerable thickening of the posteromedial corner, as well as the accompanying osteophyte. We believe that clearing the superficial MCL and excising those thickened scar tissue in the posterior medial corner will enable us to balance the knee without creating instability

Introduction:. Varus alignment of the knee is common in patients undergoing unicondylar knee replacement. To measure the geometry and morphology of these knees is to know whether a single unicondylar knee implant design is suitable for all patients, i.e. for patients with varus deformity and those without. The aim of this study was to identify any significant differences between normal and varus knees that may influence unicondylar implant design for the latter group. Methodology:. 56 patients (31 varus, 25 normal) were evaluated through CT imaging. Images were segmented to create 3D models and aligned to a tri-spherical plane (centres of spheres fitted to the femoral head and the medial and lateral flexion facets). 30 key co-ordinates were recorded per specimen to define the important axes, angles and shapes (e.g. spheres to define flexion and extension facet surfaces) that describe the femoral condylar geometry using in-house software. The points were then projected in sagittal, coronal and transverse planes. Standardised distance and angular measurements were then carried out between the points and the differences between the morphology of normal and varus knee summarised. For the varus knee group, trends were investigated that could be related to the magnitude of varus deformity. Results:. Several significant differences between normal and varus knees were found, but most of these were small differences unlikely to be clinically significant or have an influence on implant design. However, two strong trends were observed. Firstly, the version of the femoral neck was significantly less for patients with varus knees (mean difference 9°; p < 0.05). The second trend was a significant difference in the sagittal morphology of the medial condyle. The kink angle, the angle formed by the intersection of the circles fitted to the flexion and extension facet surfaces, and their centres (Figure 1) was either absent or small in normal knees (mean 1°). An absent kink angle occurs when the circle defining the flexion facet surface lies within or makes a tangent to the circle defining the extension facet. However, for varus knees, the mean kink angle was 9°, with positive correlation with the angle of varus deformity (Figure 2). Discussion:. Varus knees have a significantly larger kink angle than normal knees, influencing the relative positions of the flexion and extension facet spheres that define the medial condylar geometry, contributing to the commonly observed ‘flattening’ of the medial condyle in the sagittal plane. Varus knees are also associated with significantly less anteversion of the femoral neck. It has been shown that reduced femoral neck anteversion causes increased loading of the medial condyle [1], and our results support this finding. The data generated in this study will feed further biomechanical testing to investigate the influence of kink angle and femoral neck version on the kinematics and load distribution in the varus knee

Excessive under correction of varus deformity may lead to early failure and overcorrection may cause progressive degeneration of the lateral compartment following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, what influences the postoperative limb alignment in UKA is still not clear. This study aimed to evaluate postoperative limb alignment in minimally-invasive Oxford medial UKAs and the influence of factors such as preoperative limb alignment, insert thickness, age, BMI, gender and surgeon's experience on postoperative limb alignment. Clinical and radiographic data of 122 consecutive minimally-invasive Oxford phase 3 medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) performed in 109 patients by a single surgeon was analysed. Ninety-four limbs had a preoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle between 170°-180° and 28 limbs (23%) had a preoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle <170°. The mean preoperative HKA angle of 172.6±3.1° changed to 177.1±2.8° postoperatively. For a surgical goal of achieving 3° varus limb alignment (HKA angle=177°) postoperatively, 25% of limbs had an HKA angle >3° of 177° and 11% of limbs were left overcorrected (>180°). Preoperative HKA angle had a strong correlation (r=0.53) with postoperative HKA angle whereas insert thickness, age, BMI, gender and surgeon's experience had no influence on the postoperative limb alignment. Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 UKA can restore the limb alignment within acceptable limits in majority of cases. Preoperative limb alignment may be the only factor which influences postoperative alignment in minimally-invasive Oxford medial UKAs. Although the degree of correction achieved postoperatively from the preoperative deformity was greater in limbs with more severe preoperative varus deformity, these knees tend to remain in more varus or under corrected postoperatively. Overcorrection was more in knees with lesser preoperative deformity. Hence enough bone may need to be resected from the tibia in knees with lesser preoperative deformity to avoid overcorrection whereas limbs with large preoperative varus deformities may remain under corrected

Introduction. The convincible wisdom is that the release of MCL in severe varus knee should be progressive. This release is usually carried on after resecting the osteophyte and gradually carried on until the MCL is well balanced. However, sometimes, extensive release and releasing the superficial MCL can lead to instability in flexion. On a personal communication with many Asian surgeons they have been doing a careful release of the posteromedial corner in the varus knee and in majority of cases such release is adequate. And even in severe cases of varus knee superficial MCL doesn't need to be released. 20 total knee replacements were performed by the same surgeon using ZimmerPS implant. In the varus deformity ranges from 15–35 degrees. The first bony section was made carefully. All osteophytes were removed and resected. The posterior bone osteophytes were also resected and the intercondylar notches were made along with the posterior release. After doing the bony cut in 18 of those cases the medial compartment was still tight and both flexion and extension. A careful release was carried in the postal medial corner-First using an osteotome around the posteromedial corner to release the soft tissue. After that the thick fibrous tissue that formed like pseudo meniscus was also resected until we were able to reach the posterior capsule. In some cases those scar tissues even extended to the capsule requiring the resecting of the postal medial capsule. We meticulously resected all those scar tissues and in many of those cases were able to visualize the MCL ligament which was well preserved. A tensioning device was used before and after the release. In all of those cases we were able to document an opening ranging from two to seven millimeter after the proper release. In all cases the superficial MCL were still intact and can be operated carefully. Result. This study clearly shows that we did not have to release the superficial MCL and the careful posteromedial release was adequate to obtain a good balance gap immediately and the knee was quite stable. The superficial MCL was maintained and preserved and tensioning device clearly document opening after releasing the postural medial corner. Discussion. In varus knee there is an extensive scar tissue which can sometimes tension the mcl ligament and releasing the deep mcl along with posture medial corner without releasing the superficial will preserve the stability of the knee allowing us to ambulate the patient immediately and preventing instability. Conclusion. Although MCL release has been described in diff ways in multiple literatures, little attention has been paid to the posture medial corner. This paper clearly shows that the complex anatomy of the posture medial corner along with scarring can lead to a tight mcl Releasing such structures would balance MCL&LCL without compromising the superficial MCL which normally lead to obvious flexion instability and a mid-section instability. We strongly recommend surgeon to do the posteromedial release before doing any release to the superficial mcl. Doing so will prevent the incidence of instability after extensive release in varus deformity

Introduction. Well-balanced soft tissue is essential for achieving a good result when performing total knee arthroplasty. The preoperative planning is critical for ensuring a good operation. This study evaluated the preoperative distractive stress radiographs in order to quantify and predict the extent of medial release according to the degree of varus deformity in primary total knee arthroplasty. Methods. We evaluated 120 varus, osteoarthritic knee joints (75 patients). The association of the angle on the distractive stress radiograph with extent of medial release was analyzed. The extent of medial release was classified into the following 4 groups according to the stage: release of the deep medial collateral ligament (group 1), release of the posterior oblique ligament and/or semimembranous tendon (group 2), release of the posterior capsule (group 3) and release of the superficial medial collateral ligament (group 4). Results. Of the 120 cases for which medial release was performed, 30 (25.0%), 41 (34.2%), 20 (16.7%), and 29 (24.2%) cases were in group 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. After medial release, the difference between the medial and lateral gaps in flexion and extension was 0.1 mm (range, 0 to 1 mm) and 0.1 mm (range, 0 to 1 mm), respectively. The difference between the flexion and extension gaps was 0.6 mm (range, 0 to 1.5 mm). The mean femorotibial angle on the preoperative distractive stress radiograph was valgus 2.4° (group 1), valgus 0.8° (group 2), varus 2.1° (group 3) and varus 2.7° (group 4). The extent of medial release increased with increasing degree of varus deformity seen on the preoperative distractive stress radiograph.(Figure 1). Conclusions. The preoperative distractive stress radiograph was useful for predicting the extent of medial release when performing primary total knee arthroplaty. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a common surgical procedure for treatment of patients with varus mal-alignment. The success rate of the procedure is strongly dependent on the quality of the correction. Thus, an accurate pre-planning is essential to ensure that the precise amount of alignment is achieved postoperatively. The purpose of this study was to simulate the HTO in a patient with varus deformity in order to explore the interactions between the wedge angle, the mechanical axis, and the knee joint configuration. A finite element model of the knee joint of a patient with varus deformity was developed. The geometry was obtained using the whole limb CT scans the knee MR images. The bones were assumed as rigid bodies, the articular cartilage and the meniscus as elastic solids, and the ligaments as nonlinear springs. A 600N force was applied at the femoral head in the line of the mechanical axis and the resulting knee configuration was studied. The HTO was simulated assuming insertion of wedges with different angles beneath the tibial plate and applying the resulting alteration of the loading axis to the model. The results indicated that the actual change of the mechanical axes was always smaller than what predicted by a geometric pre-planning approach that does not consider the post-operative change of the knee joint configuration. It was suggested that subject-specific models are needed to simulate the HTO in patients before surgery and determine the appropriate wedge angle that locates the mechanical axis in the middle of the knee

Total knee arthroplasty(TKA) for patients with severe varus deformity has become common operation in Japan because of the rapid aging of the population. Treatment of severe malalignment, instability and bone defects is important. Here we report the clinical results of total knee arthroplasty for 23 knees with severe varus deformity. We defined a severe varus knee femorotibial angle(FTA) as one exceeding 195 degrees. The average observation period was 64 months. Autologous bone graft was performed for 3 knees and augmentation and long tibia stem was used for 3 knees. We used SF-36 for clinical evaluation. Image assessment was based on the standing HKA(Hip-Knee-Ankle)angle, and the Knee Society TKA roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. The mean SF-36 score improved from 47.6 points to 63.7 points after TKA. The standing mean HKA angle was 204°(range 197° to 215°) before surgery and was corrected to 185°(range 176° to 195°). The post-operative standing HKA angle was classified as HKA>184°, 184°>HKA>177°, HKA<176°. A clear zone appeared in zone1 on tibia APX-ray in 4 knees belonging to the HKA>184° group. Our 23 knees achieved good results, and careful postoperative observation is still necessary especially in the vgarus group